• 1
    Lane BR, Gill IS. 7-year oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2009; 183: 473479
  • 2
    Simmons MN, Chung BI, Gill IS. Perioperative efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 199207
  • 3
    Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 398406
  • 4
    Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 815820
  • 5
    Ficarra V, Benway BM, Bhayani SB et al. Reply from authors re: Ricardo Brandina, Inderbir S. Gill. Robotic partial nephrectomy: new beginnings. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 778779. Eur Urol. Jul: 58:53–6
  • 6
    Haber GP, White WM, Crouzet S et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single-surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients. Urology 2010; 76: 754758
  • 7
    Mullins JK, Feng T, Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Hyams ES, Allaf ME. Comparative analysis of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy techniques in the treatment of localized renal tumors. Urology 2012; 80: 316322
  • 8
    White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R et al. Outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal masses with nephrometry score of >/=7. Urology 2011; 77: 809813
  • 9
    Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Feng T, Yohannan J, Hyams ES, Allaf ME. Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. Urology 2011; 78: 813819
  • 10
    Williams SB, Kacker R, Alemozaffar M, Francisco IS, Mechaber J, Wagner AA. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a single laparoscopic trained surgeon's experience in the development of a robotic partial nephrectomy program. World J Urol 2011; 29: [Epub ahead of print]
  • 11
    Ellison JS, Montgomery JS, Wolf JS Jr, Hafez KS, Miller DC, Weizer AZ. A matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single laparoscopic surgeon versus a multisurgeon robot-assisted cohort for partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2012; 188: 4550
  • 12
    Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, Dunn RL, Wei JT. National utilization trends of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a case of underutilization? Urology 2006; 67: 254259
  • 13
    Ficarra V, Bhayani S, Porter J et al. Predictors of warm ischemia time and perioperative complications in a multicenter, international series of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 395402
  • 14
    Mottrie A, Schatteman P, De Wil P, De Troyer B, Novara G, Ficarra V. Validation of the preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) score in a robot-assisted partial nephrectomy series. World J Urol 2011; 1: [Epub ahead of print]
  • 15
    Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR et al. Comparison of 1800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007; 178: 4146
  • 16
    Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 10231033
  • 17
    Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H, Schroder T. ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 1996; 77: 217222
  • 18
    Sobin LH, Wittekin C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. UICC International Union Against Cancer, 6 edn. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2003: 193195
  • 19
    Kovacs G, Akhtar M, Beckwith BJ et al. The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours. J Pathol 1997; 183: 131133
  • 20
    Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1982; 6: 655663
  • 21
    Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009; 182: 844853
  • 22
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205213
  • 23
    Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol 2003; 170: 6468
  • 24
    Lane BR, Novick AC. Nephron-sparing surgery. BJU Int 2007; 99: 12451250
  • 25
    Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 2009; 182: 866872
  • 26
    Spana G, Haber GP, Dulabon LM et al. Complications after robotic partial nephrectomy at centers of excellence: multi-institutional analysis of 450 cases. J Urol 2011; 186: 417421
  • 27
    Benway BM, Wang AJ, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB. Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 592599
  • 28
    Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Sangalli M, Ficarra V. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 127132
  • 29
    Dulabon LM, Kaouk JH, Haber GP et al. Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 325330
  • 30
    Png KS, Bahler CD, Milgrom DP, Lucas SM, Sundaram C. The role of R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score in the era of robot assisted partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2013; 27: 304308
  • 31
    Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ et al. Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 724730