SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References

This study examines the possible association between urinary tract infection (UTI) and urinary tract cancer (UTC). Data from the National Health Insurance system of Taiwan were used for the analysis. The UTI cohort included 70 116 patients who were diagnosed and recruited between 1997 and 2010. Each patient was randomly frequency-matched with two people without UTI from the general population based on their age, sex, and month of UTI diagnosis. Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis was used to estimate the effects of UTI on UTC risk until the end of follow-up on December 31, 2010. Patients with UTI had a significantly higher risk of developing UTC than healthy people (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.66; 95% confidence interval, 3.55–6.10). Further analyses indicated that risks are potentially related to the level of the lesion site. This study indicated that patients with UTI had a higher risk of developing UTC.

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common extraintestinal infectious disease entity in women worldwide. Approximately 50% of women have at least one symptomatic UTI during their lifetime, and recurrent episodes are common.[1] Several infections are related to the development of cancer, including human papilloma virus-associated cancer such as head and neck cancers, cervical cancer,[2, 3] hepatitis B and C virus-associated liver cancer,[4, 5] Epstein–Barr virus-related nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoma,[6] and Helicobacter pylori infection-induced gastric cancer.[7]

Chronic inflammation induced by bladder infection could have a role in human bladder cancer development.[8, 9] The relationship between schistosomiasis and bladder cancer has been confirmed.[10] Several case–control studies focused on the connection between UTI and bladder cancer risk and, although most showed that patients with UTI had a higher risk of bladder cancer, results were inconsistent.[11, 12] Compared to bladder cancer, significantly fewer studies have discussed the connection between UTI and renal pelvis/ureter cancer because of its relative rarity. Studies regarding this issue showed either non-significant findings[13] or inconclusive results.[14]

Several mechanisms were proposed for explaining the association between infection and bladder cancer.[11, 12] First, chronic inflammation of the bladder may induce urinary retention and stasis, which can potentially increase exposure and absorption of carcinogens present in the urine.[15] Second, bacterial flora in the urine may contribute to the production of nitrites that are converted to carcinogenic nitrosamines.[16] This study attempts to determine if there is a higher risk of bladder cancer for patients with UTI by examining a Taiwanese cohort. Because of an unusually high incidence of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan,[17]upper urinary tract cancer was of primary interest, but ensuing investigations were extended to cover all urinary tract cancers (UTC) except renal cell carcinoma. The results in this study were generated from a population-based retrospective cohort obtained from the National Health Insurance (NHI) system's database in Taiwan.

Materials and Methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References

Data sources

This longitudinal retrospective cohort study used reimbursement data obtained from the medical claims database of the Taiwanese universal NHI system. The NHI was implemented in 1995, providing health care to approximately 99% of the population (23.74 million people). The NHI system has contracts with 97% of hospitals and clinics in Taiwan.[18] The claims data from the NHI Research Database (NHIRD), which is managed by the National Health Research Institute (NHRI), was used for this study. The NHRI assembled a research dataset containing all reimbursement claims records from 1996 to 2010 for one million randomly selected insured residents. Data from the NHIRD are representative of the entire population because the NHRI reported that no statistically significant differences were found in the distributions of age, sex, or health-care expenditures between the subset of the NHIRD and all enrollees. Personal identification information was encrypted before releasing the research database to protect patient privacy. This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of China Medical University (Taichung, Taiwan) (CMU-REC-101-012).

Study patients

Patients with recently identified UTI (1997–2010) (International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] codes 590, 595) were selected as the study cohort from the database of one million randomly selected insured residents. A non-UTI comparison group was randomly selected from all NHI beneficiaries aged 20 years and older and matched with the UTI group at a 2:1 ratio based on age (every 5-year span), sex, month of UTI diagnosis, and area of residence. The index date was used as the date of UTI diagnosis. The 15th day of the index date month was used for the comparison group. Patients with any cancer (ICD-9-CM codes 140–208) before the index date or aged younger than 20 years were excluded from the study.

Outcome measures

The confirmation of UTC (ICD-9-CM codes 188, 189) events was based on the registry of catastrophic illness, which is a sub-dataset of the NHIRD. Each patient was followed until a diagnosis of UTC was confirmed, until the patient was censored for loss at follow-up, death, withdrawal from the insurance system, or to the end of the follow-up (December 31, 2010). Some of the UTI may be caused by the UTC itself. To consider this possibility, we excluded the UTC cases diagnosed within 1 year after recruitment. Moreover, the baseline comorbidity history of each patient was identified, including diabetes (ICD-9-CM code 250), hypertension (ICD-9-CM codes 401–405), and hyperlipidemia (ICD-9-CM codes 272).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the sas statistical software package for Windows (version 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), and the significance level was set at 0.05. Demographic factors such as age, sex, and comorbidities were compared between the UTI cohort and non-UTI cohort. The differences were tested with the Chi-squared test for categorical variables and Student's t-test for continuous variables. The incidence of UTC was compared between the UTI cohort and the non-UTI cohort stratified by sex, age, and comorbidities. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of UTC in the UTI and non-UTI cohorts. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess the UTC risk associated with demographic factors and comorbidities. We used the Kaplan–Meier method to estimate the failure functions of UTC between the UTI cohort and the non-UTI cohort, and assessed the differences using a log–rank test.

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References

The characteristics of all 209 838 participants from the UTI cohort and the non-UTI comparison cohort are listed in Table 1. Of all study participants, 78.64% were women, and most (61.95%) were aged 50 years and younger. Patients with UTI were more likely to reside in northern areas of Taiwan (41.96%). Patients in the UTI cohort had a higher incidence of diabetes (10.83% vs 6.43%; < 0.0001), hypertension (23.64% vs 17.09%; < 0.0001), and hyperlipidemia (13.36% vs. 8.07%; < 0.0001), compared to the non-UTI comparison cohort.

Table 1. Comparison of demographics and comorbidity between patients with urinary tract infection (UTI) and non-UTI controls
 Urinary tract infectionP-value
No (N = 139 722)Yes (N = 70 116)
n % n %
  1. Chi-square test; †t-test.

Age, year
≤5086 67062.0343 33561.800.39
51–6428 94820.7214 52120.71
>6524 10417.3312 26017.50
Mean (SD)45.8317.1946.3916.92<0.0001
Follow-up years, mean (SD)8.944.019.233.82<0.0001
Sex
Female109 84278.6155 16978.770.72
Male29 88021.3914 94721.23
Area of residence
Northern58 70042.0129 35241.870.88
Medium29 86421.3715 04621.55
Southern39 26128.1019 69828.11
Eastern11 8978.5160208.59
Comorbidity
Diabetes89866.43759410.80<0.0001
Hypertension23 87917.0916 57223.64<0.0001
Hyperlipidemia11 2798.07937013.36<0.0001

Overall, the incidence of UTC was higher in the UTI cohort than in the non-UTI cohort (2.89 vs 0.60 per 10 000 person-years, HR = 4.80, 95% CI = 3.67–6.28). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model revealed that patients with UTI had a 4.66-fold higher risk of developing UTC (adjusted HR = 4.66, 95% CI = 3.55–6.10) after considering age, sex, and comorbidities. Both cohorts showed that men had a higher incidence of UTC than women (1.31 vs 0.43 per 10 000 person-years, and 8.25 vs 1.62 per 10 000 person-years for non-UTI and UTI cohorts, respectively), and had a higher HR than women (6.30 with 95% CI = 4.24–9.37 vs HR = 3.78 with 95% CI = 2.62–5.45). The adjusted HR was significantly higher in men than in women (2.78, 95% CI = 2.17–3.56) (Table 2). The HR was highest in patients aged 65 years and more (HR = 5.63, 95% CI = 3.83–8.27). Thus, the adjusted HR was 11.8 (95% CI = 7.81–17.8) for elderly patients, compared to patients ≤50 years of age. Compared to patients living in northern areas, the patients lived in western, southern, and eastern areas had higher risks of developing UTC.

Table 2. Incidence and adjusted hazard ratio of urinary tract cancer stratified by sex, age, and comorbidity compared between urinary tract infection (UTI) and non-UTI
VariablesUrinary tract infectionCrude HR (95% CI)Adjusted HR§ (95% CI)
NoYes
CasePYRateCasePYRate
  1. *< 0.05, **< 0.01, ***< 0.0001. †Incidence rate, per 10 000 person-years; ‡related hazard ratio; §multivariable analysis including age, sex, and comorbidities. CI, confidence interval; HR, related hazard ratio; PY, person-years.

All751 248 6550.60 187646 9602.89 4.80 (3.67, 6.28)***4.66 (3.55, 6.10)***
Sex
Female431 003 9820.4385523 2541.62 3.78 (2.62, 5.45)***1.00 (Reference)
Male32244 6731.31102123 7068.25 6.30 (4.24, 9.37)***2.78 (2.17, 3.56)***
Age
≤5014805 1090.1720421 8270.47 2.70 (1.37, 5.35)**1.00 (Reference)
51–6426265 3290.9866133 6664.94 5.04 (3.20, 7.94)***6.25 (4.16, 9.40)***
>6535178 2161.96 10191 46711.04 5.63 (3.83, 8.27)***11.8 (7.81, 17.8)***
Area of residence
Northern14513 7820.2743268 7781.60 5.83 (3.19, 10.6)***1.00 (Reference)
Medium10270 3080.3735139 9652.50 6.72 (3.33, 13.6)***1.27 (0.86, 1.88)
Southern43355 3171.2179182 1224.34 3.59 (2.47, 5.20)***2.55 (1.86, 3.49)***
Eastern8109 2480.733056 0955.35 7.30 (3.35, 15.9)***2.36 (1.56, 3.56)***
Comorbidity
Diabetes
No621 181 4170.52149586 8552.54 4.82 (3.58, 6.48)***1.00 (Reference)
Yes1367 2371.933860 1056.32 3.20 (1.70, 6.00)***1.13 (0.93, 1.66)
Hypertension
No451 061 0090.4287511 6301.70 3.99 (2.78, 5.72)***1.00 (Reference)
Yes30187 6461.60100135 3307.39 4.57 (3.04, 6.87)***1.37 (1.04, 1.80)*
Hyperlipidemia
No641 160 8340.55138570 2642.42 4.37 (3.25, 5.88)***1.00 (Reference)
Yes1187 8211.254976 6966.39 5.04 (2.62, 9.69)***1.27 (0.86, 1.88)

All the UTC HRs of the UTI cohort were significantly higher in the subgroups categorized by comorbidity than in the non-UTI cohort. Among these binary groups, the HR was higher in patients with hypertension (HR = 4.57, 95% CI = 3.04–6.87) and patients with hyperlipidemia (HR = 5.04, 95% CI = 2.62–9.69), but lower in patients with diabetes (HR = 3.20, 95% CI = 1.70–6.00), compared to their counterparts. However, adjusted HR was significantly higher only for patients with hypertension (adjusted HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.04–1.80).

When stratifying by time since UTI diagnosis, the incidence rates of UTC were higher in UTI patients than those in the non-UTI cohort within 4 years since UTI diagnosis, with adjusted HR = 7.73 (95% CI = 4.54–13.2; P < 0.0001). The significant differences were also observed in 4–8 years and over 8 years follow-up, although the HRs decreased over time (Fig. 1). Table 3 shows the incidence and crude and adjusted HR of UTC, renal pelvis and ureter, and bladder cancer associated with different sites of UTI. Lower UTI patients were generally at a higher risk of UTC than the non-UTI comparison cohort (adjusted HR = 4.96, 95% CI = 3.74–6.57). Upper UTI patients had a relatively higher risk of renal pelvis and ureter cancer (adjusted HR = 4.26, 95% CI = 2.51–7.22). Conversely, lower UTI patients had a relatively higher risk of bladder cancer (adjusted HR = 5.68, 95% CI = 3.91–8.25).

image

Figure 1. Probability of patients free of urinary tract cancer with urinary tract infection (UTI) (dashed line) or without UTI (solid line).

Download figure to PowerPoint

Table 3. Incidence, crude, and adjusted hazard ratios of urinary tract cancer, renal pelvis and ureter, and bladder cancer between different sites of urinary tract infection (UTI) locations
Variables (ICD-9-CM code)EventsPYRateCrude HR (95% CI)Adjusted HR § (95% CI)
  1. *P < 0.05, **< 0.01, ***P < 0.0001. †Incidence rate, per 10 000 person-years; ‡related hazard ratio; §multivariable analysis including age, sex, and comorbidities. CI, confidence interval; HR, related hazard ratio; ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification; PY, person-years.

Urinary tract cancer (188 and 189)
Non-UTI751 248 6550.601.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference)
Upper UTI (590)47173 3612.714.49 (3.11, 6.46)***3.79 (2.62, 5.47)***
Lower UTI (595)140473 6002.964.92 (3.71, 6.51)***4.96 (3.74, 6.57)***
Renal pelvis and ureter cancer (189.1 and 189.2)
Non-UTI341 248 6550.271.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference)
Upper UTI (590)24173 3611.385.04 (2.99, 8.50)***4.26 (2.51, 7.22)***
Lower UTI (595)53473 6001.124.11 (2.67, 6.32)***4.11 (2.66, 6.34)***
Bladder cancer (188)
Non-UTI411 248 6550.331.00 (Reference)1.00 (Reference)
Upper UTI (590)23173 3611.334.03 (2.42, 6.71)***3.41 (2.04, 5.72)***
Lower UTI (595)87473 6001.845.59 (3.86, 8.11)***5.68 (3.91, 8.25)***

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References

The results from this population-based cohort study showed a significant association between UTI and UTC risk. Further analyses indicated the presence of a correlation between sites of UTI and UTC. Furthermore, the increased UTC risks were consistently significant over time.

Data from the US National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results showed that overall cancer incidence rates of all racial and ethnic groups combined in the USA decreased by 0.8% per year between 2003 and 2007.[19] However, this trend is reversed in Taiwan. Malignant neoplasm has been the leading cause of death for the Taiwanese general population since 1982, and the age-adjusted incidence rate has steadily increased to 276 new cases per year and 100 000 diagnoses in 2008.[20] This issue remains a challenge for Taiwan's public health, gaining the attention of the government; thus, more population-based investigations regarding cancer-preventive epidemiology continue to occur. The NHI program provides adequate data for these studies because of its comprehensive health coverage. The NHIRD contains hospital service records, ambulatory service records, and prescription claims data, allowing investigators to select specific study groups and matched comparison groups with confirmed representation of the underlying population groups. Our research group recently carried out a cohort study using the NHIRD to evaluate the relationship between end-stage renal disease and subsequent cancer risk, and yielded positive results.[21] This study used a similar design to determine whether UTI is associated with UTC risk.

According to 2008 cancer statistics, bladder cancer is the 8th and 13th most common malignancy among Taiwanese men and women, respectively.[20] Numerous etiological factors are associated with the development of bladder cancer.[22] Cigarette smoking is the most important risk factor in industrialized countries. Furthermore, specific bladder cancer-causing chemicals and numerous occupational exposures to less-defined specific agents have been identified. Arsenic has been identified as a bladder carcinogen in Argentina, Chile, and Taiwan.[22, 23]

Infections from members of the genus Schistosoma are responsible for a high incidence of bladder cancer in developing countries, especially those in the Middle East and in parts of Africa.[10] Furthermore, non-specific UTI was also suggested as a potential risk factor for the development of bladder cancer.[8, 9] Most case–control studies support this and show a significantly higher risk for bladder cancer development in UTI patients,[24, 25] but several studies revealed no significant difference between case and control groups.[26, 27] Jiang et al.[12] showed that a significantly reduced risk of bladder cancer existed among women with a history of bladder infection. Cytotoxicity from commonly used antibiotics for treating bladder infections is a proposed explanation. The results from this study are consistent with most case–control studies and suggest that patients with UTI have a higher risk of developing UTC. When the site of infection was divided into upper and lower urinary tracts, both groups had a significantly higher risk of UTC, compared to the control group, but trends were more compatible within locations. This indicates that upper UTI is associated with a higher risk of renal pelvis and ureter cancers, and lower UTI is associated with a higher risk of bladder cancer.

Jhamb et al.[11] indicated that risk of bladder cancer was attenuated for infections diagnosed >1 year from the time of bladder cancer diagnosis. Gonzalez et al.[28] observed a similar phenomenon where the increased risk existed only for infections starting 4 years or less before diagnosis and no statistically significant increase in risk for infections starting five or more years before. Furthermore, they suggested that the association of UTI with bladder cancer may not exist. However, this study indicated that the UTC-free proportion of patients with and without UTI differed significantly even after 8 years of follow-up, although the adjusted HRs decreased over time (Fig. 1).

Our study is substantiated by the population-based design and its large and nationally representative sample. The results provide a realistic perspective for UTC incidence among UTI patients. However, there were certain limitations. First, information on potential confounding factors such as cigarette smoking and occupational exposure were unavailable for adjustment. Second, the NHIRD does not provide information regarding cancer histology type, and a definite relationship between bladder infection and bladder cancer has only been established for squamous cell carcinoma (as evidenced in cases of schistosomiasis)[10] and spinal cord injury patients who are prone to chronic UTI.[29] Kantor et al.[30] showed a positive association between UTI and bladder cancer, particularly for squamous cell carcinoma. An earlier study from Taiwan found 6.6% of bladder cancer cases involved squamous cell carcinoma.[31] This study was unable to ascertain whether more-than-average squamous cell carcinoma existed among bladder cancer patients. Despite a meticulous study design with adequate control of confounding factors, a crucial limitation is that bias may remain if there are unmeasured or unknown confounders. The UTI and UTC diagnosis data are otherwise highly reliable. These results are in agreement with those of most prior studies and suggest that patients with UTI are at a higher risk of developing UTC and the sites of infection and cancer are potentially predisposed. Increased UTC risks in UTI patients were observed to be consistently significant over time. Further large-scale properly controlled prospective studies exploring possible underlying mechanisms are necessary.

Acknowledgments

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References

This work was supported by the study projects (DMR-100-076 and DMR-100-077) in our hospital, the Taiwan Department of Health Clinical Trial and Research Center and for Excellence (DOH102-TD-B-111-004), the Taiwan Department of Health Cancer Research Center for Excellence (DOH102-TD-C-111-005), and the International Research-Intensive Centers of Excellence in Taiwan (I-RiCE) (NSC101-2911-I-002-303).

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Materials and Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. Disclosure Statement
  8. References
  • 1
    Dielubanza EJ, Schaeffer AJ. Urinary tract infections in women. Med Clin North Am 2011; 95: 2741.
  • 2
    Snow AN, Laudadio J. Human papillomavirus detection in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Adv Anat Pathol 2010; 17: 394403.
  • 3
    Chinchai T, Chansaenroj J, Swangvaree S, Junyangdikul P, Poovorawan Y. Prevalence of human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012; 22: 10638.
  • 4
    Chen JD, Yang HI, Iloeje UH et al. Risk evaluation of viral load elevation and associated liver disease/cancer in HBV (REVEAL-HBV) study group. Carriers of inactive hepatitis B virus are still at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death. Gastroenterology 2010; 5: 174754.
  • 5
    Lee MH, Yang HI, Lu SN et al. Hepatitis C virus seromarkers and subsequent risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term predictors from a community-based cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 30: 458793.
  • 6
    Chien YC, Chen JY, Liu MY et al. Serologic markers of Epstein-Barr virus infection and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwanese men. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 187782.
  • 7
    Forman D. Helicobacter pylori: the gastric cancer problem. Gut 1998; 43: S334.
  • 8
    Janković S, Radosavljević V. Risk factors for bladder cancer. Tumori 2007; 93: 412.
  • 9
    Michaud DS. Chronic inflammation and bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2007; 25: 2608.
  • 10
    Botelho MC, Machado JC, da Costa JM. Schistosoma haematobium and bladder cancer: what lies beneath? Virulence 2010; 1: 847.
  • 11
    Jhamb M, Lin J, Ballow R, Kamat AM, Grossman HB, Wu X. Urinary tract diseases and bladder cancer risk: a case-control study. Cancer Causes Control 2007; 18: 83945.
  • 12
    Jiang X, Castelao JE, Groshen S et al. Urinary tract infections and reduced risk of bladder cancer in Los Angeles. Br J Cancer 2009; 100: 8349.
  • 13
    Ross RK, Paganini-Hill A, Landolph J, Gerkins V, Henderson BE. Analgesics, cigarette smoking, and other risk factors for cancer of the renal pelvis and ureter. Cancer Res 1989; 49: 10458.
  • 14
    Korkes F, Silveira TS, Castro MG, Cuck G, Fernandes RC, Perez MD. Carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter. Int Braz J Urol 2006; 32: 64853; discussion 653-5.
  • 15
    Merk FB, Pauli BU, Jacobs JB, Alroy J, Friedell GH, Weinstein RS. Malignant transformation of urinary bladder in humans and in N-[4-(5-nitro-2-furyl)-2-thiazolyl]formamide-exposed Fischer rats: ultrastructure of the major components of the permeability barrier. Cancer Res 1977; 37: 284353.
  • 16
    Hicks RM, Walters CL, Elsebai I, Aasser AB, Merzabani ME, Gough TA. Demonstration of nitrosamines in human urine: preliminary observations on a possible etiology for bladder cancer in association with chronic urinary tract infections. Proc R Soc Med 1977; 70: 41317.
  • 17
    Yang MH, Chen KK, Yen CC et al. Unusually high incidence of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan. Urology 2002; 59: 6817.
  • 18
    Cheng TM. Taiwan's National Health Insurance system: high value for the dollar. In Okma KGH, Crivelli L, eds. Six Countries, Six Reform Models: The Health Reform Experience of Israel, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and Taiwan. New Jersey: World Scientific, 2009, pp.71204.
  • 19
    Kohler BA, Ward E, McCarthy BJ et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2007, featuring tumors of the brain and other nervous system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 71436.
  • 20
    Cancer Statistics Annual Report. Taiwan Cancer Registry. [Cited 27 Sep 2012.] Available from URL: http://tcr.cph.ntu.edu.tw/main.php?Page=N2
  • 21
    Liang JA, Sun LM, Yeh JJ, Sung FC, Chang SN, Kao CH. The association between malignancy and end-stage renal disease in Taiwan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2011; 41: 7527.
  • 22
    Johansson SL, Cohen SM. Epidemiology and etiology of bladder cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 1997; 13: 2918.
  • 23
    Chen YC, Su HJ, Guo YL et al. Arsenic methylation and bladder cancer risk in Taiwan. Cancer Causes Control 2003; 14: 30310.
  • 24
    Wynder EL, Onderdonk J, Mantel N. An epidemiological investigation of cancer of the bladder. Cancer 1963; 16: 1388407.
  • 25
    Dunham LJ, Rabson AS, Stewart HL, Frank AS, Young JL. Rates, interview, and pathology study of cancer of the urinary bladder in New Orleans, Louisiana. J Natl Cancer Inst 1968; 41: 683709.
  • 26
    Kjaer SK, Knudsen JB, Sørensen BL, Møller Jensen O. The Copenhagen case-control study of bladder cancer V. Review of the role of urinary-tract infection. Acta Oncol 1989; 28: 6316.
  • 27
    Piper JM, Matanoski GM, Tanascia J. Bladder cancer in young women. Am J Epidemiol 1986; 123: 103342.
  • 28
    Gonzalez CA, Errezola M, Izarzugaza I et al. Urinary infection, renal lithiasis and bladder cancer in Spain. Eur J Cancer 1991; 27: 498500.
  • 29
    Hess MJ, Zhan EH, Foo DK, Yalla SV. Bladder cancer in patients with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2003; 26: 3358.
  • 30
    Kantor AF, Hartge P, Hoover RN, Narayana AS, Sullivan JW, Fraumeni JF Jr. Urinary tract infection and risk of bladder cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 119: 51015.
  • 31
    Hsieh TS, Chen SS, Yang SD, Chen J, Chiu TY. Primary Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder. J Urol Ass ROC 1991; 2: 5929.