Literature Cited

  • Adams, W. M., and D. Hulme. 2001. If community conservation is the answer in Africa, what is the question? ORYX 35:193200.
  • Benson, M. H. 2012. Intelligent tinkering: the Endangered Species Act and resilience. Ecology and Society 17(4):
  • Berkes, F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18:621630.
  • Berkes, F. 2007. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:1518815193.
  • Brandon A. P., and A. Szabo. 2011. Protected areas: conservation cornerstones or paradoxes? Insights from human-wildlife conflicts in Africa and southeastern Europe. Pages 255282 in J. La Pez-Pujol, editor. The importance of biological interactions in the study of biodiversity. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia.
  • Chape, S., J. Harrison, M. Spalding, and I. Lysenko. 2005. Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences 360:443455.
  • Clark, J. A. 1995. The Endangered Species Act: its history, provisions, and effectiveness. Pages 1943 in T. W. Clark, R.P. Reading, and A. L. Clarke, editors. Endangered species recovery: finding the lessons, improving the process. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
  • Cronon, W. 1995. The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. Pages 6990 in W. Cronon, editor. Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. W. W. Norton, New York.
  • Ervin, J., K. J. Mulongoy, K. Lawrence, E. Game, D. Sheppard, P. Bridgewater, G. Bennett, S. B. Gidda, and P. Bos. 2010. Making protected areas relevant: a guide to integrating protected areas into wider landscapes, seascapes and sectoral plans and strategies. Technical series 44. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada.
  • Hastings, D. 2011. Excessive Endangered Species Act litigation threatens species recovery, job creation and economic growth. Press release. Available from (accessed November 2013).
  • Holling, C. S. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390405.
  • Fischer, J., et al. 2008. Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6:380385.
  • Lee, K. N. 2001. Sustainability, concept and practice of encyclopedia of biodiversity, Volume 5. Academic Press, Waltham, Massachusetts.
  • Miller, J. R., and R. J. Hobbs. 2002. Conservation where people live and work. Conservation Biology 16:330337.
  • Murphree, M. W. 2002. Protected areas and the commons. Common Property Resource Digest 60:13.
  • Olive, A., and A. Minichiello. 2013. Wild things in urban spaces: America's largest cities and multi-scales of governance for endangered species conservation. Applied Geography 43:5666.
  • Polasky, S., E., Nelson, Lonsdorf, P. Fackler, and A. Starfield. 2005. Conserving species in a working landscape: land use with biological and economic objectives. Ecological Applications 15:13871401.
  • Redford, K. H., J.G. Robinson, and W.M. Adams. 2006. Parks as shibboleths. Conservation Biology 2:12.
  • Rohlf, D. J. 2005. Six biological reasons why the Endangered Species Act doesn't work—and what to do about it. Conservation Biology 5:273282.
  • Sax, J. L. 1993. Nature and habitat conservation and protection in the United States. Ecology Law Quarterly 20:4756.
  • Suckling, K., N. Greenwall, and T. Curry. 2012. On time, on target: how the Endangered Species Act is saving America's wildlife. Center for Biological Diversity, Tucson, Arizona.
  • Taylor, M .F. J., K. F. Suckling, and J. J. Rachlinski. 2005. The effectiveness of the endangered species act: a quantitative analysis. BioScience 55:360367.
  • U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 2013. ESA basics: 40 years of conserving endangered species. Available from (accessed November 2013).
  • Wilshusen, P. R., S. R. Brechin, C. L. Fortwangler, and P. C. West. 2002. Reinventing the square wheel: critique of a resurgent “protection paradigm” in international biodiversity conservation. Society and Natural Resources 15:1740.