Effects of Errors and Gaps in Spatial Data Sets on Assessment of Conservation Progress
Version of Record online: 21 JUL 2013
© 2013 Society for Conservation Biology
Volume 27, Issue 5, pages 1000–1010, October 2013
How to Cite
VISCONTI, P., DI MARCO, M., ÁLVAREZ-ROMERO, J. G., JANUCHOWSKI-HARTLEY, S. R., PRESSEY, R. L., WEEKS, R. and RONDININI, C. (2013), Effects of Errors and Gaps in Spatial Data Sets on Assessment of Conservation Progress. Conservation Biology, 27: 1000–1010. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12095
- Issue online: 19 SEP 2013
- Version of Record online: 21 JUL 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 2 MAR 2013
- Manuscript Received: 28 JUN 2012
- Mexico's Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT)
- Secretaría de Educación Pública (SEP)
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
Disclaimer: Supplementary materials have been peer-reviewed but not copyedited.
|cobi12095-sup-0001-supmat.doc||85K||Percentage of species surpassing a 20% error in estimated extent of protection for increasing percentage of protected area within buffered centroids (Appendix S1), results of sensitivity analyses of threshold error in estimated extent of protection (Appendix S2), percentage of species surpassing 20% in either commission or omission error for increasing percentage of protected area within buffered centroids (Appendix S3), additional discussion on the effects of buffered centroids (Appendix S4), and information on habitat loss, ecosystem dynamics, and gap analyses (Appendix S5) are available online. The authors are solely responsible for the content and functionality of these materials. Queries (other than absence of the material) should be directed to the corresponding author.|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.