SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative G, Peto R, Davies C et al. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: Meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 2012; 379: 43244.
  • 2
    Colleoni M, Viale G, Zahrieh D et al. Chemotherapy is more effective in patients with breast cancer not expressing steroid hormone receptors: A study of preoperative treatment. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 66228.
  • 3
    Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Ravdin PM, Hayes MM, Gelmon KA. Ki67 in breast cancer: prognostic and predictive potential. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 17483.
  • 4
    Arriola E, Moreno A, Varela M et al. Predictive value of HER-2 and Topoisomerase IIalpha in response to primary doxorubicin in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42: 295460.
  • 5
    Colleoni M, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N et al. A nomogram based on the expression of Ki-67, steroid hormone receptors status and number of chemotherapy courses to predict pathological complete remission after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 221624.
  • 6
    Penault-Llorca F, Abrial C, Raoelfils I et al. Changes and predictive and prognostic value of the mitotic index, Ki-67, cyclin D1, and cyclo-oxygenase-2 in 710 operable breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Oncologist 2008; 13: 123545.
  • 7
    Jones RL, Salter J, A'Hern R et al. Relationship between oestrogen receptor status and proliferation in predicting response and long-term outcome to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 119: 31523.
  • 8
    von Minckwitz G, Sinn HP, Raab G et al. Clinical response after two cycles compared to HER2, Ki-67, p53, and bcl-2 in independently predicting a pathological complete response after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res 2008; 10: R30.
  • 9
    Hugh J, Hanson J, Cheang MC et al. Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 116876.
  • 10
    Penault-Llorca F, Andre F, Sagan C et al. Ki67 expression and docetaxel efficacy in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 280915.
  • 11
    Viale G, Regan MM, Mastropasqua MG et al. Predictive value of tumor Ki-67 expression in two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100: 20712.
  • 12
    Cheang MC, Chia SK, Voduc D et al. Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009; 101: 73650.
  • 13
    Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ. Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 173647.
  • 14
    Tsuda H, Kurosumi M, Umemura S, Yamamoto S, Kobayashi T, Osamura RY. HER2 testing on core needle biopsy specimens from primary breast cancers: interobserver reproducibility and concordance with surgically resected specimens. BMC Cancer 2010; 10: 534.
  • 15
    Umemura S, Osamura RY, Akiyama F et al. What causes discrepancies in HER2 testing for breast cancer? A Japanese ring study in conjunction with the global standard. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 130: 88391.
  • 16
    Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 1973; 33: 6139.
  • 17
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 15974.
  • 18
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346: 10857.
  • 19
    Sheri A, Dowsett M. Developments in Ki67 and other biomarkers for treatment decision making in breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2012; 23 (Suppl. 10): x21927.
  • 20
    Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 5287312.
  • 21
    Viale G, Giobbie-Hurder A, Regan MM et al. Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed Ki-67 labeling index in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: results from Breast International Group Trial 1-98 comparing adjuvant tamoxifen with letrozole. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 556975.
  • 22
    Bottini A, Berruti A, Bersiga A et al. Relationship between tumour shrinkage and reduction in Ki67 expression after primary chemotherapy in human breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2001; 85: 110612.
  • 23
    Veronese SM, Gambacorta M, Gottardi O, Scanzi F, Ferrari M, Lampertico P. Proliferation index as a prognostic marker in breast cancer. Cancer 1993; 71: 392631.
  • 24
    Jones RL, Salter J, A'Hern R et al. The prognostic significance of Ki67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 116: 5368.
  • 25
    DeCensi A, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Gandini S et al. Prognostic significance of Ki-67 labeling index after short-term presurgical tamoxifen in women with ER-positive breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 5827.
  • 26
    Dowsett M, Smith IE, Ebbs SR et al. Short-term changes in Ki-67 during neoadjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer with anastrozole or tamoxifen alone or combined correlate with recurrence-free survival. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 951s8s.
  • 27
    Nole F, Minchella I, Colleoni M et al. Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer with favorable prognostic factors: a pilot study evaluating the efficacy of a regimen with a low subjective toxic burden containing vinorelbine, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (FLN). Ann Oncol 1999; 10: 9936.
  • 28
    Dowsett M, Nielsen TO, A'Hern R et al. Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer working group. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 165664.