• 1
    Barwari K, Kummerlin IP, Ten Kate FJ et al. What is the added value of combined core biopsy and fine needle aspiration in the diagnostic process of renal tumours? World J Urol 2011; 31: 823827
  • 2
    Schieven LW, Smedts F, Hopman AH, van der Wijk J, Nijman RJ, de Jong IJ. Fine needle aspiration using improved agar microbiopsy is highly concordant with renal mass final diagnosis and subclassification. J Urol 2009; 182: 25902593
  • 3
    Breda A, Treat EG, Haft-Candell L et al. Comparison of accuracy of 14-, 18- and 20-G needles in ex-vivo renal mass biopsy: a prospective, blinded study. BJU Int 2010; 105: 940945
  • 4
    Hruby GW, Lehman D, Mitchell R et al. Optimizing renal cortical neoplasm tissue sampling through a modified biopsy technique: laboratory experience and initial clinical experience. Urology 2007; 70: 431434
  • 5
    Rybicki FJ, Shu KM, Cibas ES, Fielding JR, vanSonnenberg E, Silverman SG. Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 12811287
  • 6
    Barwari K, Beemster PW, Hew MN, Wijkstra H, de la Rosette J, Laguna MP. Are there parameters that predict a nondiagnostic biopsy outcome taken during laparoscopic-assisted cryoablation of small renal tumors? J Endourol 2011; 25: 14631468
  • 7
    Rapp DE, Orvieto M, Sokoloff MH, Shalhav AL. Use of biopsy sheath to improve standardization of renal mass biopsy in tissue-ablative procedures. J Endourol 2004; 18: 453454
  • 8
    Hobbs DJ, Zhou M, Campbell SC, Aydin H, Weight CJ, Lane BR. The impact of location and number of cores on the diagnostic accuracy of renal mass biopsy: an ex vivo study. World J Urol 2013; 31: 11591164
  • 9
    Neuzillet Y, Lechevallier E, Andre M, Daniel L, Coulange C. Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses. J Urol 2004; 171: 18021805
  • 10
    Wang R, Wolf JS Jr, Wood DP Jr, Higgins EJ, Hafez KS. Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in management of small renal masses. Urology 2009; 73: 586591
  • 11
    Menogue SR, O'Brien BA, Brown AL, Cohen RJ. Percutaneous core biopsy of small renal mass lesions: a diagnostic tool to better stratify patients for surgical intervention. BJU Int 2013; 111: E146151
  • 12
    Wunderlich H, Hindermann W, Al Mustafa AM, Reichelt O, Junker K, Schubert J. The accuracy of 250 fine needle biopsies of renal tumors. J Urol 2005; 174: 4446
  • 13
    Harisinghani MG, Maher MM, Gervais DA et al. Incidence of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses (Bosniak category III): should imaging-guided biopsy precede surgery? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 755758
  • 14
    Lang EK, Macchia RJ, Gayle B et al. CT-guided biopsy of indeterminate renal cystic masses (Bosniak 3 and 2F): accuracy and impact on clinical management. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 25182524
  • 15
    Leveridge MJ, Finelli A, Kachura JR et al. Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 578584
  • 16
    Lechevallier E, Andre M, Barriol D et al. Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance. Radiology 2000; 216: 506510
  • 17
    Volpe A, Finelli A, Gill IS et al. Rationale for percutaneous biopsy and histologic characterisation of renal tumours. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 491504
  • 18
    Denton KJ, Cotton DW, Nakielny RA, Goepel JR. Secondary tumour deposits in needle biopsy tracks: an underestimated risk? J Clin Pathol 1990; 43: 83
  • 19
    Zangos S, Eichler K, Wetter A et al. MR-guided biopsies of lesions in the retroperitoneal space: technique and results. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 307312
  • 20
    Uppot RN, Harisinghani MG, Gervais DA. Imaging-guided percutaneous renal biopsy: rationale and approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 14431449
  • 21
    McGahan JP, Loh S, Fitzgerald E et al. Pretreatment imaging can be used to select imaging guidance, ultrasound alone versus CT plus ultrasound, for percutaneous renal radiofrequency ablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 12441250
  • 22
    Crispen PL, Viterbo R, Fox EB, Greenberg RE, Chen DY, Uzzo RG. Delayed intervention of sporadic renal masses undergoing active surveillance. Cancer 2008; 112: 10511057
  • 23
    Kummerlin I, ten Kate F, Smedts F et al. Core biopsies of renal tumors: a study on diagnostic accuracy, interobserver, and intraobserver variability. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 12191225
  • 24
    Novara G, Martignoni G, Artibani W, Ficarra V. Grading systems in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2007; 177: 430436
  • 25
    Delahunt B, Sika-Paotonu D, Bethwaite PB et al. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence. Am J Surg Pathol 2011; 35: 11341139
  • 26
    Hong SK, Jeong CW, Park JH et al. Application of simplified Fuhrman grading system in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2011; 107: 409415
  • 27
    Delahunt B. Advances and controversies in grading and staging of renal cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2009; 22 (Suppl. 2): S2436
  • 28
    Harris CR, Whitson JM, Meng MV. Under-grading of <4 cm renal masses on renal biopsy. BJU Int 2012; 110: 794797
  • 29
    Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Sukov WR, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: the impact of tumor grade on outcome. Am J Surg Pathol 2012; 36: 851856
  • 30
    Finley DS, Shuch B, Said JW et al. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2011; 186: 21682174
  • 31
    Klatte T, Anterasian C, Said JW et al. Fuhrman grade provides higher prognostic accuracy than nucleolar grade for papillary renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2010; 183: 21432147
  • 32
    Waldert M, Klatte T, Haitel A et al. Hybrid renal cell carcinomas containing histopathologic features of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and oncocytomas have excellent oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 661665
  • 33
    Margulis V, Matsumoto ED, Lindberg G et al. Acute histologic effects of temperature-based radiofrequency ablation on renal tumor pathologic interpretation. Urology 2004; 64: 660663
  • 34
    Truesdale MD, Mues AC, Sartori S et al. Comparison of two core biopsy techniques before and after laparoscopic cryoablation of small renal cortical neoplasms. JSLS 2011; 15: 509516
  • 35
    Chen VH, Mayes JM, Madden JF, Stein AJ, Mouraviev V, Polascik TJ. The effect of cryoablation on the histologic interpretation of intraoperative biopsy of small clear cell renal carcinoma and renal oncocytoma. J Endourol 2008; 22: 16171621
  • 36
    Lambert EH, Hruby GW, Abundez JO et al. Comparison of the histologic accuracy of needle biopsy before and after renal cryoablation: laboratory and initial clinical experience. Urology 2007; 70: 10241027
  • 37
    American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2012. Available at: Accessed September 2013
  • 38
    Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 605613
  • 39
    Tsivian M, Mouraviev V, Albala DM et al. Clinical predictors of renal mass pathological features. BJU Int 2011; 107: 735740
  • 40
    Kutikov A, Egleston BL, Canter D, Smaldone MC, Wong YN, Uzzo RG. Competing risks of death in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: a comorbidity based model. J Urol 2012; 188: 20772083
  • 41
    Barwari K, de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP. The penetration of renal mass biopsy in daily practice: a survey among urologists. J Endourol 2012; 26: 737747
  • 42
    Pandharipande PV, Gervais DA, Hartman RI et al. Renal mass biopsy to guide treatment decisions for small incidental renal tumors: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 2010; 256: 836846
  • 43
    Heilbrun ME, Yu J, Smith KJ, Dechet CB, Zagoria RJ, Roberts MS. The cost-effectiveness of immediate treatment, percutaneous biopsy and active surveillance for the diagnosis of the small solid renal mass: evidence from a Markov model. J Urol 2012; 187: 3943
  • 44
    Patel U, Ramachandran N, Halls J, Parthipun A, Slide C. Synchronous renal masses in patients with a nonrenal malignancy: incidence of metastasis to the kidney versus primary renal neoplasia and differentiating features on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: W680686
  • 45
    Sanchez-Ortiz RF, Madsen LT, Bermejo CE et al. A renal mass in the setting of a nonrenal malignancy: when is a renal tumor biopsy appropriate? Cancer 2004; 101: 21952201
  • 46
    Capaccio E, Varca V, Simonato A, Toncini C, Carmignani G, Derchi LE. Synchronous parenchymal renal tumors of different histology in the same kidney. Acta Radiol 2009; 50: 11871192
  • 47
    Patel AR, Lee BH, Campbell SC, Zhou M, Fergany AF. Bilateral synchronous sporadic renal tumors: pathologic concordance and clinical implications. Urology 2011; 78: 10951099
  • 48
    Childs MA, Breau RH, Umbreit EC et al. Metachronous renal tumours after surgical management of oncocytoma. BJU Int 2011; 108: 816819
  • 49
    Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG. Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma-a meta-analysis and review. J Urol 2008; 179: 12271234