• 1
    Schulam P. Chapter 9. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction. In Litwin MS , Saigal CS eds, Urologic Diseases in America US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2007: 323332
  • 2
    Symons SJ, Bhirud PS, Jain V, Shetty AS, Desai MR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: our new gold standard. J Endourol 2009; 23: 463467
  • 3
    Braga LHP, Pace K, DeMaria J, Lorenzo AJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate. Eur Urol [Meta-Analysis Review] 2009; 56: 848857
  • 4
    Smaldone MC, Sweeney DD, Ost MC, Docimo SG. Laparoscopy in paediatric urology: present status. BJU Int 2007; 100: 143150
  • 5
    Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG, Peters CA. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol [Comparative Study] 2006; 175: 683687; discussion 687
  • 6
    Mei H, Pu J, Yang C, Zhang H, Zheng L, Tong Q. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't] 2011; 25: 727736
  • 7
    Penn HA, Gatti JM, Hoestje SM, DeMarco RT, Snyder CL, Murphy JP. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: preliminary report of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol [Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial] 2010; 184: 690695
  • 8
    Ravish IR, Nerli RB, Reddy MN, Amarkhed SS. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with open pyeloplasty in children. J Endourol 2007; 21: 897902
  • 9
    Tanaka ST, Grantham JA, Thomas JC, Adams MC, Brock JW 3rd, Pope JC. A comparison of open vs laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty using the pediatric health information system database–do benefits of laparoscopic approach recede at younger ages? J Urol 2008; 180: 14791485
  • 10
    Yee DS, Shanberg AM, Duel BP, Rodriguez E, Eichel L, Rajpoot D. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology 2006; 67: 599602
  • 11
    Casale P. Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population. Curr Urol Rep 2009; 10: 5559
  • 12
    Baldwin DD, Dunbar JA, Wells N, McDougall EM. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2003; 17: 155160
  • 13
    Nelson CP, Park JM, Dunn RL, Wei JT. Contemporary trends in surgical correction of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: data from the nationwide inpatient sample. J Urol 2005; 173: 232236
  • 14
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services OotA, National Health Statistics Group. National Health Care Expenditures Data. 2012
  • 15
    Martin AB, Lassman D, Washington B, Catlin A, Team tNHEA G, Health IUS. Spending remained slow in 2010; health share of gross domestic product was unchanged from 2009. Health Aff 2012; 31: 208219
  • 16
    HCUP Databases. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). June 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • 17
    Friedman B, Jiang HJ, Elixhauser A, Segal A. Hospital inpatient costs for adults with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev 2006; 63: 327346
  • 18
    President EOot, Advisers CoE. Economic Report of the President (2009). U.S. Government Printing Office; 2009
  • 19
    Konety BR, Allareddy V, Herr H. Complications after radical cystectomy: analysis of population-based data. Urology 2006; 68: 5864
  • 20
    Manning WG, Mullahy J. Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? J Health Econ 2001; 20: 461494
  • 21
    Sweeney DD, Ost MC, Schneck FX, Docimo SG. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011; 21: 261265
  • 22
    Penn HA, Gatti JM, Hoestje SM, DeMarco RT, Snyder CL, Murphy JP. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: preliminary report of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 2010; 184: 690695
  • 23
    Freilich DA, Penna FJ, Nelson CP, Retik AB, Nguyen HT. Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey. J Urol [Comparative Study] 2010; 183: 704708
  • 24
    Bonnard A, Fouquet V, Carricaburu E, Aigrain Y, El-Ghoneimi A. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 2005; 173: 17101713
  • 25
    Sukumar S, Sun M, Karakiewicz PI et al. National trends and disparities in the use of minimally invasive adult pyeloplasty. J Urol 2012; 188: 913918
  • 26
    Nguyen HG, Chamie K, Nguyen KG, Durbin-Johnson B, Kurzrock EA. Outcomes after pediatric ureteral reimplantation: a population based analysis. J Urol 2010; 185: 22922297
  • 27
    Robinson BC, Snow BW, Cartwright PC, de Vries CR, Hamilton BD, Anderson JB. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in a pediatric series. J Urol 2003; 169: 638640
  • 28
    Mahomed AA, McLean V. Cost analysis of minimally invasive surgery in a pediatric setting. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007; 17: 375379
  • 29
    Vemulakonda VM, Cowan CA, Lendvay TS, Joyner BD, Grady RW. Surgical management of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a Pediatric Health Information System database study. J Urol 2008; 180 (4 Suppl.): 16891692; discussion 1692