SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Joon-Ho Yu, Tanya M. Harrell, Seema M. Jamal, Holly K. Tabor, Michael J. Bamshad, Attitudes of Genetics Professionals Toward the Return of Incidental Results from Exome and Whole-Genome Sequencing, The American Journal of Human Genetics, 2014, 95, 1, 77

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    The-Hung Bui, Frances Lucy Raymond, Ignatia B. Van den Veyver, Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 2: should incidental findings arising from prenatal testing always be reported to patients?, Prenatal Diagnosis, 2014, 34, 1
  3. 3
    Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Colleen A Campbell, The role of patient engagement in personalized healthcare, Personalized Medicine, 2014, 11, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    K.A. Strong, K.L. Zusevics, D. Bick, R. Veith, Views of primary care providers regarding the return of genome sequencing incidental findings, Clinical Genetics, 2014, 86, 3
  5. 5
    Janet K Williams, Martha Driessnack, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Nancy Downing, Christian Simon, Disclosure of incidental genomic findings involving children: are we making progress?, Personalized Medicine, 2013, 10, 6, 519

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Janet K. Williams, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack, Nancy R. Downing, Christian Simon, The Importance of Patient Engagement, Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 2013, 17, 9, 649

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Susanne B. Haga, Jennifer Q. Zhao, 2013,

    CrossRef