The efficacy of 12 weeks supervised exercise in obesity management

Authors

  • L. Y. Herring,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
    2. School of Sport Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
    • Address for correspondence: Miss L Herring, Physical Activity and Public Health Research Group, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Sir Jon Beckwith Building, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK. E-mail: l.herring@lboro.ac.uk

    Search for more papers by this author
  • C. Wagstaff,

    1. Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
    Search for more papers by this author
  • A. Scott

    1. Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

Summary

The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the effect of adding either aerobic training (AT) or resistance training (RT) to a multidisciplinary teamed (MDT) educational weight management programme on the health-related fitness of morbidly obese individuals. Males (n = 9) and females (n = 24) aged between 24 and 68 years with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥40 kg m2 (≥35 kg m2 with comorbidities) undertaking a weight management programme were recruited (Completion: M = 8, F = 19). Participants were randomly allocated to either AT (n = 12), RT (n = 11) or CON (n = 10). AT and RT undertook three structured ∼60 min moderate intensity sessions weekly, two supervised gym-based and one structured home-based session for 12 weeks; CON undertook usual care alone. Anthropometric, psychological and functional capacity measures were obtained pre- and post-intervention. Both exercise interventions elicited improvements compared with CON in the: shuttle walk test (AT [Δ 207.0 ± 123.0 metres, 68.0%, P = 0.04], RT [Δ 165.0 ± 183.3 m, 48.8%, P = 0.06], CON [Δ −14.3 ± 38.7 m, −6.2%]), triceps skin-fold (P ≤ 0.001), self-efficacy (P = 0.005) and interest/enjoyment (P = 0.006). RT displayed additional improvements compared with CON in BMI (RT [Δ −1.02 ± 0.91 kg·m2, −2.5%, P = 0.033], AT [Δ −1.84 ± 2.70 kg·m2, −4.3%, P = 0.142], CON [Δ −0.31 ± 1.47 kg·m2, −0.6%]), waist circumference (P = 0.022), competence (P = 0.019), biceps skin-fold (P = 0.012) and medial calf skin-fold (P = 0.013). No significant differences were observed between exercise modalities. Regardless of exercise mode, the addition of supervised and structured exercise to a MDT weight management programme significantly improved anthropometric, functional and psychological measures in obese participants with a BMI of ≥35 kg·m2.

Ancillary