• 1
    Office of National Statistics. 2012 [cited Accessed October 2012.]; Available from:
  • 2
    Ferlay JSH, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 102010: Available from:
  • 3
    Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 19771984
  • 4
    Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, Basler JW. Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening. JAMA 1993; 270: 948954
  • 5
    Horner MJRL, Krapcho M, Neyman N et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975–2006. Bethesda MD: National Cancer Institute. 2009
  • 6
    Nguyen CT, Kattan MW. Formalized prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer: is it possible? Asian J Androl 2012; 14: 349354
  • 7
    Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd et al. Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 13101319
  • 8
    Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd et al. Prostate cancer screening in the randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: mortality results after 13 years of follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104: 125132
  • 9
    Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ et al. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 981990
  • 10
    Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 17081717
  • 11
    Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 203213
  • 12
    D'Amico AV, Coleman CN. Role of interstitial radiotherapy in the management of clinically organ-confined prostate cancer: the jury is still out. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 304315
  • 13
    Kattan MW. A nomogram for predicting 10-year life expectancy in men with prostate cancer after definitive therapy. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2008; 5: 138139
  • 14
    Chun FK, Steuber T, Erbersdobler A et al. Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 820826
  • 15
    Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M, Brendler CB. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 1994; 271: 368374
  • 16
    Wolters T, Roobol MJ, van Leeuwen PJ et al. A critical analysis of the tumor volume threshold for clinically insignificant prostate cancer using a data set of a randomized screening trial. J Urol 2011; 185: 121125
  • 17
    Lakshmanan V, Yang TH, Reuben RL, Hammer J, Else RW. Assessing the quality of biological tissues using structure-property relationships: macro-scale tests on engineered phantoms. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 133: 166182
  • 18
    Hoyt K, Castaneda B, Zhang M et al. Tissue elasticity properties as biomarkers for prostate cancer. Cancer Biomark 2008; 4: 213225
  • 19
    Phipps S, Yang TH, Habib FK, Reuben RL, McNeill SA. Measurement of the mechanical characteristics of benign prostatic tissue: a novel method for assessing benign prostatic disease. Urology 2005; 65: 10241028
  • 20
    Hien M, Yang TH, Reuben RL, Else RW. Dynamic measurement of intraocular pressure using a mechanical model of the human eye. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 133: 112122
  • 21
    Bigler SA, Deering RE, Brawer MK. Comparison of microscopic vascularity in benign and malignant prostate tissue. Hum Pathol 1993; 24: 220226
  • 22
    Dvorak HF. Tumors: wounds that do not heal. Similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 16501659
  • 23
    Tuxhorn JA, Ayala GE, Rowley DR. Reactive stroma in prostate cancer progression. J Urol 2001; 166: 24722483
  • 24
    Tuxhorn JA, Ayala GE, Smith MJ, Smith VC, Dang TD, Rowley DR. Reactive stroma in human prostate cancer: induction of myofibroblast phenotype and extracellular matrix remodeling. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 29122923
  • 25
    Zhang Y, Nojima S, Nakayama H, Jin Y, Enza H. Characteristics of normal stromal components and their correlation with cancer occurrence in human prostate. Oncol Rep 2003; 10: 207211
  • 26
    Burns-Cox N, Avery NC, Gingell JC, Bailey AJ. Changes in collagen metabolism in prostate cancer: a host response that may alter progression. J Urol 2001; 166: 16981701
  • 27
    Phipps S, Yang TH, Habib FK, Reuben RL, McNeill SA. Measurement of tissue mechanical characteristics to distinguish between benign and malignant prostatic disease. Urology 2005; 66: 447450
  • 28
    Watanabe H, Kato H, Kato T, Morita M, Tanaka M. [Diagnostic application of ultrasonotomography to the prostate]. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 1968; 59: 273279
  • 29
    Dahnert WF, Hamper UM, Eggleston JC, Walsh PC, Sanders RC. Prostatic evaluation by transrectal sonography with histopathologic correlation: the echopenic appearance of early carcinoma. Radiology 1986; 158: 97102
  • 30
    Rifkin MD, Dahnert W, Kurtz AB. State of the art: endorectal sonography of the prostate gland. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154: 691700
  • 31
    Spencer JA, Alexander AA, Gomella L, Matteucci T, Goldberg BB. Clinical and US findings in prostate cancer: patients with normal prostate-specific antigen levels. Radiology 1993; 189: 389393
  • 32
    Trabulsi EJ, Sackett D, Gomella LG, Halpern EJ. Enhanced transrectal ultrasound modalities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urology 2010; 76: 10251033
  • 33
    Brock M, von Bodman C, Palisaar RJ et al. The impact of real-time elastography guiding a systematic prostate biopsy to improve cancer detection rate: a prospective study of 353 patients. J Urol 2012; 187: 20392043
  • 34
    Hamper UM, Trapanotto V, DeJong MR, Sheth S, Caskey CI. Three-dimensional US of the prostate: early experience. Radiology 1999; 212: 719723
  • 35
    Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Pallwein L et al. The value of three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography in staging prostate cancer. BJU Int 2007; 100: 4750
  • 36
    Rifkin MD, Sudakoff GS, Alexander AA. Prostate: techniques, results, and potential applications of color Doppler US scanning. Radiology 1993; 186: 509513
  • 37
    Cornud F, Hamida K, Flam T et al. Endorectal color doppler sonography and endorectal MR imaging features of nonpalpable prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 11611168
  • 38
    Ismail M, Petersen RO, Alexander AA, Newschaffer C, Gomella LG. Color Doppler imaging in predicting the biologic behavior of prostate cancer: correlation with disease-free survival. Urology 1997; 50: 906912
  • 39
    Garra BS. Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 2007; 23: 255268
  • 40
    Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991; 13: 111134
  • 41
    Cochlin DL, Ganatra RH, Griffiths DF. Elastography in the detection of prostatic cancer. Clin Radiol 2002; 57: 10141020
  • 42
    Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 1998; 20: 260274
  • 43
    Teng J, Chen M, Gao Y, Yao Y, Chen L, Xu D. Transrectal sonoelastography in the detection of prostate cancers: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 2012; E614620
  • 44
    Aboumarzouk OM, Ogston S, Huang Z et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transrectal elastosonography (TRES) imaging for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 2012; 110: 14141423; discussion 23
  • 45
    Tsutsumi M, Miyagawa T, Matsumura T et al. Real-time balloon inflation elastography for prostate cancer detection and initial evaluation of clinicopathologic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: W471476
  • 46
    Sumura MY, Naoko A, Takeo H, Koji W, Satoshi H. Real-time balloon inflation elastography of prostate might surpass MRI for detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 2010; 183: e780
  • 47
    Zhang M, Nigwekar P, Castaneda B et al. Quantitative characterization of viscoelastic properties of human prostate correlated with histology. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34: 10331042
  • 48
    Brock M, von Bodman C, Sommerer F et al. Comparison of real-time elastography with grey-scale ultrasonography for detection of organ-confined prostate cancer and extra capsular extension: a prospective analysis using whole mount sections after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2011; 108 (8 Pt 2): E217222
  • 49
    Pelzer AE, Heinzelbecker J, Weiss C et al. Real-time sonoelastography compared to magnetic resonance imaging using four different modalities at 3.0T in the detection of prostate cancer: Strength and weaknesses. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 814821
  • 50
    Junker D, Schafer G, Aigner F et al. Potentials and limitations of real-time elastography for prostate cancer detection: a whole-mount step section analysis. Scientific World Journal 2012; 193213
  • 51
    Wu Z, Taylor LS, Rubens DJ, Parker KJ. Sonoelastographic imaging of interference patterns for estimation of the shear velocity of homogeneous biomaterials. Phys Med Biol 2004; 49: 911922
  • 52
    Wu Z, Hoyt K, Rubens DJ, Parker KJ. Sonoelastographic imaging of interference patterns for estimation of shear velocity distribution in biomaterials. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 120: 535545
  • 53
    Hoyt K, Parker KJ, Rubens DJ. Real-time shear velocity imaging using sonoelastographic techniques. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007; 33: 10861097
  • 54
    Hoyt K, Castaneda B, Parker KJ. Two-dimensional sonoelastographic shear velocity imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34: 276288
  • 55
    Parker KJ, Fu D, Graceswki SM, Yeung F, Levinson SF. Vibration sonoelastography and the detectability of lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24: 14371447
  • 56
    Jalkanen V, Andersson BM, Bergh A, Ljungberg B, Lindahl OA. Resonance sensor measurements of stiffness variations in prostate tissue in vitro – a weighted tissue proportion model. Physiol Meas 2006; 27: 13731386
  • 57
    Barr RG, Memo R, Schaub CR. Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results. Ultrasound Q 2012; 28: 1320
  • 58
    Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, Greenleaf JF, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science 1995; 269: 18541857
  • 59
    Sahebjavaher RS, Baghani A, Honarvar M, Sinkus R, Salcudean SE. Transperineal prostate MR elastography: Initial in vivo results. Magn Reson Med 2013; 69: 411420
  • 60
    Dresner MA, Rossman PJ, Kruse SA, Ehman RL. MR elastography of the prostate. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2002; 526
  • 61
    Dresner MA, Cheville JC, Myers RP, Ehman RL. MR elastography of prostate cancer. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2003; 578
  • 62
    Kemper J, Sinkus R, Lorenzen J, Nolte-Ernsting C, Stork A, Adam G. MR elastography of the prostate: initial in-vivo application. Rofo 2004; 176: 10941099
  • 63
    Li S, Chen M, Wang W et al. A feasibility study of MR elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer at 3.0T. Acta Radiol 2011; 52: 354358
  • 64
    Ehman EC, Rossman PJ, Kruse SA, Sahakian AV, Glaser KJ. Vibration safety limits for magnetic resonance elastography. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53: 925935
  • 65
    Chopra R, Arani A, Huang Y et al. In vivo MR elastography of the prostate gland using a transurethral actuator. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 665671
  • 66
    Hien M, Yang TH, Leung SK et al. Micro-engineered remote palpation device for assessing tissue compliance. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 133: 123131
  • 67
    Yang TH, Leung SK, Phipps S et al. In-vitro dynamic micro-probing and the mechanical properties of human prostate tissues. Technol Health Care 2006; 14: 281296
  • 68
    Ahn BM, Kim J, Ian L, Rha KH, Kim HJ. Mechanical property characterization of prostate cancer using a minimally motorized indenter in an ex vivo indentation experiment. Urology 2010; 76: 10071011
  • 69
    Carson WC, Gerling GJ, Krupski TL, Kowalik CG, Harper JC, Moskaluk CA. Material characterization of ex vivo prostate tissue via spherical indentation in the clinic. Med Eng Phys 2011; 33: 302309
  • 70
    Paul A, Ploussard G, Nicolaiew N et al. Oncologic outcome after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: midterm follow-up of 1115 procedures. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 267272
  • 71
    Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Interexaminer variability of digital rectal examination in detecting prostate cancer. Urology 1995; 45: 7074
  • 72
    Whelan P. Multidisciplinary symposium: prostate cancer – planning primary therapy. Cancer Imaging 2000; 1: 4451
  • 73
    Baumgart LA, Gerling GJ, Bass EJ. Characterizing the range of simulated prostate abnormalities palpable by digital rectal examination. Cancer Epidemiol 2010; 34: 7984
  • 74
    Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 13201328
  • 75
    Okotie OT, Roehl KA, Han M, Loeb S, Gashti SN, Catalona WJ. Characteristics of prostate cancer detected by digital rectal examination only. Urology 2007; 70: 11171120
  • 76
    Vis AN, Hoedemaeker RF, Roobol M, van der Kwast TH, Schroder FH. Tumor characteristics in screening for prostate cancer with and without rectal examination as an initial screening test at low PSA (0.0–3.9 ng/ml). Prostate 2001; 47: 252261
  • 77
    Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C et al. Operating characteristics of prostate-specific antigen in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/ml or lower. JAMA 2005; 294: 6670
  • 78
    May F, Treumann T, Dettmar P, Hartung R, Breul J. Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 2001; 87: 6669
  • 79
    Kvale R, Moller B, Wahlqvist R et al. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study. BJU Int 2009; 103: 16471654
  • 80
    Turkbey B, Mani H, Aras O et al. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging tumor volume with histopathology. J Urol 2012; 188: 11571163
  • 81
    Kasivisvanathan V, Dufour R, Moore CM et al. Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. J Urol 2013; 189: 860866
  • 82
    Isebaert S, Van den Bergh L, Haustermans K et al. Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer localization in correlation to whole-mount histopathology. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37: 13921401
  • 83
    Aigner F, Pallwein L, Schocke M et al. Comparison of real-time sonoelastography with T2-weighted endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 643649
  • 84
    Peng Q, Omata S, Peehl DM, Constantinou CE. Stiffness mapping prostate biopsy samples using a tactile sensor. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011; 2011: 85158518
  • 85
    Rennie D. Improving reports of studies of diagnostic tests: the STARD initiative. JAMA 2003; 289: 8990
  • 86
    Al-Ahmadie HA, Tickoo SK, Olgac S et al. Anterior-predominant prostatic tumors: zone of origin and pathologic outcomes at radical prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32: 229235
  • 87
    Mabjeesh NJ, Lidawi G, Chen J, German L, Matzkin H. High detection rate of significant prostate tumours in anterior zones using transperineal ultrasound-guided template saturation biopsy. BJU Int 2012; 110: 993997
  • 88
    Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Pinggera G et al. Sonoelastography of the prostate: comparison with systematic biopsy findings in 492 patients. Eur J Radiol 2008; 65: 304310
  • 89
    Nelson ED, Slotoroff CB, Gomella LG, Halpern EJ. Targeted biopsy of the prostate: the impact of color Doppler imaging and elastography on prostate cancer detection and Gleason score. Urology 2007; 70: 11361140
  • 90
    Kamoi K, Okihara K, Ochiai A et al. The utility of transrectal real-time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34: 10251032
  • 91
    Ferrari FS, Megliola A, Drudi FM, Trovarelli S, Ponchietti R. Real-time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate tumor. Journal of Ultrasound 2009; 12: 2231
  • 92
    Romagnoli A, Autieri G, Centrella D et al. Real-time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: personal experience. Urologia 2010; 77: 248253
  • 93
    Giurgiu CR, Manea C, Crisan N, Bungardean C, Coman I, Dudea SM. Real-time sonoelastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Med Ultrason 2011; 13: 59
  • 94
    Zhang Y, Tang J, Li YM et al. Differentiation of prostate cancer from benign lesions using strain index of transrectal real-time tissue elastography. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 857862
  • 95
    Miyagawa T, Tsutsumi M, Matsumura T et al. Real-time elastography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: evaluation of elastographic moving images. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2009; 39: 394398
  • 96
    Correas JMKA, Tissier AM, Vassiliu V, Eiss D, Hélénon O. Trans-rectal quantitative Shear Wave Elastrography: application to prostate cancer – A feasibility study. ECR 2011
  • 97
    Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Struve P et al. Real-time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience. BJU Int 2007; 100: 4246
  • 98
    Sumura M, Shigeno K, Hyuga T, Yoneda T, Shiina H, Igawa M. Initial evaluation of prostate cancer with real-time elastography based on step-section pathologic analysis after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study. Int J Urol 2007; 14: 811816
  • 99
    Salomon G, Kollerman J, Thederan I et al. Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 13541362
  • 100
    Walz J, Marcy M, Maubon T et al. Real time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of preoperative imaging and histology after radical prostatectomy. Prog Urol 2011; 21: 925931
  • 101
    Sinkus R, Nisius T, Lorenzen J, Kemper J, Dargatz M. In-vivo prostate MR-elastography. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2003; 586
  • 102
    McGrath DMFW, Samavati N, Lee J et al. Biomechanical Property Quantification of Prostate Cancer by Quasi-static MR Elastography at 7 Telsa of Radical Prostatectomy, and Correlation with Whole Mount Histology. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2011; 19: 1483
  • 103
    Panteliou SD, Tzortzis V, Anagnostopoulos GT et al. Development of a new optical device and its feasibility in prostate cancer detection. Urol Int 2012; 89: 290295