Midkine (MK) and pleiotrophin (PTN) are two neurotrophic factors that are highly up-regulated in different brain regions after the administration of various drugs of abuse and in degenerative areas of the brain. A deficiency in both MK and PTN has been suggested to be an important genetic factor, which confers vulnerability to the development of the neurodegenerative disorders associated with drugs of abuse in humans. In this review, evidence demonstrating that MK and PTN limit the rewarding effects of drugs of abuse and, potentially, prevent drug relapse is compiled. There is also convincing evidence that MK and PTN have neuroprotective effects against the neurotoxicity and development of neurodegenerative disorders induced by drugs of abuse. Exogenous administration of MK and/or PTN into the CNS by means of non-invasive methods is proposed as a novel therapeutic strategy for addictive and neurodegenerative diseases. Identification of new molecular targets downstream of the MK and PTN signalling pathways or pharmacological modulation of those already known may also provide a more traditional, but probably effective, therapeutic strategy for treating addictive and neurodegenerative disorders.
This article is part of a themed section on Midkine. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2014.171.issue-4
aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1 member A1
anaplastic lymphoma kinase
blood brain barrier
creatine kinase U-type
COP9 signalosome subunit 5
conditioned place preference
nerve growth factor
protein tyrosine kinase
protein tyrosine phosphatase
protein tyrosine phosphatase type Z
The neurotoxic effects of drugs of abuse underlie not only drug-seeking behaviours but also the neurodegeneration processes associated with chronic drug consumption (Herradon et al., 2009). For example, chronic alcohol consumption is associated with an increase in the incidence of a variety of diseases, including CNS degeneration (Collins and Neafsey, 2012). These addictive and neurotoxic effects of psychostimulants and other drugs of abuse have been associated with enhanced damage of dopaminergic neurons in the nigrostriatal pathway (Ferrucci et al., 2008; Valverde and Rodríguez-Árias, 2013). Drugs of abuse promote the intracellular accumulation of dopamine (Kalivas and O'Brien, 2008), which could elicit neuronal death by blocking mitochondrial complex 1, as occurs, for example, with Parkinsonian agents (Fahn and Sulzer, 2004). In addition, cocaine has been shown to cause significant increases in α-synuclein levels in dopaminergic neurons (Mash et al., 2003). Interestingly, α-synuclein is known to be the main component of Lewy bodies in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) (Spillantini et al., 1997). Furthermore, it was recently found that α-synuclein can induce dose-dependent toxic effects and neurodegeneration in dopaminergic neurons and other neuronal populations (Sanchez-Guajardo et al., 2013). Thus, preclinical evidence suggests that PD is one of the possible long-term neurological consequences of abusing psychostimulants. Interestingly, Callaghan et al. (2012) have recently obtained the first epidemiological evidence showing a significant increase in the prevalence of PD among methamphetamine abusers.
There is much preclinical and epidemiological evidence to support the search for common factors with potential roles in the development of neurodegenerative and addictive disorders in an effort to identify new pharmacological targets for the treatment of both types of disorder, but also to elucidate the connection between drug addiction and neurodegeneration processes. In this regard, two neurotrophic factors with important functions in catecholaminergic neurons, midkine (MK) and pleiotrophin (PTN), have been found to be up-regulated in different brain areas after administration of drugs of abuse and in the degenerating substantia nigra in patients with PD (Gramage and Herradon, 2011). PTN is significantly up-regulated in the nucleus accumbens after acute administration of amphetamine (Le Greves, 2005) and in the cingulate cortex, frontoparietal cortex and caudate putamen after injection of the psychoactive component of cannabis, Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Mailleux et al., 1994). MK has been also found to be up-regulated in the hippocampus of morphine-treated rats (Ezquerra et al., 2007) and in the prefrontral cortex of alcoholics and smokers (Flatscher-Bader and Wilce, 2008). More interestingly, PTN has been found to be highly up-regulated in the substantia nigra of patients with PD (Marchionini et al., 2007). L-Dopa, still the drug of choice for treating the motor symptoms of PD, alone or in combination with other drugs has been found to increase the levels of expression of PTN in the striatum (Ferrario et al., 2004). The existing evidence together with the knowledge that PTN and MK are significantly redundant in structure and function (Herradon et al., 2005) and regulate the survival and function of dopaminergic neurons (Jung et al., 2004; Prediger et al., 2011), support the hypothesis that both neurotrophic factors are up-regulated in neurodegenerative and addictive disorders in order to induce trophic or neuroprotective effects on dopaminergic neurons.
The receptor nomenclature conforms to BJP's Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY (Alexander et al., 2013).
MK and PTN: cytokines with important roles in neural repair and differentiation
MK is a heparin-binding growth factor or cytokine that promotes growth, survival, differentiation and migration of different target cells (Kadomatsu et al., 1988). MK has an important role in development and repair of the CNS (Muramatsu, 2011). PTN, initially cited as heparin-binding growth factor-8 (Milner et al., 1989), and heparin-binding growth-associated molecule (Rauvala, 1989) is a secreted, highly conserved cytokine which shares over 50% identity in amino acid sequence with MK, the only other member of the PTN/MK developmentally-regulated gene family (Kadomatsu and Muramatsu, 2004).
The expression of the MK gene is induced by retinoic acid (Matsubara et al., 1994). The PTN gene is induced by PDGF and basic fibroblast growth factor (Li et al., 1992). The PTN and MK genes are widely expressed at different times in different cell types during development (Silos-Santiago et al., 1996; Deuel et al., 2002; Muramatsu, 2011). However, the expression of both PTN and MK genes is constitutive and limited to only a few cell types in adults (Herradon and Ezquerra, 2009; Muramatsu, 2010). Both genes are up-regulated at sites of injury and repair in inflammatory macrophages, microglia, dermal fibroblasts, endothelial cells and other cells (Jin et al., 2009; Martin et al., 2011; Muramatsu, 2011), suggesting PTN and MK signalling may be critical in different steps of differentiation of different cells both in development and in wound repair. Accordingly, PTN and MK have been shown to induce and stimulate neuronal differentiation (Jung et al., 2004; Ishikawa et al., 2009; Luo et al., 2012). In addition, PTN was found to play a significant role in injury-induced and activity-dependent plasticity in the rat hippocampus (Rauvala and Peng, 1997), to be part of the supportive environment for regeneration of axons after injury (Iseki et al., 2002), to be a source of trophic support for neurons in the brain (Dugas et al., 2008) and to exert key trophic effects on donor cells in neural transplantation in vivo and save nigral dopaminergic neurons from degeneration (Hida et al., 2007; Moses et al., 2008). In contrast, MK is involved in the regeneration of injured peripheral nerves (Sakakima et al., 2009) and protects against ischaemia-related brain injury (Ooboshi, 2011).
Mechanism of action of midkine and pleiotrophin
MK and PTN share common receptors such as receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase type Z (PTPRZ; also called RPTPbeta/zeta) (Maeda et al., 1996; 1999; Meng et al., 2000), syndecan-3 (Rauvala et al., 2000) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) (Stoica et al., 2001). PTPRZ, also known as PTPRB and PTPRZ1 (Krueger and Saito, 1992), is a receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase, which is abundantly expressed in the CNS as a chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (Krueger and Saito, 1992).
MK and PTN bind in a similar manner to PTPRZ (Maeda et al., 1996; 1999). Maeda et al. (1999) showed that the MK terminal domain with neurite promoting activity, the C-terminal domain, was sufficient for the binding to PTPRZ. After removal of the chondroitin sulfate chain, the affinity of MK for PTPRZ decreases (Maeda et al., 1999), suggesting that MK is likely to bind mostly to the chondroitin sulfate portion of PTPRZ. Although binding of MK to PTPRZ has been shown to be key for MK-dependent survival of embryonic neurons, the mechanisms triggered by the formation of the complex PTN/PTPRZ are better known. The interaction of PTPRZ with PTN inactivates the intrinsic tyrosine phosphatase activity of PTPRZ; this inactivation of PTPRZ is presumed to result from a PTN-induced conformational change in this receptor that prevents substrates from accessing the active site in the D1 domain of PTPRZ, a mechanism supported by the demonstration that PTN directly impedes the phosphotyrosine phosphatase activity of PTPRZ (Meng et al., 2000). This hypothesis for the mechanism of action of PTN was confirmed by Fukada et al. (2006). They managed to induce the oligomerization of PTPRZ using an artificial dimerizer, polyclonal antibodies against the extracellular region of PTPRZ and PTN. The PTN/PTPRZ signalling pathway (Figure 1) regulates tyrosine phosphorylation of downstream targets including β-catenin (Meng et al., 2000), β-adducin (Pariser et al., 2005a,b), Fyn (Pariser et al., 2005c), GIT1/Cat-1 (Kawachi et al., 2001) and p190 RhoGap (Tamura et al., 2006), which are important players in cell-cell adhesion, cell motility and migration, cell division, and, importantly, for an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (Perez-Pinera et al., 2007). The robust evidence demonstrating the significant structural and functional redundancy between PTN and MK, that has been compiled for the last two decades (Kadomatsu et al., 2013), suggest that binding of MK to PTPRZ could trigger similar mechanisms to those triggered by the PTN/PTPRZ complex (Figure 1).
MK and PTN are also activating ligands for the ALK receptor (Stoica et al., 2001). PTN exerts a higher binding affinity for ALK (KD = 30 pM) than MK (KD ∼100 pM), although both exert physiological roles through ALK (Wellstein, 2012). However, it has been determined that ALK is also a substrate of PTPRZ (Perez-Pinera et al., 2007) suggesting the possibility that MK and PTN could trigger signalling pathways by direct activation of ALK or by regulating ALK phosphorylation levels through their capacity to inhibit the phosphatase activity of PTPRZ (Figure 1). Similarly to MK and PTN, ALK is also highly expressed in the nervous system during development and it has been suggested that there is connection between the PTN/ALK axis and neuronal repair in adult rats (Mi et al., 2007).
MK has been also shown to bind proteoglycans such as syndecans (Nakanishi et al., 1997), glypican-2 (Kurosawa et al., 2001) and versican/PG-M (Zou et al., 2000). Neuroglycan C also serves as an MK receptor for the promotion of neurites in oligodendrocyte precursor-like cells (Ichihara-Tanaka et al., 2006). In addition, low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP), integrin α4β1 and integrin α6β1 were identified as MK-binding proteins in embryonic mouse brain (Muramatsu et al., 2000; 2004). PTPRZ and ALK also form a complex with LRP and the integrins, suggesting the possibility that LRP and integrins may form the core of the receptor complex for MK, and other molecules such as PTPRZ and ALK are recruited to the complex (Figure 1) (Muramatsu, 2011; Kadomatsu et al., 2013).
Roles of MK and PTN in addiction and neurodegeneration
Methamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, amphetamine derivatives that are more neurotoxic than amphetamine, have been shown to cause dopaminergic cell death in the substantia nigra (Ares-Santos et al., 2013). In contrast, amphetamine is widely known to induce striatal denervation without causing any toxic effects on dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (Krasnova et al., 2005). Surprisingly, it was shown that amphetamine causes dopaminergic cell loss in the substantia nigra of PTN knockout (PTN-/-) mice (Gramage et al., 2010a) suggesting PTN is a single genetic factor that critically modulates previously unknown amphetamine neurotoxic effects (Gramage and Herradon, 2011). Several different drugs of abuse, including amphetamine and its derivatives, have been shown to induce neuroinflammation (Coelho-Santos et al., 2012). Sustained neuroinflammation and/or exacerbated neuroinflammatory responses, including astrocytosis and microglia activation, have been linked to neurodegenerative processes (Qin et al., 2007; Sanchez-Guajardo et al., 2013). Interestingly, amphetamine-induced astrocytosis in the nigrostriatal pathway is significantly enhanced in PTN-/- mice (Gramage et al., 2010a; 2010b). However, amphetamine-induced striatal astrocytosis is also enhanced in MK-/- mice, although loss of dopaminergic terminals in the striatum was found to be similar to that observed in wild type (WT+/+) mice (Gramage et al., 2011). These data suggest that both cytokines have neuroprotective roles against drug-induced neurotoxicity and this hypothesis is supported by results from in vitro studies (Gramage et al., 2008; 2010b). These different responses to amphetamine treatment in PTN-/-, MK-/- and WT+/+ mice led us to use these animal models to identify druggable downstream targets in the PTN/MK signalling pathways that could modulate the amphetamine-induced neurotoxic effects (Gramage et al., 2013a). In proteomic studies, we identified 13 differentially expressed phosphoproteins that are judged to be relevant in the neuroprotective roles of PTN and MK against amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity. It is very interesting to note that four of these phosphoproteins, annexin A7 (ANXA7), COP9 signalosome subunit 5 (COPS5), aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1 member A1 (ALDH1A1) and creatine kinase U-type (CKMT1), are known to be involved in PD. This result is significant, as PTN and MK have also been demonstrated to limit the progression of PD (Prediger et al., 2011; Taravini et al., 2011) and have been suggested to be among the important genetic factors that could prevent the development of PD in methamphetamine abusers (Gramage and Herradon, 2011; Callaghan et al., 2012). Studies designed to confirm or to reject each of those four identified phosphoproteins as new pharmacological targets in the treatment or prevention of amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity (and, possibly, PD) are in progress.
Drug-induced addictive effects
MK and PTN also regulate drug-induced addictive behaviours (Gramage and Herradon, 2011) and pharmacological effects (Gramage and Herradon, 2010; Gramage et al., 2012). The rewarding properties of drugs can be tested in animal models by self-administration studies and the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. CPP is a simple non-invasive procedure, which is compatible with the Pavlovian conditioning serving the drug as an unconditioned stimulus that is repeatedly paired with a specific environment that serves as conditioned stimulus. Environmental cues previously associated with reinforcing drugs can play an important role in relapse to drug seeking behaviours in humans (Dackis and O'Brien, 2005). This conditioning in which previously neutral cues acquire secondary reinforcing properties when paired with a primary reinforce can be tested in the CPP paradigm (Tzschentke, 2007), which is traditionally used to identify novel genetic factors possibly underlying the induction and extinction of drug addictive behaviours, particularly in genetically modified mouse models (Tzschentke, 2007). Morphine-induced CPP is enhanced in PTN-/- mice compared to MK-/- and WT+/+ mice (authors’ personal observation). Acquisition of amphetamine-induced CPP was found to be similar in PTN-/-, MK-/- and the control, WT+/+, mice (Gramage et al., 2010b; 2011). However, in those studies it was shown that PTN-/- mice maintain amphetamine-induced CPP 5 days after the last injection of amphetamine whereas WT+/+ and MK-/- mice did not maintain amphetamine-induced CPP (Gramage et al., 2010b; Martín et al., 2013), suggesting a role for endogenous PTN in the loss of amphetamine-induced CPP. In contrast, we recently found that genetic deletion of MK strikingly decreases the capacity of mice to eradicate cocaine-induced CPP (Gramage et al., 2013b). The data support the notion that the absence of endogenous PTN or MK is a risk factor for amphetamine or cocaine relapse, respectively, after drug withdrawal and suggest that mutations on the PTN/MK genes leading to a loss of their functions or low levels of their expression in humans could underlie an individual increased vulnerability to amphetamine and cocaine relapse.
The evidence presented here and summarized in Table 1 suggests that the potentiation of MK and/or PTN signalling pathways could be a novel therapeutic strategy to treat, prevent or limit drug-induced neurotoxic and addictive effects.
|Drug addiction||Neurodegenerative disorders|
|Neurotoxicity||Addictive behaviour||Parkinson's Disease||Alzheimer's Disease|
↓ Amphetamine nigrostriatal toxicity
↓ Cocaine neurotoxicity
↓ Amphetamine relapse
↓ Morphine reward
↓ nigrostriatal degeneration
↑ functional nigrostriatal recovery
|MK||↓ Amphetamine striatal toxicity||↓ Cocaine relapse|| |
↓ neurochemical and behavioural dysfunctions in nigrostriatal pathways
↓ olfactory and cognitive dysfunctions of early stages
↓ amyloid β-peptide plaques cytotoxicity
↓ amyloid β-peptide plaques deposition
MK and PTN, their receptors syndecan-3 and PTPRZ, and associated intracellular signalling molecules, are highly expressed in the striatum during nigrostriatal development (Marchionini et al., 2007), suggesting important roles for these cytokines in dopaminergic systems in normal and pathological states. Accordingly, PTN has been found to increase the levels of expression of TH, the rate-limiting enzyme in the dopamine synthesis in cell cultures (Jung et al., 2004). The dopamine precursor, L-Dopa, used as a drug of choice in PD, up-regulates the expression levels of PTN in the nigrostriatal pathways of Parkinsonian rats (Ferrario et al., 2004). L-Dopa is known to act as an exogenous precursor to increase dopamine synthesis in the remaining dopaminergic neurons of patients with PD, but also to contribute to a trophic environment for dopaminergic terminals in the striatum, which may turn lead to the development of aberrant striatal circuits and the appearance of L-Dopa-induced dyskinesias (Dicaudo et al., 2012). PTN has been identified as a growth factor with significant trophic effects on dopaminergic neurons in vitro (Jung et al., 2004) and as a critical survival factor for the catecholaminergic PC12 cell line (Gramage et al., 2008). Whether or not, L-Dopa's ability to up-regulate PTN levels of expression is involved in the development of L-Dopa-induced dyskinesia remains to be established. Importantly, PTN was shown to exert key trophic effects on donor cells after neural transplantation in vivo and elicit functional recovery of nigrostriatal pathways (Hida et al., 2007; Moses et al., 2008). In addition, striatal PTN overexpression to an extent similar to the level of PTN expression found in the area during development provides functional and morphological neuroprotection against the Parkinsonian insult in rats (Taravini et al., 2011; Gombash et al., 2012).
MK has previously been shown to promote survival of mesencephalic TH-immunoreactive neurons (Kikuchi et al., 1993). It has also been found that activation of MK and PTN signalling is required for the neuritogenic activity of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in dopaminergic neurons (Sotogaku et al., 2007). In addition, MK deficiency has been related to neurochemical and behavioural dysfunctions in the dopaminergic system (Ohgake et al., 2009), confirming the potential importance of this cytokine in the nigrostriatal pathways in physiological and pathological conditions (Marchionini et al., 2007). Furthermore, genetic deletion of MK causes a partial loss of dopaminergic neurons and depletion of dopamine, resulting in olfactory and memory deficits with no major motor impairments (Prediger et al., 2011). Taking into account that impairments in olfactory and cognitive functions are associated with early onset of disruption of dopaminergic neurotransmission in different brain areas, Prediger et al. (2011) suggested that the MK-/- mouse may represent a promising animal model for the study of the early stages of PD and for testing new therapeutic strategies to restore sensorial and cognitive processes in PD.
The evidence compiled in vivo and in vitro, summarized in Table 1, support the possibility of using PTN or MK as new therapeutics for PD.
MK and PTN have been found to be expressed in senile plaques in the brain of patients with Alzheimer's disease (Yasuhara et al., 1993; Wisniewski et al., 1996). Despite the presence of PTN in the cerebral amyloidoses of patients with Alzheimer's disease and other disorders also characterized by deposition of amyloid β, Down's syndrome (Wisniewski et al., 1996), the role of PTN in the neurodegenerative process inherent to Alzheimer's disease has been studied to a lesser extent than that of MK. In contrast, the study demonstrating the expression of MK in nearly all amyloid β-peptide plaques in the cerebral cortex of eight Alzheimer's disease patients, but not in the control tissues (Yasuhara et al., 1993), led to further studies on the role of MK in this neurodegenerative disorder. For example, elevated serum levels of MK were also detected in nearly half of patients with Alzheimer's disease (Salama et al., 2005). More importantly, MK was found to inhibit cytotoxicity (Yu et al., 1998) and polymerization (Monji et al., 2000) of amyloid β-peptide, suggesting that MK by counteracting the deposition of amyloid β-peptide plaques has a neuroprotective role in this disease. Accordingly, the deposition of amyloid β-peptide plaques derived from transgene was more extensive in MK-/- mice than in WT+/+ mice (Muramatsu et al., 2011). This effect was found to be related to the ability of MK to bind amyloid β-peptide, presumably to inhibit its polymerization, because mice lacking endogenous PTN, which binds with much lower affinity to amyloid β-peptide, did not show enhanced deposition of amyloid β-peptide plaques (Muramatsu et al., 2011).
In summary, these data suggest that MK could be a new therapy to prevent and to limit the progression of Alzheimer's disease. However, further studies are needed to clarify the significance of the expression of PTN in senile plaques of patients with Alzheimer's disease before being able to postulate it as a new therapeutic target in Alzheimer's disease.
Activation of MK/PTN signalling pathways: a novel therapeutic strategy to treat addictive and neurodegenerative disorders
The existing evidence here strongly suggests that the potentiation of the MK/PTN signalling cascades could be a new pharmacological treatment to halt the progression of neurodegenerative conditions, to limit or prevent drug-induced neurotoxic effects and neurodegenerative sequelae, to reduce the rewarding effects of drugs of abuse and to prevent drug relapse. In addition to gene and cellular therapies as a long-term strategy, exogenous administration of MK and/or PTN as well as pharmacological modulation of their known signalling effectors deserve consideration for midterm treatments.
Administration of MK and PTN proteins
In addition to the beneficial effects of MK or PTN overexpression, induced by gene-transfer, observed in preclinical models for the treatment and prevention of neural injury and neurodegeneration induced by different causes, including cerebral infarction, Alzheimer's disease and PD (Gramage and Herradon, 2011; Muramatsu, 2011; Taravini et al., 2011; Gombash et al., 2012), the neuroprotective effects of exogenous administration of MK have also been observed in animal models. In order to evaluate in vivo activity of MK in preventing neuronal death, Yoshida and colleagues (2001) administered MK into the brain ventricle immediately before occlusion of the bilateral common carotid artery of Mongolian gerbils. MK administration (0.5–2 μg) was found to ameliorate delayed neuronal death in the hippocampal CA1 region caused by transient ischaemia. In addition, it has been shown that i.c.v. administration of MK (0.4 μg) significantly reduced neuronal loss in the kainic acid (KA)-injected mouse hippocampus and the intensity and duration of KA-induced seizures (Kim et al., 2010).
Although promising, these results were obtained after intracranial administration of MK, a route of administration that should be avoided in humans whenever possible. Exogenous administration of MK has been recently patented for the treatment of various forms of ischaemia, including heart attack (US patent number 8288343). This patent covers the stimulation of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis by MK injection in order to facilitate blood flow, vasodilatation and angiogenesis in the damaged tissue. Whether or not this novel mechanism triggered by MK is also involved in the neuroprotective effects of MK in neurotoxic or neurodegenerative processes remains to be clarified. However, drug delivery to the CNS is highly problematic because the blood–brain barrier (BBB) acts through a variety of mechanisms to prevent the unregulated entry of blood-borne substances into the brain (Pardridge, 2012). There are ongoing clinical trials that involve intracerebral administration of growth factors such as glial-derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor (NGF) to treat Alzheimer's disease and PD (Allen et al., 2013); however, the inherent risks of this route of administration limit its general use in these patient populations.
Many groups are currently working to overcome these limitations using other routes of administration and advanced pharmaceutical technology. For instance, strategic drug delivery to the brain, an approach that considers in depth the relationship among the BBB, the candidate therapeutic, the CNS target and the disease state to be treated, has been successfully applied to deliver a leptin analogue into the CNS (Banks et al., 2011). In addition, the convenient intranasal administration of different growth factors such as NGF and acidic fibroblast growth factor has been successful at inducing neurogenesis and angiogenesis after brain ischaemic stroke (Cheng et al., 2011), attenuating the progression of Alzheimer's disease (Capsoni et al., 2012) and reducing the oedema subsequent to traumatic brain injury (Lv et al., 2013). Thus, intranasal delivery is emerging as a non-invasive option for delivering drugs to the CNS. This method also facilitates the delivery of large and/or charged therapeutics, which fail to effectively cross the BBB (Chapman et al., 2012). In addition, it is very important to note that the existence of the nose-to-cerebral spinal fluid pathway has been verified in humans and, furthermore, there is abundant indirect evidence for the nose-to-brain pathway as determined by the efficacy of intranasally administered neuroproteins, such as insulin, oxytocin, and vasopressin in clinical trials (Zhu et al., 2012). The evidence summarized in this review strongly supports the preclinical evaluation of intranasal administration of MK and/or PTN as a critical preliminary step before testing the clinical application of MK and PTN in treating chronic CNS diseases.
Other emerging techniques, such as non-invasive disruption of the BBB using focused ultrasound, have been successfully employed to systemically administer neurotrophic factors and trigger neuronal downstream signalling effects in a highly localized region in the brain (Baseri et al., 2012). Non-invasive ultrasound delivered to the brain through the intact skull combined with preformed microbubbles, can safely induce transient, localized and reversible disruption of the BBB, allowing therapeutics to be delivered into the CNS; this has recently been demonstrated in rodent models of Alzheimer's disease and humans (O'Reilly and Hynynen, 2012). Protein carriers for brain-targeting delivery of therapeutic proteins are producing promising results as well in animal models (Fu et al., 2013). Nanotechnology has patented new formulations and is evolving as a promising new technique for delivering drugs needed to treat brain diseases, especially those arising from neurodegenerative conditions (Jain et al., 2013). The ideal method for transporting drugs across the BBB should be controllable and should not damage the barrier and amongst the various approaches that are available, nanobiotechnology-based delivery has been judged to be the best (Jain et al., 2013).
All in all, when thinking of exogenous administration of growth factors, potential side effects derived from their carcinogenic properties have to be considered (Muramatsu, 2010). It should be noted that MK and PTN exhibit angiogenic potential, which is important in the tissue remodelling and repair capacity of both cytokines after injury (Weckbach et al., 2012; Fang et al., 2013). In addition, MK/PTN may alter the vascular tone of large vessels, such as aorta, as it may affect the regulation of catecholamine synthesis and the renin-angiotensin II system in this tissue (Herradon et al., 2004; Ezquerra et al., 2005; Hobo et al., 2009), effects which have been associated with the known capacity of MK to induce hypertension (Kadomatsu, 2010). However, the potential peripheral side effects of PTN/MK can be diminished by the choice of method used to administer the substances to the CNS. For instance, with regard to the possible peripheral effects using intranasal administration, experience with NGF has shown that intranasal delivery minimizes the build-up of peripheral NGF, even though residual leakage and absorption of NGF into the blood stream occurs from the nasal compartment (Malerba et al., 2011).
Pharmacological modulation of the MK/PTN/PTPRZ signalling pathway
The cellular phosphatase activity of PTPs is precisely balanced by the kinase activity of other family of enzymes, the protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs). Disruption of this balance underlies different diseases (Hendriks et al., 2008). For this reason, PTPs (including the receptor-like class) are currently being considered as prime targets for drug design (Wong et al., 2013) following the path opened by selective PTK inhibitors that were previously developed and reached clinical use (Ventura and Nebreda, 2006). Pharmaceutical development of therapeutics targeting PTPs has been proposed to treat a wide variety of diseases including diabetes mellitus, neural diseases such as PD and Alzheimer's disease, inflammatory diseases and allergy (Herradon and Ezquerra, 2009; Heneberg, 2009).
In the case of the MK/PTN receptor, PTPRZ, reports of PTPR inhibitors are usually from PTP-1B programme screening panels. For example, PTPRZ is often found in selection panels in PTP inhibitor screens (Hoffman et al., 2004). Following this path, Huang and colleagues (2003) designed a trifluoromethyl sulfone (4-trifluoromethylsulfonylbenzyl 4-trifluoromethylsulfonylphenyl ether) inhibitor of PTPRZ with an IC50 of 3.5 μM that is twofold selective versus PTPRE and ∼10-fold selective versus PTPRD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only PTPRZ inhibitor synthesized with relative selectivity, although we should expect, in the short term, a number of this type of compounds since methods designed to specifically test inhibitors of PTPRZ have been recently patented (i.e. US patent number 20100287626).
Fyn kinase, β-catenin and β-adducin, known substrates of PTPRZ, the levels of phosphorylation of which are regulated by the ability of PTN to inhibit the phosphatase activity of PTPRZ, have been linked to the development and progression of neurodegenerative and addictive disorders (see review by Gramage and Herradon, 2011). Thus, pharmacological modulation of PTN and MK signalling cascades for these indications could be achieved by acting downstream of PTPRZ. Because β-catenin and β-adducin show a wide variety of functions, many of them critical at the cellular level, their pharmacological modulation is anticipated to be problematic. However, different rational drug design programmes targeting Fyn kinase are currently being developed because of the demonstrated implication of this kinase in cancer and brain diseases such as PD and Alzheimer's disease (Schenone et al., 2011). However, a significant obstacle needs to be overcome before modulation of Fyn kinase activity can be used to regulate PTN and MK functions: the specific residues in Fyn that are specifically modulated by PTN/MK need to be identified. PTN has been shown to increase tyrosine phosphorylation of Fyn by inhibiting PTPRZ phosphatase activity (Pariser et al., 2005c), but, to the best of our knowledge, specific residues phosphorylated in Fyn by PTN have not been identified. This is of critical importance because depending on the residue that is phosphorylated the kinase activity of Fyn may be activated or inhibited. For instance, activation of the kinase activity of Fyn by phosphorylation of its residue Y417 leads to the phosphorylation of the NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor which is involved in alcohol dependence (Wang et al., 2007).
The recent application of phosphoproteomic techniques to identify proteins that may be relevant mediators of PTN/MK neuroprotective effects against amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity (Gramage et al., 2013a) has revealed several new compounds: ANXA7, COPS5, ALDH1A1 and CKMT1. Table 2 summarizes the cellular function of these proteins and existing evidence supporting their possible roles in neurodegenerative diseases. Since the phosphorylation pattern of these proteins was found to be differentially regulated by amphetamine treatment and the presence/absence of endogenous MK and PTN (Gramage et al., 2013a), the data not only confirm the connection between the molecular mechanisms of amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity and those involved in neurodegenerative processes but suggest these four proteins could be new pharmacological targets involved in the neuroprotective effects of MK and PTN. Interestingly, some of these proteins, such as ALDH1A1, are already in screening panels for drug discovery. The current development of aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors (Koppaka et al., 2013) provides a rationale for the continued development of ALDH isozyme-selective modulators (including activators) with potential applications in addictive and neurodegenerative disorders.
|Protein (Abbreviation)||Function||Role in neurodegenerative disorders|
|Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1 member A1 (ALDH1A1)||Metabolism of biogenic aldehydes and amines, and its potentially toxic metabolites (Anderson et al., 2011).|| |
|Annexin A7 (ANXA7)||Calcium/phospholipid-binding protein involved in exocytosis (Liemann and Lewit-Bentley, 1995).|| |
|COP9 signalosome subunit 5 (COPS5)||Regulates the cellular ubiquitin/proteasome pathway (Li et al., 2008).|| |
|Creatine kinase U-type (CKMT1)||Reversibly convert creatine into phosphocreatine and shielding effects on the opening of transition permeability pores in the mitochondria, thus affecting necrotic and apoptotic processes (Adhihetty and Beal, 2008).|
There is robust evidence demonstrating that MK and PTN limit the rewarding effects of drugs of abuse and, potentially, prevent drug relapse. There is also convincing evidence that MK and PTN provide neuroprotective effects against the neurotoxicity and development of neurodegenerative disorders induced by drugs of abuse. The next step, achievable in the midterm, is to identify a suitable method for MK and PTN delivery into the CNS by a non-invasive technique. Based on existing evidence with different growth factors, intranasal administration of MK/PTN or nanobiotechnology-based delivery techniques are suggested as prime methods to test MK/PTN delivery to the CNS; i.c.v. administration of MK (or PTN) could serve as a control since it has been successfully used in animal models. Identification of new molecules, downstream of MK/PTN/PTPRZ or pharmacological modulation of those already known provide a more traditional, but probably effective, therapeutic strategy for treating addictive and neurodegenerative disorders.
This work has been supported by grants SAF2007-61528 and SAF2009-08136 from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain to GH.
Conflict of interest
None to declare.