Get access

A Critical Examination of Mindblindness as a Metaphor for Autism

Authors


  • Janette Dinishak, Department of Philosophy, University of California, Santa Cruz; Nameera Akhtar, Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz. We would like to thank Jonathan Ellis, Vikram Jaswal, and Helen Tager-Flusberg for their helpful comments and discussion.

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Janette Dinishak, Department of Philosophy or Nameera Akhtar, Department of Psychology, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064; e-mail: jdinisha@ucsc.edu or nakhtar@ucsc.edu.

Abstract

Metaphor—describing one thing in terms of another—is a common tool used to grasp what is unknown. Perhaps because we do not understand a lot about autism, many metaphors appear in both scientific and nonscientific descriptions of autism. The metaphor of mindblindness is especially pervasive in the scientific literature. We discuss three limitations of this metaphor: It obscures the fact that both autistic and non autistic individuals contribute to the social and communicative difficulties between them, it carries strong negative connotations, and it may impede the recognition that some autistic behaviors are meaningful and adaptive. Researchers should be mindful of the potential consequences of metaphors.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary