SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature Cited

  • Adamowicz, W., P. Boxall, M. Williams, and J. Louviere. 1998. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:6475.
  • Adamowicz, W., J. Swait, P. Boxall, J. Louviere, and M. Williams. 1997. Perceptions versus objective measures of environmental quality in combined revealed and stated preference models of environmental valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32:6584.
  • Aldred, J. 2006. Incommensurability and monetary valuation. Land Economics 82:141161.
  • Altman, I., and S. M. Low. 1992. Place attachment: human behavior and environment. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Bateman, I. J., et al. 2002. Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar, Northampton, Massachusetts.
  • Berman, M. G., J. Jonides, and S. Kaplan. 2008. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science 19:12071212.
    Direct Link:
  • Blanchflower, D. G., and A. J. Oswald. 2004. Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics 88:13591386.
  • Bowler, D. E., L. M. Buyung-Ali, T. M. Knight, and A. S. Pullin. 2010. A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 10:456.
  • Cardoso, P., T. L. Erwin, P. A. V. Borges, and T. R. New. 2011. The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biological Conservation 144:26472655.
  • CEC. 2009. GDP and beyond. European Commission, Brussels.
  • Christie, M., N. Hanley, J. Warren, K. Murphy, R. Wright, and T. Hyde. 2006. Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecological Economics 58:304317.
  • Clark, J., and L. Friesen. 2008. The causes of order effects in contingent valuation surveys: An experimental investigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56:195206.
  • CMEPSP. 2009. Report of the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. CMEPSP, Paris.
  • Dallimer, M., K. N. Irvine, A. M. J. Skinner, Z. G. Davies, J. R. Rouquette, L. L. Maltby, P. H. Warren, P. R. Armsworth, and K. J. Gaston. 2012. Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience 62:4755.
  • Engel, G. L. 1977. The need for a new medical model – a challenge for biomedicine. Science 196:129136.
  • Fuller, R. A., K. N. Irvine, P. Devine-Wright, P. H. Warren, and K. J. Gaston. 2007. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters 3:390394.
  • García-Llorente, M., B. Martín-López, S. Díaz, and C. Montes. 2011. Can ecosystem properties be fully translated into service values? An economic valuation of aquatic plant services. Ecological Applications 21:30833103.
  • Hanley, N., and E. Barbier. 2009. Pricing nature: cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
  • Hanley, N., R. E. Wright, and B. Alvarez-Farizo. 2006. Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive. Journal of Environmental Management 78:183.
  • Herzog, T. R., E. J. Herbert, R. Kaplan, and C. L. Crooks. 2000. Cultural and developmental comparisons of landscape perceptions and preferences. Environment and Behavior 32:323346.
  • Jacobsen, J. B., and N. Hanley. 2009. Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation? Environmental and Resource Economics 43:137160.
  • Kahneman, D., and R. Sugden. 2005. Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics 32:161181.
  • Kaplan, R., and S. Kaplan. 1989. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Kenwick, R. A., R. Shammin, and W. C. Sullivan. 2009. Preferences for riparian buffers. Landscape and Urban Planning 91:8896.
  • Kumar, P. 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. Earthscan, London and Washington.
  • Kuo, F. E. 2001. Coping with poverty – impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior 33:534.
  • Lancaster, K. J. 1966. New approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 74:132157.
  • Liu, S., R. Costanza, S. Farber, and A. Troy. 2010. Valuing ecosystem services. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1185:5478.
  • Martin-Lopez, B., C. Montes, and J. Benayas. 2008. Economic valuation of biodiversity conservation: the meaning of numbers. Conservation Biology 22:624635.
  • MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
  • Naidoo, R., A. Balmford, R. Costanza, B. Fisher, R. E. Green, B. Lehner, T. R. Malcolm, and T. H. Ricketts. 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:94959500.
  • Nunes, P. A. L. D., and J. C. J. M. van den Bergh. 2001. Economic valuation of biodiversity: Sense or nonsense? Ecological Economics 39:203222.
  • ONS. 2012a. Families and households 2001 to 2011. Office for National Statistics, London.
  • ONS. 2012b. Initial findings from the consultation on proposed domains and measures of national well-being. Office for National Statistics, London.
  • Özgüner, H., and A. D. Kendle. 2006. Public attitudes towards naturalistic versus designed landscapes in the city of Sheffield (UK). Landscape And Urban Planning 74:139157.
  • Proshansky, H. M., A. K. Fabian, and R. Kaminoff. 1983. Place-identity: physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology 3:5783.
  • Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets – product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 82:3455.
  • Sachs, J. D., et al. 2009. Biodiversity conservation and the millennium development goals. Science 325:15021503.
  • Spangenberg, J. H., and J. Settele. 2010. Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity 7:327337.
  • Spash, C. L., and A. Vatn. 2006. Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecological Economics 60:379388.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell. 2001. Using multivariate statistics. Harper Collins, London.
  • UKNEA. 2011. The UK national ecosystem assessment: technical report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • United States Environment Protection Agency. 2009. Valuing the protection of ecological systems and services. A Report of the EPA Science Advisory Board. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
  • Walker, B., L. Pearson, M. Harris, K.-G. Maler, C.-Z. Li, R. Biggs, and T. Baynes. 2008. Incorporating resilience in the assessment of inclusive wealth: an example from South East Australia. Discussion Paper 209. Beijer Institute. Available from www.beijer.kva.se.
  • Ward-Thompson, C., J. Roe, P. Aspinall, R. Mitchell, A. Clow, and D. Miller. 2012. More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landscape And Urban Planning 105:221229.
  • Whiteman, G., M. Dorsey, and B. Wittneben. 2010. Businesses and biodiversity: they would say that. Nature 466:435.
  • Zendehdel, K., M. Rademaker, B. De Baets, and G. Van Huylenbroeck. 2008. Qualitative valuation of environmental criteria through a group consensus based on stochastic dominance. Ecological Economics 67:253264.