Traditional Chinese Medicine Science Research Funds Program of Zhejiang (2013ZA077); Natural Science Funds of Zhejiang (Y2110555); National 973 Basic Research Program of China (2013CB911300).
N1-guanyl-1,7-diaminoheptane sensitizes bladder cancer cells to doxorubicin by preventing epithelial–mesenchymal transition through inhibition of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A2 activation
Version of Record online: 7 JAN 2014
© 2013 The Authors. Cancer Science published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Volume 105, Issue 2, pages 219–227, February 2014
How to Cite
Cancer Sci 105 (2014) 219–227
- Issue online: 10 FEB 2014
- Version of Record online: 7 JAN 2014
- Accepted manuscript online: 22 NOV 2013 12:14AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 17 NOV 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 11 NOV 2013
- Manuscript Received: 14 JUL 2013
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Science Research Funds Program of Zhejiang. Grant Number: 2013ZA077
- Natural Science Funds of Zhejiang. Grant Number: Y2110555
- National 973 Basic Research Program of China. Grant Number: 2013CB911300
Total views by type:
Publication date: 7 Jan 2014. Cumulative views from 7 Jan 2014 - 1 Jan 2017.
- Total views: 1470
- Total PDF views: 661
- Total HTML views: 809
- * Although we update our data on a daily basis (not in real time), there may be a 48-hour delay before the most recent numbers are available.
About this data
Usage data should be viewed in relation to:
- the publication date (older articles will generally have higher usage).
- the relevance of the article to a broad community (some articles will be extremely important but to smaller sections of the research community), and
- the availability and usage of the article through other sources
Article usage data is not a precise measure of an individual article's importance and should only be considered alongside other measures of visibility/importance.