SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, S., Matlock, T., Fausey, C., & Spivey, M. (2008). On the path to understanding on-line processing of grammatical aspect. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, V. M. Sloutsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 143148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Anderson, S. E., Matlock, T., & Spivey, M. J. (2010). On-line interactions of context and grammatical aspect. In S. Ohlsson, R. Catrambone (Ed.), Proceedings of the 32th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 11981203). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 114.
  • Athanasopoulos, P. (2007). Interaction between grammatical categories and cognition in bilinguals: The role of proficiency, cultural immersion, and language of instruction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 689699.
  • Athanasopoulos, P., Dering, B., Wiggett, A., Kuipers, J., & Thierry, G. (2010). Perceptual shift in bilingualism: Brain potentials reveal plasticity in pre-attentive colour perception. Cognition, 116, 437443.
  • Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829839.
  • Binnick, R. (1991). Time and the verb: A guide to tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bylund, E. (2008). Procesos de conceptualización de eventos en español y en sueco: Diferencias transglingüísticas. Revue Romane, 43, 124.
  • Bylund, E. (2009). Effects of age of L2 acquisition on L1 event conceptualization patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 305322.
  • Bylund, E., & Jarvis, S. (2011). L2 effects on L1 event conceptualization. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 4759.
  • Carroll, M., & von Stutterheim, C. (2006). The impact of grammaticalized temporal categories on ultimate attainment in advanced L2 acquisition. In H. Byrnes, H. Weger-Guntharp, & K. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities (pp. 4053). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Casasanto, D. (2008). Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 58, 6379.
  • Casati, R., & Varzi, A. (2008). Event concepts. In T. Shipley, & J. Zacks (Eds.), Understanding events (pp. 3155). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dahl, Ö. (Ed.) (2000). Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Davidoff, J., Davies, I., & Roberson, D. (1999). Colour categories of a stone-age tribe. Nature, 398, 203204.
  • Downing, P. A. (1996). Numeral classifier systems: The case of Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Feist, M. (2010). Motion through syntactic frames. Cognition, 115, 192196.
  • Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K. (2007). Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 182196.
  • Gennari, S., Sloman, S., Malt, B., & Fitch, W. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 4979.
  • Imai, M., & Gentner, D. (1997). A crosslinguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62, 169200.
  • Imai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2003). Re-evaluation of linguistic relativity: Language-specific categories and the role of universal ontological knowledge in the construal of individuation. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the issues of language and thought (pp. 430464). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Imai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2007). Revisiting language universals and linguistic relativity: Language-relative construal of individuation constrained by universal ontology. Cognitive Science, 31, 385414.
  • Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?American Anthropologist, 86, 6579.
  • Kvist-Darnell, U. (2005). Utvidgade och andra användningar av de svenska verben sitta, stå, och ligga. In G. Byrman, J. Einarsson, S. Hammarbäck, M. Lindgren, & P. Stille (Eds.), Svenskans beskrivning 27 (pp. 148160). Växjö: Växjö University Press.
  • Lakusta, L., & Landau, B. (2005). Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition, 96, 133.
  • Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Levinson, S. C. (2001). Covariation between spatial language and cognition, and its implications for language learning. In M. Bowerman, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 566588). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Levinson, S. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lucy, J. (1992). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lucy, J.A. (1997). Linguistic relativityAnnual Review of Anthropology, 26, 291312.
  • Madden, C., & Zwaan, R. (2003). How does verb aspect constrain event representations?Memory & Cognition, 31, 663672.
  • Magliano, J. P., & Schleich, M. C. (2000). Verb aspect and situation models. Discourse Processes, 29, 83112.
  • Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D., & Levinson, S. (2004). Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 108114.
  • Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: Dial.
  • Naigles, L., & Terrazas, P. (1998). Motion verb generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of language and syntax. Psychological Science, 9, 363369.
    Direct Link:
  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Papafragou, A. (2010). Source-goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive Science, 34, 10641092.
  • Papafragou, A., Hulbert, J., & Trueswell, J. (2008). Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 108, 155184.
  • Papafragou, A., Massey, C., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84, 189219.
  • Papafragou, A., & Selimis, S. (2010). Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 224260.
  • Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. London: Penguin.
  • Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. New York: Viking.
  • Radden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Regier, T., & Kay, P. (2009). Language, thought and color: Whorf was half right. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 439446.
  • Regier, T., Kay, P., & Khetarpal, N. (2007). Color naming reflects optimal partitions of color space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 14361441.
  • Regier, T., & Zheng, M. (2007). Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science, 31, 705719.
  • Roberson, D., & Davidoff, J. (2000). The categorical perception of colours and facial expressions: The effect of verbal interference. Memory & Cognition, 28, 977986.
  • Roberson, D., Davies, I., & Davidoff, J. (2000). Colour categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 369398.
  • Schmiedtová, B., Carroll, M., & von Stutterheim, C. (2011). Implications of language-specific patterns of event construal of advanced L2 speakers. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Thinking and speaking in two languages (pp. 66107). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Schmiedtová, B., v. Stutterheim, Ch., & Carroll, M. (2011). Implications of language-specific patterns in event construal of advanced L2 speakers. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.) Thinking and speaking in two languages, (pp. 66107). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Schmiedtová, B., & Sahonenko, N. (2008). Die Rolle des grammatischen Aspekts in Ereignis Enkodierung: Ein Vergleich zwischen tschechischen und russischen Lernern des Deutschen. In P. Gommes, & M. Walter (Eds.), Fortgeschrittene Lernervarietäten: Korpuslinguistik und Zweitspracherwerbforschung (pp. 4571). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
  • Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 7096). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Slobin, D. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind. Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157191). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Slobin, D., & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed language: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20, 487505.
  • von Stutterheim, C. (2003). Linguistic structure and information organisation. The case of very advanced learners. In S. Foster-Cohen, & S. Pekarek-Doehler (Eds), EuroSLA yearbook (pp. 183206). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • von Stutterheim, C., Carroll, M., & Klein, W. (2003). Two ways of construing complex temporal structures. In F. Lenz (Ed.), Deictic conceptualization of space, time and person (pp. 97133). Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • von Stutterheim, C., & Nüse, R. (2003). Processes of conceptualization in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics, 41, 851881.
  • von Stutterheim, C., Nüse, R., & Murcia-Serra, J. (2002). Crosslinguistic differences in the conceptualization of events. In H. Hasselgård, S. Johansson, B. Behrens, & C. Fabricius-Hansen (Eds.), Information structure in a crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 179198). Amsterdam: Ropodi.
  • Takano, H. (1994). Japanese common nouns and their unquantificational nature. In N. Akatsuka (Ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 4 (pp. 379394). Leland Stanford Junior University: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
  • Talmy, L. (1975). Semantics and syntax of motion. In J. P. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (pp. 181238). New York: Academic Press.
  • Talmy, L. (1988). The relation of grammar to cognition. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics (pp. 165205). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., & Kuipers, J. (2009). Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on pre-attentive colour perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 45674570.
  • Traugott, E. C. (1978). On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language: Vol. 3. Word structure (pp. 369400). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Trueswell, J. C., & Papafragou, A. (2010). Perceiving and remembering events cross linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 6482.
  • Whorf, B. L. (19401956). Linguistics as an exact science. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought, and reality. Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp. 220232). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Willits, J., Sussman, R., & Amato, M. (2009). Event knowledge vs. verb knowledge. In N. Taatgen, H. van Rijn (Ed.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 22272232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on colour discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 77807785.
  • Zheng, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2002). Thought before language: How deaf and hearing children express motion events across cultures. Cognition, 85, 145175.