We gratefully acknowledge helpful comments from Henry Y. Wan, Jr at the Asia-Pacific Economic Association Third Annual Conference (APEA 2007). The authors also thank the participants of seminars at National Sun Yat-Sen University and National Chung Cheng University. We are grateful to the editor and two anonymous referees for useful comments on the earlier version of this paper. Financial support from the National Science Council (Yo-Yi Huang: NSC 95- 2415-H-019-001 andDeng-ShingHuang: NSC 96-2415-H-001-015-MY2) is acknowledged. Any remaining errors are our responsibility.
HOME MARKET EFFECTS IN THE CHAMBERLINIAN–RICARDIAN WORLD
Article first published online: 22 APR 2013
© 2013 The Authors. Bulletin of Economic Research © 2013 Board of Trustees of the Bulletin of Economic Research and John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Bulletin of Economic Research
Volume 66, Issue S1, pages S36–S54, December 2014
How to Cite
Huang, Y.-Y., Lee, C.-T. and Huang, D.-S. (2014), HOME MARKET EFFECTS IN THE CHAMBERLINIAN–RICARDIAN WORLD. Bulletin of Economic Research, 66: S36–S54. doi: 10.1111/boer.12008
- Issue published online: 20 JAN 2015
- Article first published online: 22 APR 2013
- National Science Council. Grant Numbers: NSC 95- 2415-H-019-001, NSC 96-2415-H-001-015-MY2
- country size;
- home market effects;
- technology differential;
According to conventional home market effects, free trade tends to shrink the market share for a smaller economy in differentiated manufacturing goods, and in the extreme, leads to a complete hollowing out of the industry. Departing from the original Helpman–Krugman modelling assumptions behind the home market effects, we introduce a technology advantage in terms of the difference in fixed cost and/or marginal cost between trading partners and prove that home market effects will be offset and even reverse if a small economy has better technology than another country. With a higher elasticity of substitution, the marginal cost advantage becomes more important if it is to dominate the home market effect. We also show that even with an identical country size, the intra-industry trade addressed in the existing literature may not occur; it will occur only if the technology differential lies within a certain range that is positively affected by the level of transport cost.