SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Molecular characteristics of ECM and bacterial MSCRAMM proteins
  5. Conclusion and perspectives
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

The extracellular matrix (ECM) is present within all animal tissues and organs. Actually, it surrounds the eukaryotic cells composing the four basic tissue types, i.e. epithelial, muscle, nerve and connective. ECM does not solely refer to connective tissue but composes all tissues where its composition, structure and organization vary from one tissue to another. Constituted of the four main fibrous proteins, i.e. collagen, fibronectin, laminin and elastin, ECM components form a highly structured and functional network via specific interactions. From the basement membrane to interstitial matrix, further heterogeneity exists in the organization of the ECM in various tissues and organs also depending on their physiological state. Back to a molecular level, bacterial proteins represent the most significant part of the microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM). These cell surface proteins are secreted and localized differently in monoderm and diderm–LPS bacteria. While one collagen-binding domain (CBD) and different fibronectin-binding domains (FBD1 to 8) have been registered in databases, much remains to be learned on specific binding to other ECM proteins via single or supramolecular protein structures. Besides theinteraction of bacterial proteins with individual ECM components, this review aims at stressing the importance of fully considering the ECM at supramolecular, cellular, tissue and organ levels. This conceptual view should not be overlooked to rigorously comprehend the physiology of bacterial interaction from commensal to pathogenic species.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Molecular characteristics of ECM and bacterial MSCRAMM proteins
  5. Conclusion and perspectives
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

The extracellular matrix (ECM) constitutes a protein complex, whose composition and structural organization influence numerous biological processes such as adhesion, migration, proliferation or differentiation of eukaryotic cells (Patti et al., 1994). As a ubiquitous constituent of animal tissues, the ECM can also serve as a substrate for the attachment of colonizing microorganisms, in the case of an infection for instance. Animals are complex organisms with a structured organization. Three levels of organization have been identified: cell, tissue and organ. A group of cells from a same origin and function form a tissue, and the assembly of different tissues leads to the formation of an organ. Four basic tissue types can be differentiated: (i) nervous; (ii) muscle; (iii) epithelial and (iv) connective. The primary role of the ECM is to support and link the cells and tissues, although it is much more than a structuring tissue component. Two main classes of macromolecules constitute the ECM: (i) the fibrous proteins and (ii) the proteoglycans. Most ECM proteins are large and complex, with multiple distinct domains, but are highly conserved among different taxa.

Bacteria secrete proteins that can be expressed at the cell surface to specifically interact with components of the ECM. These proteins are qualified of MSCRAMM (microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules). The study of MSCRAMMs necessitates an in-depth understanding and awareness not only of the ECM components but also of the cell biology. While the specific interaction with the ECM components and bacterial cells occurs at a molecular level through protein–protein interaction, the structure and organization of the different ECM components also have to be considered at molecular, cellular, tissue and even organ level. Such aspects must not be overlooked to rigorously comprehend the bacterial interaction with the ECM in an infected host for instance. Besides an update of the bacterial protein cell surface determinants involved in adhesion to ECM components, the present review aims at providing key information on the cell biology of ECM (composition, structure and organization) in order to bring clarity in an area where the differences at molecular, cellular and tissue levels can be a source of confusion.

Molecular characteristics of ECM and bacterial MSCRAMM proteins

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Molecular characteristics of ECM and bacterial MSCRAMM proteins
  5. Conclusion and perspectives
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

The MSCRAMM proteins localize at the interface between the bacterial cell and its surroundings, i.e. the cell surface. This necessarily implies the translocation of the proteins via protein secretion systems across one (monoderm) or two (diderm) biological membranes depending on the cell envelope architecture (Desvaux, 2006; Desvaux et al., 2009). These secreted proteins possess targeting sequences for correct routing and post-translational modifications, e.g. N-terminal signal peptides for protein substrates to the Sec translocon or C-terminal LPXTG domain for covalent anchoring to bacterial cell wall by sortase. Cell surface-exposed proteins localize differentially in monoderm and diderm–LPS (lipopolysaccharide) bacteria (Desvaux et al., 2006; Sutcliffe, 2010).

In bacteria, molecular characterization of the protein domains interacting with ECM is essentially available for the main fibrous ECM glycoproteins components, i.e. collagen, fibronectin, laminin and elastin (Table 1). Nonetheless, it must be stressed that other numerous functionally important proteins, such as proteoglycans, are present and exert significant pleiotropic effects. Proteoglycans are categorized into three main families (Schaefer and Schaefer, 2010): (i) SLRP (small leucine-rich proteoglycans); (ii) modular proteoglycans and (iii) cell surface membrane-associated proteoglycans. The glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains of proteoglycans are composed of repeated disaccharides. These unbranched GAG chains can be discriminated into sulfated and non-sulfated ones. Hyaluronic acid is the only GAG that is not attached to a core protein. The sulfation of GAG chains frequently varies even within the same GAG molecule, and the number and length of GAG chains in a same core protein can also differ dramatically, which results in the highly heterogeneous nature of proteoglycans. Proteoglycans are the space fillers in the ECM that bridge the different components and form a highly hydrated gel-like substance. This substance is responsible for the volume of the ECM and is also resistant to compression.

Table 1. Structural, supramolecular and localization features of the main ECM components and their respective bacterial ECM-binding domains
ECM componentsaTypebStructureSupramolecular organizationcLocalizationdBacterial ECM-binding domainse
  1. a

    The different subcategories of the main fibrous ECM components, i.e. collagen, fibronectin, laminin and elastin. FFC, fibril-forming collagen; BFFC, beaded filaments-forming collagen; FACIT, fibril-associated collagen with interrupted triple helices; MACIT, membrane-associated collagen with interrupted triple helices; NFC, network-forming collagen; MPC, Multiplexin collagen; S-fibronectin, soluble fibronectin or plasma fibronectin; I-fibronectin, insoluble fibronectin or cellular fibronectin.

  2. b

    Different types of collagens and laminin isoforms. For laminin-111, for example, 111 means an α1β1γ1 composition. n/a, not applicable.

  3. c

    For more detailed information on the interactions between the different ECM components, refer to the main text. (*) For the different types of collagen it refers to, check out the first part of the table.

  4. d

    Localization related to the different specialized forms of ECM in tissues. IM, interstitial matrix; BM, basement membrane; PM, plasma matrix.

  5. e

    Characterized domains specifically involved in the adhesion to ECM components. Identification number from InterPro (IPR) database is given in brackets. For the different types of collagen, the specificity of the collagen-binding domain (CBD) remains unclear. A similar comment applies for the specificity of the different types of fibronectin-binding domain (FBD) towards the s-fibronectin. n/a, not available.

FFCI, II, III, V, XI, XXIV, XXVIIHomo/heterotrimer

FACIT

Elastin

I-fibronectin

Decorin

IMCBD (IPR008456)
FACITIX, XII, XIV, XVI, XIX, XX, XXI, XXIIHomo/heterotrimerFFCIM
MPCXV, XVIIIHomotrimer

I-fibronectin

Laminin

BM
NFCIV, VIII, XHomo/heterotrimer

Laminin

Perlecan

IM
BFFCVI, VII, XXVI, XXVIIIHeterotrimerFFCBM
MACITXIII, XVII, XXIII, XXVHomotrimer

I-fibronectin

Nidogen

Perlecan

BM
 
S-fibronectinn/aCovalent homodimer PM

FBD1 (IPR011252)

FBD2 (IPR011266)

FBD3 (IPR008616)

FBD4 (IPR011490)

FBD5 (IPR004237)

FBD6 (IPR010801)

FBD7 (IPR021021)

FBD8 (IPR010841)

I-fibronectin

Integrin

Collagenc

IM

BM

 
Laminin111, 121, 211, 212/222, 213, 221, 3A11, 3A21, 3A32, 3A33, 3B32, 411, 421, 423, 511, 521, 522, 523Heterotrimer

Integrin

Collagenc

Proteoglycans

Nidogen

Perlecan

Tenascin

BMn/a
 
Elastinn/aMultimer

Proteoglycans

Collagenc

Fibulin

Fibrillin

IMn/a

While ECM is sometimes misleadingly referred to the sole connective tissue, all tissues are composed of an ECM. To rigorously comprehend the bacterial interaction with the fibrous ECM proteins, it is not only important to consider the specific protein–protein interactions occurring at a molecular level but also the supramolecular organization and localization of ECM in tissue.

Supramolecular organization of the ECM components

While fibrous ECM components can be roughly represented as immersed in a gel composed of proteoglycans to form a complex amorphous matrix, specific interactions occur between the different components resulting in a highly structured and functional network (Vakonakis and Campbell, 2007) (Fig. 1). This molecular knitting results in a very complex matrix, whose supramolecular organization is still not fully resolved and understood as yet.

figure

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the (A) molecular structure and (B) supramolecular organization in tissue of the main ECM components. More detailed information on structure and supramolecular organization of ECM components can be found in the main text and is also summarized in Table 1. FFC, fibril-forming collagen; BFFC, beaded filaments-forming collagen; FACIT, fibril-associated collagen with interrupted triple helices; MACIT, membrane-associated collagen with interrupted triple helices; NFC, network-forming collagen; MPC, multiplexin collagen; PM, plasma membrane; BM, basement membrane; IM, interstitial matrix.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Collagens provide the scaffold for the attachment of other ECM components (Orgel et al., 2011). The different types of fibril-forming collagens (FFCs) (Table 1) assembled to form fibres. While beaded filaments-forming collagens (BFFCs) interact with FFCs, FACITs (fibril-associated collagens with interrupted triple helices) associate all along the surface of collagen fibres (Fig. 1B). Multiplexin collagens (MPCs) attach to the fibronectin and to a lesser extent to laminin (Hurskainen et al., 2010). Besides, MACITs (membrane-associated collagens with interrupted triple helices) connect the cell and the ECM via a short N-terminal intracellular domain, a plasma membrane anchoring transmembrane domain and a collagenous ectodomain, which binds fibronectin, nidogen and perlecan. These different collagen types anchored fibronectin or laminin, but also interact with cell surface receptors, such as integrins, through which a number of cellular function can be controlled (Leitinger, 2011).

Fibronectin provides a molecular bridge between the collagen scaffold and the other ECM components (Fig. 1). Besides interaction with collagen, the fibronectin modules contain binding sites for the cell surface receptor integrins but also other ECM components, e.g. fibulin, thrombospondin, fibrin or tenascin (Schultz and Wysocki, 2009). Tenascin modulates adhesion to fibronectin and also interacts with proteoglycans, e.g. perlecan, and integrins (Orend et al., 2003). Interactions with plasma fibronectin, however, are mediated via glycosylations. Integrins are transmembrane proteins that mediate attachment of cell to the ECM and have a role of signal transduction from the ECM to the cell (Geiger and Yamada, 2011). Besides collagen and fibronectin, integrins also bind laminin. While representing the largest family of cell surface receptors, several other surface cellular receptors than integrins are also involved in binding of ECM components (Heino and Kapyla, 2009).

Actually, laminins bind numerous proteoglycans and collagens, especially network-forming collagens (NFCs) (Durbeej, 2010) (Fig. 1). Nidogens interact with fibulin and other numerous ECM proteins including elastin (de Vega et al., 2009). Elastin, which proportionally provides a degree of elasticity to the ECM, further exhibits molecular interaction sites with proteoglycans, fibulin and fibrillin (Hayes et al., 2011). These molecules associate together into microfibrils and associate with tropoelastin to form elastic fibres further associated to other ECM molecules such as full-circle collagens (Fig. 1). This further stresses that ECM supramolecular structures are composite biological amalgamates of co-polymers that differ in their identity and relative abundance (Bruckner, 2010).

Extracellular matrix localization in tissue

Besides this generic supramolecular organization, some specificity arises when considering ECM in various tissues. From one tissue to another and even within one tissue type, depending on its physiological state for instance, the ECM organization varies tremendously. While in ordinary connective tissues ECM components are synthesized by fibroblasts, ECM components can be secreted by the specific cells composing a given tissue. For example, muscle fibres secrete ECM components in the course of myogenesis, collagen IV is expressed by epithelial cells or Schawn cells biosynthesize fibronectin in nervous tissues. The ECM has two basic forms in tissue: (i) the basement membrane (BM), also called basal lamina and (ii) the interstitial matrix (IM) (Fig. 1). In some connective tissues such as blood or lymph tissues, the matrix is fluid and called plasma.

The BM is present at the basis of epithelial and connective tissues where it separates the underlying tissue (Yurchenco, 2011). The BM can be further divided into lucida, densa and reticular laminae. Laminins are major components of BM and are not present in the IM (Fig. 1). BM forms a complexed, structured and connected network that further contains proteoglycans (essentially perlecan and nidogen) and collagens, especially the non-fibrillar-forming collagen IV (Table 1). Collagen IV forms a network that constitutes the BM and collagen VII serves as an anchor to it (Amano et al., 2001). The functional diversity of BM arises from the molecular diversity of collagen and laminin isoforms as well as the minor constituents.

The IM composition greatly depends on the tissue and interstitial compartment considered, e.g. it is essentially collagen in connective tissue or fibronectin and vitronectin in blood tissue. In this last, fibulin binds to fibrinogen and incorporates into clots. The most developed part of the ECM is located in the connective tissues. In dense connective tissues, such as cartilage and tendon, almost all the space between the cells is filled by fibrillar collagens, representing 60–85% of the dry weight of these tissues. In articular cartilage, collagen II is the principal component but proteoglycans, e.g. decorin, also contribute to the IM (Fox et al., 2009). This IM composition greatly contributes to the high water content of the IM.

Collagen and collagen-binding proteins

To date, 28 different types of collagens (from I to XXVIII) have been described (Ricard-Blum, 2011) (Table 1). Collagens I to V account for the types the most commonly encountered. Collagens always assemble from three type-specific α chains to form triple-helical protomers (Fig. 1). The triple helix domains are alternated with non-helical domains depending on the specific type of collagen. The degree of hydrolyxation and glycosylation of hydroxylysine residues depends on the collagen type but also varies with tissues and ageing. Basically, collagens can form diverse supramolecular structures (Table 1), namely fibrils (FFC), networks (NFC), beaded filaments (BFFC), MACITs, FACITs or multiplexins (MPC). Collagens provide scaffolding for the attachment of some other ECM components.

The collagen-binding domain (CBD) was originally identified and characterized in Cna (collagen adhesin) from Staphylococcus aureus. Most recent investigation proposed that collagen docking follows a dynamic multistep binding model, called the collagen hug (Zong et al., 2005). The CBD (IPR008456) is about 160-amino-acid long with a jelly-roll fold composed of two α helices and two antiparallel β sheets. CBD is often associated with collagen B-type domains (IPR008454 and IPR008970), which do not mediate adhesion to collagen but are required for functional protein conformation by putting the CBD away from the bacteria cell surface (Deivanayagam et al., 2000). Of note, CBD belongs to the structural superfamily of bacterial adhesion domain (IPR008966). According to IPR v36.0, the large majority of CBDs are found in proteins from bacteria of the phylum Firmicutes and, at a much lesser extent, in the phylum Actinobacteria and also some diderm–LPS bacteria. As a general trend observed in Cna, CBD enables strong binding to collagen I but there are differences from one collagen-binding protein to another. For instance, binding of Acm (adhesin of collagen from Enterococcus faecium) to collagen I is greater than IV (Nallapareddy et al., 2003). Cne adheres to native interstitial collagen of types I, II and III but not to collagen IV (van Wieringen et al., 2010). CbpA (collagen-binding protein A) binds quite similarly to collagens I–IV and XI and to a lesser extent to collagens V and IX (Pietrocola et al., 2007).

Besides CBD, some other domains involved in collagen binding have been described but no pattern/profile is as yet available in databases. Streptococcocal M proteins mediate high-affinity interaction with collagen IV via an N-terminal PARF (peptide associated with rheumatic fever) motif (Reissmann et al., 2012). The N-terminal region of CbsA (collagen-binding S-layer protein A) binds to collagens I and IV (Antikainen et al., 2002). In diderm–LPS bacteria, the trimeric autotransporter YadA (Yersinia adhesin A) forms a lollipop-shaped structure, whose conformation is absolutely required for binding to collagens I, II, III, IV, V and XI. The collagen-binding activity resides within the central and C-terminal portion of the head domain and the interaction involves NSVAIG–S repeats (Tahir et al., 2000). For several reported collagen-binding proteins (CgBPs), the domain responsible for specific adhesion to collagens still remains to be determined, e.g. p26 (protein of 26 kDa) (Howard et al., 2000), the M-like protein FoG (fibrinogen-binding protein of G streptococci) (Nitsche et al., 2006), Lsa63 (leptospiral surface adhesin of 63 kDa) (Vieira et al., 2010) or EhaB (enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli autotransporter B) (Wells et al., 2009).

Fibronectin and fibronectin-binding proteins

Fibronectins are generally dimers covalently linked by a pair of disulfide bonds near their carboxyl termini (Pankov and Yamada, 2002) (Fig. 1). Fibronectins have a modular architecture composed of a combination of three different types of homologous domains, i.e. types I (FnI; IPR000083), II (FnII; IPR000562) and III (FnIII; IPR003961). These repeating modules are all primarily composed of antiparallel β strand. FnI is the most conserved region of fibronectin among different taxa. Modules FnI1–5 constitutes a heparin-binding domain (HBD) and FnI6–9 a gelatin/collagen-binding domain (GBD) (Erat et al., 2009). FnII is involved in the binding to collagen. Contrary to the two other domains, FnIII cannot form inter- or intramolecular disulfide bonds but constitutes the largest part of the fibronectin. The presence/absence of these extra domains A (EDA) and B (EDB) results in two variations of fibronectins: (i) insoluble fibronectin (i-fibronectin), also called cellular fibronectin, contains variable proportion of EDA and EDB and (ii) the soluble form (s-fibronectin), also called plasma fibronectin, lacks these alternative spliced type III domains and is present in the ECM of some connective tissues, e.g. the plasma matrix in blood or lymph tissues. S-fibronectin can shift to fibrils upon binding to integrins. In any case, the fibronectins have rod-like structure and, with many molecular binding sites, play a key role in cell adhesion (Pankov and Yamada, 2002).

Contrary to collagen binding, eight different bacterial domains involved in adhesion to fibronectin are registered in databases. To ease the description, a classification of the fibronectin-binding domains (FBDs) from types 1 to 8 is proposed.

FBD1 (IPR011252) has a β-sandwich topology as resolute in the first fibronectin γ-chain-binding S. aureus adhesin, ClfA (clumping factor A) (Deivanayagam et al., 2002). As determined in SdrG (serine-aspartate repeat-containing protein G), this domain binds to its ligand with a dynamic ‘dock, lock and latch’ mechanism (Ponnuraj et al., 2003). FBD1 is generally found in tandem with FBD2 (IPR011266), as in the two major fibronectin adhesins of S. aureus, FnBPA (fibronectin-binding protein A) and FnBPB. FBD1 is essentially found within species of the phyla Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. FBD2 is exclusively found among bacteria of the phylum Firmicutes with the vast majority belonging to the genera Staphylococcus and Streptococcus.

FBD3 (IPR008616) was originally characterized in FbpA (fibronectin-binding protein A) from Streptococcus gordonii (Christie et al., 2002), an orthologue to Fbp54 (fibronectin-binding protein of 54 kDa) and PavA (pneumococcal adhesion and virulence protein A) form. While FBD3 is also involved in binding to fibrinogen, it interacts with fibronectin at the HBD. Interestingly, the ability to bind soluble fibronectin would vary from one fibronectin-binding protein (FnBP) to another; e.g. PavA cannot but Fbp54 can bind the soluble form (Henderson et al., 2011). With 1160 species, FBD3 is the most largely distributed FBD in bacteria. It is mostly found within the phylum Firmicutes including the class Clostridia (Desvaux et al., 2005), but it is also present in the phyla Proteobacteria (classes ε- and δ-proteobacteria), Cyanobacteria or Spirochaetes.

FBD4, the FIVAR (found in various architectures) repeat (IPR011490), forms α-helical bundles allowing specific interaction with fibronectin. In EcmbP (ECM-binding protein), it was demonstrated to interact with FnIII module (Christner et al., 2010). FBD4 is essentially present in the phylum Firmicutes. Besides Actinobacteria, it is also identified in the phyla Thermotogae and Bacteroidetes.

FBD5 (IPR004237) is certainly the domain having attracted the most interest (Henderson et al., 2011). It is exclusively found in the phylum Firmicutes, essentially the genera Staphylococcus and Streptococcus. Each FBD5 repeat is an array that binds to FnI modules in HBD and where a change of conformation occurs upon interaction following a tandem β-zipper model (Bingham et al., 2008). Of note, this domain can be found in conjunction with FBD1 and FBD2, e.g. in FnBPA and FnBPB.

FBD6 (IPR010801) was originally identified in Fap (fibronectin attachment protein) from Mycobacterium, and is quite restricted to this genus. FBD6 binds to fibronectin HBD. FBD7, or SSURE (streptococcal surface repeat) domain (IPR021021), was first uncovered in SP0082 from Streptococcus pneumonia (Bumbaca et al., 2004). FBD7 is exclusively found in bacterial species of the phylum Firmicutes, essentially genus Streptococcus. FBD8 (IPR010841) was originally identified in Listeria monocytogenes Lmo0721, i.e. FbpB (fibronectin binding protein B) (Gilot and Content, 2002). FBD8 is essentially present in phylum Firmicutes and in a couple of species of the phyla Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Chloroflexi. Structural information in terms of protein folding and site-specific recognition of fibronectin is still awaited for FBD7 and FBD8.

Interestingly enough, several FnBPs are also CgBPs, e.g. RspA (Rhusiopathiae surface protein A) harbours both a FBD1 and a CBD and also binds to polystyrene (Shimoji et al., 2003). Of note, the involvement of MAP (MHC class II analogous protein) domain (IPR005298) in specific binding to fibronectin remains to be ascertained. Besides FBDs, some other domains involved in fibronectin binding have been described but no pattern/profile is as yet available in databases (Henderson et al., 2011), e.g. EWYYQ motif in antigen 85B, FRLS motif in CadF (Campylobacter adhesin to fibronectin), glutamine-rich motifs in Hlp3 (HMW3-like protein) and PlpA (pneumoniae-like protein A), terminal immunoglobulin (Ig)-like repeats (IPR003343) in LigA (Leptospira immunoglobulin-like protein A) and LigB, or the motif within the 46–205 residues of Bbk32 (Borrelia burgdorferi protein encoded by locus bbk32). In some YadA proteins, an N-terminal motif (termed the uptake domain) in the head region can be present and mediate tight binding to fibronectin (Heise and Dersch, 2006).

Additional uncharacterized regions are also known to interact with fibronectin (Henderson et al., 2011), e.g. C-terminus of LipL32 (leptospira lipoprotein of 32 kDa), central region of Cha (cell surface high molecular weight adhesin of Granulicatella adiacens) or N-terminal of RevA (reverse strand encoding protein A). In some other FnBPs, structure–function analyses are still awaited, e.g. UafB (uroadherance factor B) (King et al., 2011).

Laminin and laminin-binding proteins

Laminins are heterotrimers composed of three distinct subunits, called α, β and γ, linked together by disulfide bonds (Durbeej, 2010). Chain variations of the subunits, as well as alternatively spliced variants, have been uncovered with five α, three β and three γ chains. The nomenclature of laminins is based on the number of three different subunits composing them; e.g. laminin-111 has an α1β1γ1 composition. To date, 18 distinct laminin isoforms based on different arrangements of the subunits have been identified. This large supramolecular structure (400–900 kDa) can form either cruciform, Y-shaped or rod-shaped heterotrimeric structures. Within the ECM, laminins form a network with a web-like structure. The laminin network assembled through polymerization, in which the primary interactions lead to a trimer formation by the binding of three different laminins. By binding to several other proteins, laminins are key components leading to a highly cross-linked ECM.

Contrary to collagen and especially fibronectin, no laminin-binding domain is currently registered in databases. Nonetheless, several protein regions are known to confer specific adhesion to laminin. The CgBP CbsA can also bind to laminin via its N-terminal region (Antikainen et al., 2002). With the absence of the uptake domain, YadA gains adhesion potential to collagen but also laminin (Heise and Dersch, 2006). While structure–function analysis remains to be performed, laminin binding has been reported for several additional proteins, e.g. EhaB (enterohemorrhagic E. coli autotransporteur A) (Wells et al., 2009), Tp0136 (Treponema pallidum protein encoded by locus tp0136) (Brinkman et al., 2008), OmpL47 (outer membrane protein of Leptospira of 47 kDa) (Pinne et al., 2010) or Lsa24 (leptospiral surface adhesin of 24 kDa), Lsa27 and Lsa63 (Vieira et al., 2010).

Elastin and elastin-binding proteins

The assembly of monomeric precursor tropoelastin results in the formation of polymeric elastin (Muiznieks et al., 2010). Tropoelastin alternates hydrophobic and cross-linking domains. Hydrophobic domain is essentially composed of G, V, P and A residues, which are arranged into motifs responsible for structural disorder and are directly involved into a self-association process called coaservation. The hydrophobic domains play a crucial role in the elastic property. The cross-linking domains are predominantly composed of lysine, which permits the covalent association of tropoelastin monomers as a result of lysyl oxidase activity. This is the association tropoelastins by weak and covalent interactions, via hydrophobic and cross-linking domains, respectively, that result in the formation of elastin.

Similarly to laminin, bacterial protein domains responsible for specific binding to elastin have not attracted a lot of attention, which is in mark contrast with fibronectin. In the membrane protein EbpS (elastin-binding protein of S. aureus), the motif TNSHQD is the minimum sequences required for recognition and binds to the N-terminal 30 kDa region of elastin (Park et al., 1999). In FnBPA, the FBD1-2 region was shown to display adhesion properties against elastin in addition to fibronectin (Keane et al., 2007). In LigB, the Ig-like repeats are involved in charge–charge interactions with elastin (Lin et al., 2009). While structure–function analysis is awaited, OmpL37 demonstrates a pronounced specificity for elastin (Pinne et al., 2010).

Bacterial cell surface supramolecular protein structures interacting with ECM components

In diderm–LPS bacteria, several protein secretion systems are involved in assembly of pili, some of them have been demonstrated to interact with ECM components (Desvaux et al., 2009). Besides pili, H6 and H7 flagella have been demonstrated to mediate specific adhesion to collagen, laminin and fibronectin (Erdem et al., 2007).

In diderm–LPS bacteria, the type 4 pilus HCP binds specifically laminin and fibronectin but not collagen (Ledesma et al., 2010). P-fimbriae have been demonstrated to bind fibronectin (Westerlund et al., 1991) as well as type 1 fimbriae, whose ability to bind fibronectin HBD and GBD is strain-dependent and results of sequence heterogeneity in fimbrilin FimH (Sokurenko et al., 1994). In FimA, the binding motif was identified (Murakami et al., 1996). In AafA (aggregative adherent fimbrilin A) binding was demonstrated to occur at the glycosylated group (Farfan et al., 2008). Lpf (long polar fimbriae) have been reported to adhere to PEYER patch and intestinal cells by attachment to fibronectin, but also collagen IV and laminin (Farfan et al., 2011). The DraE (Dr haemagglutinin) member of Afa (afimbrial adhesin) family forms fimbriae and binds collagen IV (Korotkova et al., 2006). Curli allows specific interactions with laminin and fibronectin (Zogaj et al., 2003).

In monoderm bacteria, Ebp (endocarditis- and biofilm-associated pilus) contributes to adhesion to collagen and fibrinogen (Nallapareddy et al., 2011). Mtp (Mycobacterium tuberculosis pili) bind to laminin (Alteri et al., 2007). The major adhesin subunit of the protofilament, RrgA (RlrA-regulated gene A), shows pronounced binding against collagen I, laminin, fibronectin and fibrinogen (Hilleringmann et al., 2008).

Conclusion and perspectives

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Molecular characteristics of ECM and bacterial MSCRAMM proteins
  5. Conclusion and perspectives
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

While ECM shares some general features, its composition, structure and organization greatly varies from one tissue to another. The proportion and organization of the different tissue strongly differ from one organ to another. Besides, the ageing also impacts on the composition of the ECM in the tissues. This high heterogeneity from molecular, cellular, tissue and organ levels is often overlooked and should be carefully considered when interpreting and investigating the physiology of bacterial interaction with ECM components.

FnBPs have clearly attracted the most interest leading to the identification of eight different FBDs. The need for further investigations is quite pronounced for CgBPs with only one CBD identified and especially laminin- or elastin-binding domain with no pattern/profile as yet described. Bacterial adhesion to some other ECM components has been reported such as fibrinogen, plasminogen, vitronectin or tenascin as well as some proteoglycans such as decorin or nidogen. It must be stressed that several primarily cytoplasmic proteins have now been demonstrated to bind some ECM components and a specific ECM-binding site has even been identified, e.g. in the malate synthase of M. tuberculosis to laminin or in enolase from S. pneumonia to the plasmin(ogen).

From the phylogenetic distribution, it clearly appears that ECM-binding proteins are not restricted to pathogenic species, which suggests a physiological and ecological role beyond the sole infection of a host. Adhesion and colonization of host tissue are a crucial step not only in the course of an infection but also in the interaction of commensal bacteria in their ecological niche. The stability and ubiquity of ECM in animal tissues have provided a structural support of choice with which numerous bacterial species must have evolved. Regarding the other numerous ECM components, plentiful of investigations lay ahead to identify and characterize the ECM-binding proteins responsible for adherence. This is a promise for exciting new development in the field of bacterial adhesion to ECM in the very near future.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Molecular characteristics of ECM and bacterial MSCRAMM proteins
  5. Conclusion and perspectives
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

This work was supported by INRA (French National Institute for Agronomical Research) with the MICEL project funded by the inter-department CEPIA/MICA (Science and Process Engineering of Agricultural Products/Microbiology and Food Chain) AIP (‘Action Incitative Programmée’). Caroline Chagnot is a PhD Research Fellow granted by the ‘Région Auvergne – FEDER (Fonds Européen de Développement Régional)’. We sincerely apologize to the many authors whose relevant work could not be cited owing to space restrictions.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Summary
  3. Introduction
  4. Molecular characteristics of ECM and bacterial MSCRAMM proteins
  5. Conclusion and perspectives
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  • Alteri, C.J., Xicohtencatl-Cortes, J., Hess, S., Caballero-Olin, G., Giron, J.A., and Friedman, R.L. (2007) Mycobacterium tuberculosis produces pili during human infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 51455150.
  • Amano, S., Akutsu, N., Matsunaga, Y., Nishiyama, T., Champliaud, M.F., Burgeson, R.E., and Adachi, E. (2001) Importance of balance between extracellular matrix synthesis and degradation in basement membrane formation. Exp Cell Res 271: 249262.
  • Antikainen, J., Anton, L., Sillanpaa, J., and Korhonen, T.K. (2002) Domains in the S-layer protein CbsA of Lactobacillus crispatus involved in adherence to collagens, laminin and lipoteichoic acids and in self-assembly. Mol Microbiol 46: 381394.
  • Bingham, R.J., Rudino-Pinera, E., Meenan, N.A., Schwarz-Linek, U., Turkenburg, J.P., Hook, M., et al. (2008) Crystal structures of fibronectin-binding sites from Staphylococcus aureus FnBPA in complex with fibronectin domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 1225412258.
  • Brinkman, M.B., McGill, M.A., Pettersson, J., Rogers, A., Matejkova, P., Smajs, D., et al. (2008) A novel Treponema pallidum antigen, TP0136, is an outer membrane protein that binds human fibronectin. Infect Immun 76: 18481857.
  • Bruckner, P. (2010) Suprastructures of extracellular matrices: paradigms of functions controlled by aggregates rather than molecules. Cell Tissue Res 339: 718.
  • Bumbaca, D., Littlejohn, J.E., Nayakanti, H., Rigden, D.J., Galperin, M.Y., and Jedrzejas, M.J. (2004) Sequence analysis and characterization of a novel fibronectin-binding repeat domain from the surface of Streptococcus pneumoniae. OMICS 8: 341356.
  • Christie, J., McNab, R., and Jenkinson, H.F. (2002) Expression of fibronectin-binding protein FbpA modulates adhesion in Streptococcus gordonii. Microbiology 148: 16151625.
  • Christner, M., Franke, G.C., Schommer, N.N., Wendt, U., Wegert, K., Pehle, P., et al. (2010) The giant extracellular matrix-binding protein of Staphylococcus epidermidis mediates biofilm accumulation and attachment to fibronectin. Mol Microbiol 75: 187207.
  • Deivanayagam, C.C., Rich, R.L., Carson, M., Owens, R.T., Danthuluri, S., Bice, T., et al. (2000) Novel fold and assembly of the repetitive B region of the Staphylococcus aureus collagen-binding surface protein. Structure 8: 6778.
  • Deivanayagam, C.C., Wann, E.R., Chen, W., Carson, M., Rajashankar, K.R., Hook, M., and Narayana, S.V. (2002) A novel variant of the immunoglobulin fold in surface adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus: crystal structure of the fibrinogen-binding MSCRAMM, clumping factor A. EMBO J 21: 66606672.
  • Desvaux, M. (2006) Unravelling carbon metabolism in anaerobic cellulolytic bacteria. Biotechnol Prog 22: 12291238.
  • Desvaux, M., Khan, A., Scott-Tucker, A., Chaudhuri, R.R., Pallen, M.J., and Henderson, I.R. (2005) Genomic analysis of the protein secretion systems in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. Biochim Biophys Acta 1745: 223253.
  • Desvaux, M., Dumas, E., Chafsey, I., and Hébraud, M. (2006) Protein cell surface display in Gram-positive bacteria: from single protein to macromolecular protein structure. FEMS Microbiol Lett 256: 115.
  • Desvaux, M., Hébraud, M., Talon, R., and Henderson, I.R. (2009) Secretion and subcellular localizations of bacterial proteins: a semantic awareness issue. Trends Microbiol 17: 139145.
  • Durbeej, M. (2010) Laminins. Cell Tissue Res 339: 259268.
  • Erat, M.C., Slatter, D.A., Lowe, E.D., Millard, C.J., Farndale, R.W., Campbell, I.D., and Vakonakis, I. (2009) Identification and structural analysis of type I collagen sites in complex with fibronectin fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 41954200.
  • Erdem, A.L., Avelino, F., Xicohtencatl-Cortes, J., and Giron, J.A. (2007) Host protein binding and adhesive properties of H6 and H7 flagella of attaching and effacing Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 189: 74267435.
  • Farfan, M.J., Inman, K.G., and Nataro, J.P. (2008) The major pilin subunit of the AAF/II fimbriae from enteroaggregative Escherichia coli mediates binding to extracellular matrix proteins. Infect Immun 76: 43784384.
  • Farfan, M.J., Cantero, L., Vidal, R., Botkin, D.J., and Torres, A.G. (2011) Long polar fimbriae of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 bind to extracellular matrix proteins. Infect Immun 79: 37443750.
  • Fox, A.J.S., Bedi, A., and Rodeo, S.A. (2009) The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health 1: 461468.
  • Geiger, B., and Yamada, K.M. (2011) Molecular architecture and function of matrix adhesions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3: a005033.
  • Gilot, P., and Content, J. (2002) Specific identification of Listeria welshimeri and Listeria monocytogenes by PCR assays targeting a gene encoding a fibronectin-binding protein. J Clin Microbiol 40: 698703.
  • Hayes, A.J., Lord, M.S., Smith, S.M., Smith, M.M., Whitelock, J.M., Weiss, A.S., and Melrose, J. (2011) Colocalization in vivo and association in vitro of perlecan and elastin. Histochem Cell Biol 136: 437454.
  • Heino, J., and Kapyla, J. (2009) Cellular receptors of extracellular matrix molecules. Curr Pharm Des 15: 13091317.
  • Heise, T., and Dersch, P. (2006) Identification of a domain in Yersinia virulence factor YadA that is crucial for extracellular matrix-specific cell adhesion and uptake. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 33753380.
  • Henderson, B., Nair, S., Pallas, J., and Williams, M.A. (2011) Fibronectin: a multidomain host adhesin targeted by bacterial fibronectin-binding proteins. FEMS Microbiol Rev 35: 147200.
  • Hilleringmann, M., Giusti, F., Baudner, B.C., Masignani, V., Covacci, A., Rappuoli, R., et al. (2008) Pneumococcal pili are composed of protofilaments exposing adhesive clusters of Rrg A. PLoS Pathog 4: e1000026.
  • Howard, J.C., Heinemann, C., Thatcher, B.J., Martin, B., Gan, B.S., and Reid, G. (2000) Identification of collagen-binding proteins in Lactobacillus spp. with surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization-time of flight ProteinChip technology. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 43964400.
  • Hurskainen, M., Ruggiero, F., Hagg, P., Pihlajaniemi, T., and Huhtala, P. (2010) Recombinant human collagen XV regulates cell adhesion and migration. J Biol Chem 285: 52585265.
  • Keane, F.M., Loughman, A., Valtulina, V., Brennan, M., Speziale, P., and Foster, T.J. (2007) Fibrinogen and elastin bind to the same region within the A domain of fibronectin binding protein A, an MSCRAMM of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 63: 711723.
  • King, N.P., Beatson, S.A., Totsika, M., Ulett, G.C., Alm, R.A., Manning, P.A., and Schembri, M.A. (2011) UafB is a serine-rich repeat adhesin of Staphylococcus saprophyticus that mediates binding to fibronectin, fibrinogen and human uroepithelial cells. Microbiology 157: 11611175.
  • Korotkova, N., Cota, E., Lebedin, Y., Monpouet, S., Guignot, J., Servin, A.L., et al. (2006) A subfamily of Dr adhesins of Escherichia coli bind independently to decay-accelerating factor and the N-domain of carcinoembryonic antigen. J Biol Chem 281: 2912029130.
  • Ledesma, M.A., Ochoa, S.A., Cruz, A., Rocha-Ramirez, L.M., Mas-Oliva, J., Eslava, C.A., et al. (2010) The hemorrhagic coli pilus (HCP) of Escherichia coli O157:H7 is an inducer of proinflammatory cytokine secretion in intestinal epithelial cells. PLoS ONE 5: 121127.
  • Leitinger, B. (2011) Transmembrane collagen receptors. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27: 265290.
  • Lin, Y.P., Lee, D.W., McDonough, S.P., Nicholson, L.K., Sharma, Y., and Chang, Y.F. (2009) Repeated domains of leptospira immunoglobulin-like proteins interact with elastin and tropoelastin. J Biol Chem 284: 1938019291.
  • Muiznieks, L.D., Weiss, A.S., and Keeley, F.W. (2010) Structural disorder and dynamics of elastin. Biochem Cell Biol 88: 239250.
  • Murakami, Y., Iwahashi, H., Yasuda, H., Umemoto, T., Namikawa, I., Kitano, S., and Hanazawa, S. (1996) Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbrillin is one of the fibronectin-binding proteins. Infect Immun 64: 25712576.
  • Nallapareddy, S.R., Weinstock, G.M., and Murray, B.E. (2003) Clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium exhibit strain-specific collagen binding mediated by Acm, a new member of the MSCRAMM family. Mol Microbiol 47: 17331747.
  • Nallapareddy, S.R., Singh, K.V., Sillanpaa, J., Zhao, M., and Murray, B.E. (2011) Relative contributions of Ebp Pili and the collagen adhesin ace to host extracellular matrix protein adherence and experimental urinary tract infection by Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. Infect Immun 79: 29012910.
  • Nitsche, D.P., Johansson, H.M., Frick, I.M., and Morgelin, M. (2006) Streptococcal protein FOG, a novel matrix adhesin interacting with collagen I in vivo. J Biol Chem 281: 16701679.
  • Orend, G., Huang, W., Olayioye, M.A., Hynes, N.E., and Chiquet-Ehrismann, R. (2003) Tenascin-C blocks cell-cycle progression of anchorage-dependent fibroblasts on fibronectin through inhibition of syndecan-4. Oncogene 22: 39173926.
  • Orgel, J.P., Antipova, O., Sagi, I., Bitler, A., Qiu, D., Wang, R., et al. (2011) Collagen fibril surface displays a constellation of sites capable of promoting fibril assembly, stability, and hemostasis. Connect Tissue Res 52: 1824.
  • Pankov, R., and Yamada, K.M. (2002) Fibronectin at a glance. J Cell Sci 115: 38613863.
  • Park, P.W., Broekelmann, T.J., Mecham, B.R., and Mecham, R.P. (1999) Characterization of the elastin binding domain in the cell-surface 25-kDa elastin-binding protein of staphylococcus aureus (EbpS). J Biol Chem 274: 28452850.
  • Patti, J.M., Allen, B.L., McGavin, M.J., and Hook, M. (1994) MSCRAMM-mediated adherence of microorganisms to host tissues. Annu Rev Microbiol 48: 585617.
  • Pietrocola, G., Valtulina, V., Rindi, S., Jost, B.H., and Speziale, P. (2007) Functional and structural properties of CbpA, a collagen-binding protein from Arcanobacterium pyogenes. Microbiology 153: 33803389.
  • Pinne, M., Choy, H.A., and Haake, D.A. (2010) The OmpL37 surface-exposed protein is expressed by pathogenic Leptospira during infection and binds skin and vascular elastin. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e815.
  • Ponnuraj, K., Bowden, M.G., Davis, S., Gurusiddappa, S., Moore, D., Choe, D., et al. (2003) A ‘dock, lock, and latch’ structural model for a staphylococcal adhesin binding to fibrinogen. Cell 115: 217228.
  • Reissmann, S., Gillen, C.M., Fulde, M., Bergmann, R., Nerlich, A., Rajkumari, R., et al. (2012) Region specific and worldwide distribution of collagen-binding M proteins with PARF motifs among human pathogenic streptococcal isolates. PLoS ONE 7: e30122.
  • Ricard-Blum, S. (2011) The collagen family. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3: a004978.
  • Schaefer, L., and Schaefer, R.M. (2010) Proteoglycans: from structural compounds to signaling molecules. Cell Tissue Res 339: 237246.
  • Schultz, G.S., and Wysocki, A. (2009) Interactions between extracellular matrix and growth factors in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 17: 153162.
  • Shimoji, Y., Ogawa, Y., Osaki, M., Kabeya, H., Maruyama, S., Mikami, T., and Sekizaki, T. (2003) Adhesive surface proteins of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae bind to polystyrene, fibronectin, and type I and IV collagens. J Bacteriol 185: 27392748.
  • Sokurenko, E.V., Courtney, H.S., Ohman, D.E., Klemm, P., and Hasty, D.L. (1994) FimH family of type 1 fimbrial adhesins: functional heterogeneity due to minor sequence variations among fimH genes. J Bacteriol 176: 748755.
  • Sutcliffe, I.C. (2010) A phylum level perspective on bacterial cell envelope architecture. Trends Microbiol 18: 464470.
  • Tahir, Y.E., Kuusela, P., and Skurnik, M. (2000) Functional mapping of the Yersinia enterocolitica adhesin YadA. Identification of eight NSVAIG – S motifs in the amino-terminal half of the protein involved in collagen binding. Mol Microbiol 37: 192206.
  • Vakonakis, I., and Campbell, I.D. (2007) Extracellular matrix: from atomic resolution to ultrastructure. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19: 578583.
  • de Vega, S., Iwamoto, T., and Yamada, Y. (2009) Fibulins: multiple roles in matrix structures and tissue functions. Cell Mol Life Sci 66: 18901902.
  • Vieira, M.L., de Morais, Z.M., Goncales, A.P., Romero, E.C., Vasconcellos, S.A., and Nascimento, A.L. (2010) Lsa63, a newly identified surface protein of Leptospira interrogans binds laminin and collagen IV. J Infect 60: 5264.
  • Wells, T.J., McNeilly, T.N., Totsika, M., Mahajan, A., Gally, D.L., and Schembri, M.A. (2009) The Escherichia coli O157:H7 EhaB autotransporter protein binds to laminin and collagen I and induces a serum IgA response in O157:H7 challenged cattle. Environ Microbiol 11: 18031814.
  • Westerlund, B., van Die, I., Kramer, C., Kuusela, P., Holthofer, H., Tarkkanen, A.M., et al. (1991) Multifunctional nature of P fimbriae of uropathogenic Escherichia coli: mutations in fsoE and fsoF influence fimbrial binding to renal tubuli and immobilized fibronectin. Mol Microbiol 5: 29652975.
  • van Wieringen, T., Kalamajski, S., Liden, A., Bihan, D., Guss, B., Heinegard, D., et al. (2010) The streptococcal collagen-binding protein CNE specifically interferes with alphaVbeta3-mediated cellular interactions with triple helical collagen. J Biol Chem 285: 3580335813.
  • Yurchenco, P.D. (2011) Basement membranes: cell scaffoldings and signaling platforms. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3: a004911.
  • Zogaj, X., Bokranz, W., Nimtz, M., and Romling, U. (2003) Production of cellulose and curli fimbriae by members of the family Enterobacteriaceae isolated from the human gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun 71: 41514158.
  • Zong, Y., Xu, Y., Liang, X., Keene, D.R., Hook, A., Gurusiddappa, S., et al. (2005) A ‘Collagen Hug’ model for Staphylococcus aureus CNA binding to collagen. EMBO J 24: 42244236.