SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer Incidence Projections: Australia 2011 to 2020. Canberra: AIHW, 2012
  • 2
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia: An Overview 2010. Cancer series number 60. Canberra: AIHW, 2010
  • 3
    Evans S, Millar J, Davis I et al. Patterns of care for men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Victoria from 2008 to 2011. Med J Aust 2013; 198: 540545
  • 4
    Eggener SE, Scardino PT, Walsh PC et al. Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2011; 185: 869875
  • 5
    Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 115
  • 6
    Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Crispen PL et al. The impact of positive surgical margins on mortality following radical prostatectomy during the prostate specific antigen era. J Urol 2010; 183: 10031009
  • 7
    Ekici S, Ayhan A, Erkan I, Bakkaloğlu M, Özen H. The role of the pathologist in the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2003; 37: 387391
  • 8
    Evans AJ, Henry PC, Van der Kwast TH et al. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32: 15031512
  • 9
    Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178: 23852389; discussion 2389–90
  • 10
    Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Riedel E et al. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 2003; 170: 22922295
  • 11
    Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M et al. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [Reprint in J Urol]. 2008 May; 179 (5 Suppl): S47–51; PMID: 18405751]. J Urol 2005; 174: 903907
  • 12
    Alkhateeb S, Alibhai S, Fleshner N et al. Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy differs by disease risk group. J Urol 2010; 183: 145150
  • 13
    Daly T, Hickey BE, Lehman M, Francis DP, See AM. Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (12): CD007234
  • 14
    Cancer Care Ontario. Prostate Cancer Treatment Pathway. Ontario, Canada; November 2012
  • 15
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Prostate Cancer; 2013. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf. Accessed 26 November 2013
  • 16
    Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 6171
  • 17
    National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and Australian Cancer Network. Australian Cancer Network Management of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Working Party. Sydney: Cancer Council Australia and Australian Cancer Network, 2009
  • 18
    Van der Kwast TH, Bolla M, Van Poppel H et al. Identification of patients with prostate cancer who benefit from immediate postoperative radiotherapy: EORTC 22911. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 41784186
  • 19
    Williams SB, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, Nguyen PL, Choueiri TK, Hu JC. Utilization and expense of adjuvant cancer therapies following radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2011; 117: 48464854
  • 20
    Evans S, Millar J, Wood J et al. The Prostate Cancer Registry: monitoring patterns and quality of care for men diagnosed with prostate cancer. BJU Int 2013; 111: E158166
  • 21
    Giles G, Thursfield V. Prostate Cancer Melbourne: Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria 2000. March 2000. Report No.: 30
  • 22
    Hoffman KE, Nguyen PL, Chen M-H et al. Recommendations for post-prostatectomy radiation therapy in the United States before and after the presentation of randomized trials. J Urol 2011; 185: 116120
  • 23
    Bolton D, Severi G, Millar JL et al. A whole of population-based series of radical prostatectomy in victoria, 1995 to 2000. Aust NZ J Public Health 2009; 33: 527533
  • 24
    Grossfeld GD, Chang JJ, Broering JM et al. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database. J Urol 2000; 163: 11711177; quiz 1295
  • 25
    Kasraeian A, Barret E, Chan J et al. Comparison of the rate, location and size of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2011; 108: 11741178
  • 26
    Magheli A, Gonzalgo ML, Su L-M et al. Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching. BJU Int 2011; 107: 19561962
  • 27
    Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M et al. The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 475480
  • 28
    Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99: 11711177
  • 29
    Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK, Burgess SV, Thomas R, Davis R. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 866871; discussion 871–2
  • 30
    Lawrentschuk N, Evans A, Srigley J et al. Surgical margin status among men with organ-confined (pT2) prostate cancer: a population-based study. Can Urol Assoc J 2011; 5: 161166
  • 31
    Chun FKH, Briganti A, Antebi E et al. Surgical volume is related to the rate of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in European patients. BJU Int 2006; 98: 12041209
  • 32
    Sammon JD, Karakiewicz PI, Sun M et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: the differential effect of regionalization, procedure volume and operative approach. J Urol 2013; 189: 12891294
  • 33
    van der Kwast TH, Collette L, Van Poppel H et al. Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimens (EORTC trial 22911). Virchows Arch 2006; 449: 428434
  • 34
    Fleshner NE, Evans A, Chadwick K, Lawrentschuk N, Zlotta A. Clinical significance of the positive surgical margin based upon location, grade, and stage. Urol Oncol 2010; 28: 197204
  • 35
    Stephenson AJ, Wood DP, Kattan MW et al. Location, extent and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2009; 182: 13571363