SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abelson, D. 2009. Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.
  • Alford, R. and R. Friedland. 1985. Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Amenta, E., N. Caren, S.J. Olasky and J. Stobaugh. 2009. “All the Movements Fit to Print: Who, What, When, Where, and Why SMO Families Appeared in the New York Times in the Twentieth Century.” American Sociological Review 74:63656.
  • Baber, Z. 2001. “Globalization and Scientific Research: The Emerging Triple Helix of State-Industry-University Relations in Japan and Singapore.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 21(5):401408.
  • Berman, E.P. 2011. Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Binder, A. 2007. “For Love and Money: Organizations’ Creative Responses to Multiple Environmental Logics.” Theory and Society 36:54771.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1990. Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Breiger, R. 2000. “A Tool-Kit for Practice Theory.” Poetics 27:91115.
  • Breiger, R. 2009. “On the Duality of Cases and Variables: Correspondence Analysis (CA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).” Pp. 24359 in The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods, edited by D. Byrne and C. Ragin. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Burt, R. 1980. “Cooptive Corporate Actor Networks: A Reconsideration of Interlocking Directorates Involving American Manufacturing.” Administrative Science Quarterly 25:55758.
  • Carroll, W. 2007. “Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony in a Global Field.” Social Studies in Social Justice 1(1):3666.
  • Carroll, W. and C. Carson. 2003. “The Network of Global Corporations and Elite Policy Groups: A Structure for Transnational Capitalist Class Formation.” Global Networks 3:2957.
  • Cole, S. 1992. Making Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Dahl, R.A. 1974. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Dahl, R.A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale.
  • DiMaggio, P. 1991. “Constructing an Organizational Field as a Professional Project: US Art Museums, 1920–1940.” Pp. 26792 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by P. DiMaggio and W. Powell. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Domhoff, W. 2009. “The Power Elite and Their Challengers.” American Behavioral Scientist 52(7):95573.
  • Domhoff, W. 2010. Who Rules America? Challenges to Corporate and Class Dominance. 6th ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
  • Dye, T. 2001. Top Down Policy Making. New York, NY: Chatham House Publishers.
  • Emerson, R. 1962. “Power-Depedence Relations.” American Sociological Review 27:3141.
  • Evans, J. 2010. “Industry Induces Academic Science to Know Less about More.” American Journal of Sociology 116(2):389452.
  • Evans, R. and T. Kay. 2008. “How Environmentalists ‘Greened’ Trade Policy: Strategic Action and the Architecture of Field Overlap.” American Sociological Review 73(6):97091.
  • Fligstein, N. and D. McAdam. 2012. A Theory of Fields. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Friedland, R. and R. Alford. 1991. “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” Pp. 23263 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by P. DiMaggio and W. Powell. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Fuchs, S. 1992. The Professional Quest for Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Greenacre, M. 2010. Correspondence Analysis in Practice. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Gutstein, D. 2009. Not a Conspiracy Theory: How Business Propaganda Hijacks Democracy. Toronto, ON: Key Porter.
  • Hochschild, J. 2005. “Conducting Intensive Interviews and Elite Interviews.” Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Research. Report prepared for the National Science Foundation.
  • Hunter, F. 1969. Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision Makers. Chapel Hill, NC: UNC Press.
  • Kleinman, D.L. 2003. Impure Cultures: University Biology and the World of Commerce. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Kleinman, D.L. and S. Vallas. 2001. “Science, Capitalism, and the Rise of the ‘Knowledge Worker:’ The Changing Structure of Knowledge Production in the United States.” Theory and Society 30(4):45192.
  • Lamont, M. 2009. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Le Roux, B. and H. Rouanet. 2004. Geometric Data Analysis: From Correspondence Analysis to Structured Dara Analysis. New York, NY Springer.
  • Lukes, S. 2004. Power: A Radical View. 2d ed. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • McGann, J. 2010. “The Global ‘Go-To Think Tanks,’ 2010.” The Think Tank and Civil Society Program, University of Pennsylvania.
  • McQuaig, L. and N. Brooks. 2010. The Trouble with Billionaires. Toronto, ON: Viking Canada.
  • Medvetz, T. 2012. Think Tanks in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Merton, R. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Miles, M. and M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Mills, C.W. 1959. The Power Elite. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Mirowski, P. and R. van Horn. 2005. “The Contract Research Organization and the Commercialization of Scientific Research.” Social Studies of Science 35(4):50348.
  • Mohr, J. 1998. “Measuring Meaning Structures.” Annual Review of Sociology 24:34570.
  • Murray, F. 2010. “The Oncomouse that Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions.” American Journal of Sociology 116(2):34188.
  • Nenadic, O. and M. Greenacre. 2003. “Correspondence Analysis in R, with Two and Three Dimensional Graphics: The ca Package.” Journal of Statistical Software 20:113.
  • O'Neil, K. 2008. “Bringing Art to Market: The Diversity of Pricing Styles in a Local Art Market.” Poetics 36(1):94113.
  • Owen-Smith, J. 2003. “From Separate Systems to a Hybrid Order: Accumulative Advantage across Public and Private Science at Research One Universities.” Research Policy 32(6):10811104.
  • Peschek, J. 1987. Policy-Planning Organizations: Elite Agendas and America's Rightward Turn. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Pfeffer, J. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
  • Polsby, N. 1983. “Tanks, but No Tanks.” Public Opinion 6:1416.
  • Quirke, L. 2013. “Rogue Resistance: Sidestepping Isomorphic Pressures in a Patchy Institutional Field.” Organization Studies 34:167599.
  • Ragin, C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Rao, H., P. Monin and R. Durand. 2003. “Institutional Change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as an Identity Movement in French Gastronomy.” American Journal of Sociology 108(4):795843.
  • Rich, A. 2004. Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rihoux, B. 2006. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods: Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges for Social Science Research.” International Sociology 21:679706.
  • Rihoux, B. and C. Ragin. 2008. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Rossiter, M. 1993. “The Matilda Effect in Science.” Social Studies of Science 34:32541.
  • Scott, R. 1998. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Siler, K. and N. McLaughlin. 2008. “The Canada Research Chairs Program and Social Science Reward Structures.” Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 45(1):93119.
  • Slaughter, S. and L. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
  • Small, M.L. 2009a. “How Many Cases Do I Need? On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-Based Research.” Ethnography 10(1):538.
  • Small, M.L. 2009b. Unanticipated Gains: Origins of Network Inequality in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Smith, J. 1993. The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Spector, M. 1980. “Learning to Study Public Figures.” Pp. 4556 in Fieldwork Experience: Qualitative Approaches to Social Research, edited by W. Shaffir, R. Stebbins and A. Turowetz. New York, NY: St. Martin's.
  • Stone, D. 2000. “Non-Governmental Policy Transfer: The Strategies of Independent Policy Institutes.” Governance 13:4570.
  • Stone, D., and A. Denham, eds. 2004. Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Thiem, A. and A. Dusa. 2013. Qualitative Comparative Analysis with R: A User's Guide. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Thorton, P., W. Ocasio and M. Lounsbry. 2012. The Institutional Logic Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Weaver, K. 1989. “The Changing World of Think Tanks.” PS: Political Science and Politics 22(2):56378.
  • Weinstein, M. 2006. “TAMS Analyzer: Anthropology as Cultural Critique in a Digital Age.” Social Science Computer Review 24:6877.
  • Whitley, R. 1984. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.