• 1
    Gallina A, Chun FK, Suardi N et al. Comparison of stage migration patterns between Europe and the USA: an analysis of 11 350 men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. BJU Int 2008; 101: 15131518
  • 2
    Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 12501261
  • 3
    Epstein JI, Srigley J, Grignon D, Humphrey P, Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma: Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 129: 2430
  • 4
    Fine SW, Amin MB, Berney DM et al. A contemporary update on pathology reporting for prostate cancer: biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 2039
  • 5
    Coughlin G, Dangle PP, Palmer KJ, Samavedi S, Patel VR. Athermal ?early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Robotic Surg 2009; 3: 1317
  • 6
    Orvieto MA, Patel VR. Evolution of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Scand J Surg 2009; 98: 7688
  • 7
    Schatloff O, Chauhan S, Sivaraman A, Kameh D, Palmer KJ, Patel VR. Anatomic grading of nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 796802
  • 8
    Patel VR, Schatloff O, Chauhan S et al. The role of the prostatic vasculature as a landmark for nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 571576
  • 9
    Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982; 128: 492497
  • 10
    Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int 2004; 94: 10711076
  • 11
    Eichelberg C, Erbersdobler A, Michl U et al. Nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 105110
  • 12
    Takenaka A, Murakami G, Matsubara A, Han SH, Fujisawa M. Variation in course of cavernous nerve with special reference to details of topographic relationships near prostatic apex: histologic study using male cadavers. Urology 2005; 65: 136142
  • 13
    Lunacek A, Schwentner C, Fritsch H, Bartsch G, Strasser H. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: ‘curtain dissection’ of the neurovascular bundle. BJU Int 2005; 95: 12261231
  • 14
    Ganzer R, Blana A, Gaumann A et al. Topographical anatomy of periprostatic and capsular nerves: quantification and computerised planimetry. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 353360
  • 15
    Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T et al. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2004; 34: 463468
  • 16
    Lee SB, Hong SK, Choe G, Lee SE. Periprostatic distribution of nerves in specimens from non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2008; 72: 878881
  • 17
    Kaiho Y, Nakagawa H, Saito H et al. Nerves at the ventral prostatic capsule contribute to erectile function: initial electrophysiological assessment in humans. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 148154
  • 18
    Takenaka A, Tewari A, Hara R et al. Pelvic autonomic nerve mapping around the prostate by intraoperative electrical stimulation with simultaneous measurement of intracavernous and intraurethral pressure. J Urol 2007; 177: 225229
  • 19
    Costello AJ, Dowdle BW, Namdarian B, Pedersen J, Murphy DG. Immunohistochemical study of the cavernous nerves in the periprostatic region. BJU Int 2011; 107: 12101215
  • 20
    Ganzer R, Stolzenburg JU, Wieland WF, Bründl J. Anatomic study of periprostatic nerve distribution: immunohistochemical differentiation of parasympathetic and sympathetic nerve fibres. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 11501156
  • 21
    Patel VR, Coelho RF, Chauhan S et al. Continence, potency and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: early trifecta results of a high-volume surgeon. BJU Int 2010; 106: 696702
  • 22
    Clarebrough EE, Challacombe BJ, Briggs C et al. Cadaveric analysis of periprostatic nerve distribution: an anatomical basis for high anterior release during radical prostatectomy? J Urol 2011; 185: 15191525
  • 23
    Sievert KD, Hennenlotter J, Laible IA, Amend B, Nagele U, Stenzl A. The commonly performed nerve sparing total prostatectomy does not acknowledge the actual nerve courses. J Urol 2009; 181: 10761081
  • 24
    Schatloff O, Chauhan S, Kameh D et al. Cavernosal nerve preservation during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is a graded rather than an all-or-none phenomenon: objective demonstration by assessment of residual nerve tissue on surgical specimens. Urology 2012; 79: 596600
  • 25
    Bradford TJ, Weizer AZ, Gilbert SM et al. Is residual neurovascular tissue on prostatectomy specimens associated with surgeon intent at nerve-sparing and postoperative quality of life measures? Urol Oncol 2010; 28: 487491
  • 26
    Levinson AW, Pavlovich CP, Ward NT, Link RE, Mettee LZ, Su LM. Association of surgeon subjective characterization of nerve sparing quality with potency following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2008; 179: 15101514