SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature Cited

  • Adams, W. M. 2007. Editorial: Thinking like a human: social science and the two cultures problem. Oryx 41:275276.
  • Balsamo, A., and C. Mitcham. 2010. Interdisciplinarity in ethics and the ethics of interdisciplinarity. Pages 259272 in J. T. Klein, editor. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Broto, V. C., M. Gislason, and M. Ehlers. 2009. Practising interdisciplinarity in the interplay between disciplines: experiences of established researchers. Environmental Science & Policy 12:922933.
  • Büscher, B. 2013. Transforming the frontier: peace parks and the politics of neoliberal conservation in southern Africa. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Campbell, L. M. 2005. Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary research. Conservation Biology 19:574577.
  • Chan, K. M. A., R. M. Pringle, J. Ranganathan, et al. 2007. When agendas collide: human welfare and biological conservation. Conservation Biology 21:5968.
  • Collins, S. L., S. R. Carpenter, S. M. Swinton, et al. 2011. An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social–ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9:351357.
  • Cowling, R. M., B. Egoh, A. T. Knight, et al. 2008. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:94839488.
  • Cronon, W., editor. 1995. Uncommon ground: toward reinventing nature. W.W. Norton, New York.
  • Daily, G. C., and P. R. Ehrlich. 1999. Managing earth's ecosystems: an interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems 2:277280.
  • Dewulf, A., G. François, C. Pahl-Wostl, and T. Taillieu. 2007. A framing approach to cross-disciplinary research collaboration: experiences from a large-scale research project on adaptive water management. Ecology and Society 12:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art14/
  • di Castri, F. 1976. International, interdisciplinary research in ecology: some problems of organization and execution: the case of the man and the biosphere (MAB) programme. Human Ecology 4:235246.
  • di Castri, F., M. Hadley, and J. Damlamian. 1981. MAB: the man and the biosphere program as an evolving system. Ambio 10:5257.
  • di Castri, F., and M. Hadley. 1986. Enhancing the credibility of ecology: Is interdisciplinary research for land use planning useful? GeoJournal 13:299325.
  • Drew, J. A., and A. P. Henne. 2006. Conservation biology and traditional ecological knowledge: integrating academic disciplines for better conservation practice. Ecology and Society 11:3442.
  • Duraiappah, A. K., and D. S. Rogers. 2011. Survey of social science scholars on engagement in global environmental change research. International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change. Available from http://www.ihdp.unu.edu/file/get/9091
  • Endter-Wada, J., D. Blahna, R. Krannich, and M. Brunson. 1998. A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 8:891904.
  • Evely, A. C., I. Fazey, X. Lambin, E. Lambert, S. Allen, and M. Pinard. 2010. Defining and evaluating the impact of cross-disciplinary conservation research. Environmental Conservation 37:442450.
  • Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., H. P. Huntington, and K. J. Frost. 2007. Integration or co-optation? Traditional knowledge and science in the Alaska Beluga Whale Committee. Environmental Conservation 33:306315.
  • Fischer, J., A. D. Manning, W. Steffen, D. B. Rose, K. Daniell, A. Felton, and S. Garnett. 2007. Mind the sustainability gap. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22:621624.
  • Folke, C. 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social – ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16:253267.
  • Fox, H. E., C. Christian, J. C. Nordby, O. R. W. D. Pergams, G. D. Peterson, and C. R. Pyke. 2006. Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation. Conservation Biology 20:18171820.
  • Gibson, C. C., E. Ostrom, and T. K. Ahn. 2000. The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecological Economics 32:217239.
  • Guha, R. 1997. The authoritarian biologist and the arrogance of anti-humanism: wildlife conservation in the Third World. The Ecologist 27:1420.
  • Hadorn, C. H., C. Pohl, and B. Gabriele. 2010. Solving problems through transdisciplinary research. Pages 431452 in J. T. Klein et al., editors. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Head, L., D. Trigger, and J. Mulcock. 2005. Culture as concept and influence in environmental research and management. Conservation and Society 3:251264.
  • Heberlein, T. A. 1988. Improving interdisciplinary research: integrating the social and natural sciences. Society and Natural Resources 1:516.
  • Heemskerk, M., K. Wilson, and M. Pavao-Zuckerman. 2003. Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines. Conservation Ecology 7:http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art8
  • Hicks, C. C., C. Fitzsimmons, and N. V. C. Polunin. 2010. Interdisciplinarity in the environmental sciences: barriers and frontiers. Environmental Conservation 37:464477.
  • Huutoniemi, K. 2010. Evaluating interdisciplinary research. Pages 309320 in J. T. Klein, et al., editors. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Jepson, P., and S. Canney. 2003. Values-led conservation. Global Ecology & Biogeography 12:271274.
  • Jones, N. A., H. Ross, T. Lynam, P. Perez, and A. Leitch. 2011. Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society 16:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/
  • Khagram, S., K. A. Nicholas, D. M. Bever, J. Warren, E. H. Richards, K. Oleson, and J. Kitzes. 2010. Thinking about knowing: conceptual foundations for interdisciplinary environmental research. Environmental Conservation 3:388397.
  • Klein, J. T. 2010. A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. Pages 1530 in J. T. Klein, et al., editors. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • Lane, S. N., N. Odoni, C. Landström, S. J. Whatmore, N. Ward, and S. Bradley. 2011. Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36:1536.
  • Leemans, R., G. Asrar, A. Busalacchi, et al. 2009. Developing a common strategy for integrative global environmental change research and outreach: the Earth System Science Partnership (ESSP). Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 1:413.
  • Lélé, S., and R. B. Norgaard. 2005. Practicing interdisciplinarity. BioScience 55:967975.
  • Lowe, P., G. Whitman, and J. Phillipson. 2009. Ecology and the social sciences. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:297305.
  • Ludwig, D., M. Mangel, and B. Haddad. 2001. Ecology, conservation, and public policy. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 32:481517.
  • MacMynowski, D. P. 2007. Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science. Ecology and Society 12:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art20/
  • Mascia, M. B., J. P. Brosius, T. A. Dobson, et al. 2003. Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology 17:649650.
  • Meffe, G. K., D. Ehrenfeld, and R. F. Noss. 2006. Conservation biology at twenty. Conservation Biology 20:595596.
  • Miller, B. W., S. C. Caplow, and P. W. Leslie. 2012. Feedbacks between conservation and social-ecological systems. Conservation Biology 26:218227.
  • Milner-Gulland, E. J. 2012. Interactions between human behavior and ecological systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367:270278.
  • Minteer, B., and J. P. Collins. 2005. Ecological ethics: building a new tool kit for ecologists and biodiversity managers. Conservation Biology 19:18031812.
  • Moran, E. F. 2010. Environmental social science: human–environment interactions and sustainability. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
  • Nelson, M. P., and J. A. Vucetich. 2009. On advocacy by environmental scientists: what, whether, why, and how. Conservation Biology 23:10901101.
  • Newell, B., C. L. Crumley, N. Hassan, et al. 2005. A conceptual template for integrative human–environment research. Global Environmental Change 5:299307.
  • Newing, H. 2010. Interdisciplinary training in environmental conservation: definitions, progress and future directions. Environmental Conservation 37:410418.
  • Nicolson, C. R., A. M. Starfield, G. P. Kofinas, and J. A. Kruse. 2002. Ten heuristics for interdisciplinary modeling projects. Ecosystems 5:376384.
  • Noss, R. F. 1999. Is there a special conservation biology? Ecography 22:113122.
  • Phillipson, J., P. Lowe, and A. Liddon. 2011. Adventures in science: interdisciplinarity and knowledge exchange in the Relu Programme. Newcastle Upon Tyne, Relu: Available from www.relu.ac.uk
  • Pickett, S. T. A. 1999. Interdisciplinary research: maintaining the constructive impulse in a culture of criticism. Ecosystems 2:302307.
  • Pojman, L. P. 2011. Environmental ethics: readings in theory and application. 6th edition. Wadsworth, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Pooley, S. 2013. Historians are from Venus, ecologists are from Mars. Conservation Biology. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12106.
  • Pretty, J., B. Adams, F. Berkes, et al. 2009. The intersections of biological diversity and cultural diversity: towards integration. Conservation and Society 7:100112.
  • Ressurreição, A., J. Gibbons, M. Kaiser, et al. 2012. Different cultures, different values: the role of cultural variation in the public's WTP for marine species conservation. Biological Conservation 145:148159.
  • Reyers, B., D. J. Roux, and P. J. O'Farrell. 2010. Can ecosystem services lead ecology on a transdisciplinary pathway? Environmental Conservation 37:501511.
  • Robin, L., and W. Steffen. 2007. History for the Anthropocene. History Compass 5:16941719.
  • Ruitenbeek, H. J. 1997. Through privilege and precaution: rediscovering the conservation ethic. Environment and Development Economics 2:39110.
  • Sandbrook, C., W. Adams, B. Büscher, and V. Bhaskar. 2013. Social research and biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12141.
  • Saunders, C. D., A. T. Brook, and O. E. Myers. 2006. Using psychology to save biodiversity and human well-being. Conservation Biology 20:702705.
  • Schlüter, M., R. R. J. McAllister, N. Bunnefeld, et al. 2012. New horizons for managing the environment: a review of coupled social-ecological systems modelling. Natural Resource Modeling 25:219272.
  • Scoones, I. 1999. New ecology and the social sciences: What prospects for a fruitful engagement? Annual Review of Anthropology 28:479507.
  • Sessions, G., editor. 1995. Deep ecology for the twenty-first century. Shambhala Publications, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Shakeroff, J. M., and L. M. Campbell. 2007. Traditional ecological knowledge in conservation research: problems and prospects for their constructive engagement. Conservation and Society 5:343360.
  • Sievanen, L., L. M. Campbell, and H. M. Leslie. 2012. Challenges to interdisciplinary research in ecosystem-based management. Conservation Biology 26:315323.
  • Soulé, M. 1985. What is conservation biology? A new synthetic discipline addresses the dynamics and problems of perturbed and ecosystems. BioScience 35:727734.
  • St John, F. A. V., G. Edwards-Jones, and J. P. G. Jones. 2010. Conservation and human behavior: lessons from social psychology. Wildlife Research 37:658667.
  • Stafford-Smith, M., O. Gaffney, L. Brito, E. Ostrom, and S. Seitzinger. 2012. Interconnected risks and solutions for a planet under pressure – overview and introduction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4:36.
  • Strang, V. 2009. Integrating the social and natural sciences in environmental research: a discussion paper. Environment, Development and Sustainability 11:118.
  • Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research. 2nd edition. Sage Publications, London.
  • Szabó, P. 2010. Why history matters in ecology: an interdisciplinary perspective. Environmental Conservation 37:380387.
  • Torkar, G., and S. L. T. McGregor. 2012. Reframing the conception of nature conservation management by transdisciplinary methodology: from stakeholders to stakesharers. Journal for Nature Conservation 20:6571.
  • Tress, B., G. Tress, and G. Fry. 2006. Defining concepts and processes of knowledge production in integrative research. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  • United Nations Education, Science and Culture Organisation. 1971. International Co-ordinating Council of the Programme on Man and the Biosphere (MAB). MAB Report Series 1. Paris, UNESCO.
  • Wear, D. N. 1999. Challenges to interdisciplinary discourse. Ecosystems 2:299301.
  • Welch-Devine, M., and L. M. Campbell. 2010. Sorting out roles and defining divides: social sciences at the World Conservation Congress. Conservation and Society 8:339348.
  • West, P., J. Igoe, and D. Brockington. 2006. Parks and People: the social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology 35:251277.
  • Whyte, A. 1982. The integration of natural and social sciences in the MAB Programme. International Social Science Journal 93:411426.
  • Wilhere, G. F. 2011. Inadvertent advocacy. Conservation Biology 26:3946.
  • Worster, D. 1996. The two cultures revisited: environmental history and the environmental sciences. Environment and History 2:314.
  • Zube, E. 1982. Increasing the effective participation of social scientists in environmental research and planning. International Social Science Journal 93:481492.