Literature Cited

  • Ackerman, F., and E. Stanton. 2012. Climate risks and carbon prices: revising the social cost of carbon. Economics 6. Available from:
  • Braunisch, V., R. Home, J. Pellet, and R. Arlettaz. 2012. Conservation science relevant to action: A research agenda identified and prioritized by practitioners. Biological Conservation 153:201210.
  • Brunt, L., J. Lerner, and T. Nicholas. 2012. Inducement prizes and innovation. The Journal of Industrial Economics 60:657696.
  • Card, D., and S. DellaVigna. 2013. Nine facts about top journals in economics. Journal of Economic Literature 51:144161.
  • Colón-Rivera, R. J., K. Marshall, F. J. Soto-Santiago, D. Ortiz-Torres, and C. E. Flower. 2013. Moving forward: fostering the next generation of Earth stewards in the STEM disciplines. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:383391.
  • Cummings, J. N., and S. Kiesler. 2007. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy 36:16201634.
  • Dietz, S. 2012. The treatment of risk and uncertainty in the US social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis. Economics 6 DOI:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-18.
  • Fleishman, E., D. E. Blockstein, J. A. Hall, M. B. Mascia, M. A. Rudd, J. M. Scott, W. J. Sutherland, A. M. Bartuska, A. G. Brown, and C. A. Christen. 2011. Top 40 priorities for science to inform US conservation and management policy. BioScience 61:290300.
  • Greenstone, M., E. Kopits, and A. Wolverton. 2013. Developing a social cost of carbon for US regulatory analysis: a methodology and interpretation. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 7:2346.
  • Hampton, S. E., and J. N. Parker. 2011. Collaboration and productivity in scientific synthesis. BioScience 61:900910.
  • Hoffer, T., and V. Welch Jr. 2006. Time to degree of U.S. research doctorate recipients. Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences InfoBrief. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
  • Kopp, R., and B. Mignone. 2012. The US government's social cost of carbon estimates after their first two years: pathways for improvement. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 6 DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-15.
  • Murray, F., S. Stern, G. Campbell, and A. MacCormack. 2012. Grand innovation prizes: a theoretical, normative, and empirical evaluation. Research Policy 41:17791792.
  • Novy-Hildesley, J. 2010. By the grace of invention: how individuals power development. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 5:724.
  • Pe'er, G., J. A. McNeely, M. Dieterich, B. G. Jonsson, N. Selva, J. M. Fitzgerald, and C. Nesshover. 2013. IPBES: opportunities and challenges for SCB and other learned societies. Conservation Biology 27:13.
  • Pycroft, J., L. Vergano, C. Hope, D. Paci, and J. Ciscar. 2011. A tale of tails: uncertainty and the social cost of carbon dioxide. Economics 5 DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2011-22.
  • Sutherland, W. J., et al. 2009. One hundred questions of importance to the conservation of global biological diversity. Conservation Biology 23:557567.
  • Uriarte, M., H. A. Ewing, V. T. Eviner, and K. C. Weathers. 2007. Constructing a broader and more inclusive value system in science. BioScience 57:7178.
  • U.S. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon. 2013. Page 22 in Technical support document: technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis—under Executive Order 12866. U.S. Government, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC.
  • Young, J. C., A. D. Watt, S. van den Hove, and the SPIRAL project team. 2013. The SPIRAL synthesis report: a resource book on science-policy interfaces. Available from (accessed January 2014).