Integrating Biological and Social Values When Prioritizing Places for Biodiversity Conservation
Version of Record online: 11 MAR 2014
© 2014 Society for Conservation Biology
Volume 28, Issue 4, pages 992–1003, August 2014
How to Cite
WHITEHEAD, A. L., KUJALA, H., IVES, C. D., GORDON, A., LENTINI, P. E., WINTLE, B. A., NICHOLSON, E. and RAYMOND, C. M. (2014), Integrating Biological and Social Values When Prioritizing Places for Biodiversity Conservation. Conservation Biology, 28: 992–1003. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12257
- Issue online: 22 JUL 2014
- Version of Record online: 11 MAR 2014
- Manuscript Accepted: 24 OCT 2013
- Manuscript Received: 18 JUL 2013
- Environmental Decisions Research Hub and the Landscapes and Policy Research Hub
- Australian Government's National Environmental Research Program (NERP)
- ARC Future Fellowship. Grant Number: FT100100819
Disclaimer: Supplementary materials have been peer-reviewed but not copyedited.
|cobi12257-sup-0001-SuppMat.pdf||502K||A table of environmental variables used in the MaxEnt models (Appendix S1), results of the MaxEnt models for each species (Appendix S2), operational definitions of the social values and development preferences used in the PPGIS study (Appendix S3), description of 3 additional prioritization scenarios analyzed (Appendix S4), plot showing proportion of overlapping cells in pairwise comparisons of Zonation solutions at different landscape thresholds (Appendix S5), spatial prioritizations for 3 additional scenarios (Appendix S6), and replacement cost curves for 3 additional scenarios (Appendix S7) are available on-line. The authors are solely responsible for the content and functionality of these materials. Queries (other than absence of the material) should be directed to the corresponding author.|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.