SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Amigó, E., Gonzalo, J., Artiles, J., & Verdejo, F. (2009). A comparison of extrinsic clustering evaluation metrics based on formal constraints. Information Retrieval, 12, 461486.
  • Baumann, M. (1995). The production of syllables in connected speech. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
  • Beddor, P. S., Harnsberger, J. D., & Lindemann, S. (2002). Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: Acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 591627.
  • Best, C. T. (1995). Learning to perceive the sound patterns of English. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (pp. 217304). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • de Boer, B., & Kuhl, P. K. (2003). Investigating the role of infant-directed speech with a computer model. Acoustics Research Letters Online, 4, 129134.
  • Boersma, P., Escudero, P., & Hayes, R. (2003). Learning abstract phonological from auditory phonetic categories: An integrated model for the acquisition of language-specific sound categories. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, 3–9 August, pp. 10131016.
  • Boersma, P., & Hayes, R. (2001). Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 4586.
  • Chambers, K., Onishi, K., & Fisher, C. (2003). Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience. Cognition, 87, B69B77.
  • Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Coen, M. (2006). Self-supervised acquisition of vowels in American English. Proceedings of the Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 06), Boston MA, July 16–20, 2006, pp. 14511456.
  • Cohn, A. (1990). Phonetic and phonological rules of nasalization. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
  • Cole, J., Linebaugh, G., Munson, C., & McMurray, B. (2010). Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: A statistical modeling approach. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 167184.
  • Cox, R. T. (1946). Probability, frequency, and reasonable expectation. American Journal of Physics, 14, 113.
  • Dawid, A. P. (1981). Some matrix-variate distribution theory: Notational considerations and a Bayesian application. Biometrika, 68, 265274.
  • Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum Likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39 (1), 138.
  • Denis, D., & Pollard, M. (2008). A phonetic analysis of the Inuktitut vowel space. Inuktitut Linguistics Workshop, Toronto, 22–23 March.
  • Dietrich, C., Swingley, D., & Werker, J. F. (2007). Native language governs interpretation of salient speech sound differences at 18 months. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 454464.
  • Dorais, L.-J. (1986). Inuktitut surface phonology: A trans-dialectal survey. International Journal of American Linguistics, 52 (1), 2053.
  • Dresher, B. E. (2009). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Duda, R., Hart, P., & Stork, D. (2000). Pattern classification. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Duong, T. (2011). ks: Kernel smoothing. R package version 1.8.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ks (Accessed 20 May, 2011).
  • Dyck, C.1995. Constraining the phonology-phonetics interface with exemplification from Spanish and Italian dialects. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
  • Escobar, M., & West, M. (1995). Bayesian density estimation and interference using mixtures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 577588.
  • Fant, C. G. M. (1960). Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton.
  • Feldman, N. H., Griffiths, T. L., & Morgan, J. L. (2009). Learning phonetic categories by learning a lexicon. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam, 29 July–1 August.
  • Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D., Pethick, S., Tomasello, M., Mervis, C., & Stiles, J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 1185.
  • Ferguson, T. S. (1973). A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems. The Annals of Statistics, 1, 209230.
  • Flemming, E. (2001). Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology, 18, 744.
  • Fourakis, M., & Iverson, G. (1984). On the “incomplete” neutralization of German final obstruents. Phonetica, 41, 140149.
  • Geweke, J. (1992). Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to calculating posterior moments. In J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, & A. F. M. Smith, (Eds.), Bayesian Statistics 4. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  • Goldsmith, J. A. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Linguistics Club.
  • Goldsmith, J., & Xanthos, A. (2009). Learning phonological categories. Language, 85, 438.
  • Griffiths, T. L., Canini, K. R., Sanborn, A. N., & Navarro, D. J. (2007). Unifying rational models of categorization via the hierarchical Dirichlet process. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Nashville, 1–4 August.
  • Hale, M., & Reiss, C. (2008). The phonological enterprise. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Harris, Z. (1951). Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hayes, B. (2004). Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: The early stages. In R. Kager, J. Pater, & W. Zonneveld, (Eds.), Fixing priorities: Constraints in phonological acquisition (pp. 158203). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Iverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K. (1996). Influences of phonetic identification and category goodness on American listeners’ perception of/r/and/l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 11301140.
  • Jakobson, R. (1941). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
  • Jaynes, E. T., & Bretthorst, G. (2003). Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Johns, A. (2009). Additional facts about noun incorporation (in Inuktitut). Lingua, 119, 185198.
  • Johnson, K. (1997). The auditory/perceptual basis for speech segmentation. Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics, 50, 101113.
  • Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2000). Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Jusczyk, P. W. (1985). On characterizing the development of speech perception. In J. Mehler & R. Fox (Eds.), Neonate cognition: Beyond the blooming, buzzing, confusion (pp. 199229). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Kazanina, N., Phillips, C., & Idsardi, W. (2006). The influence of meaning on the perception of speech sound contrasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 1138111386.
  • Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  • Kenstowicz, M., & Kisseberth, C. (1979). Generative phonology. San Diego, CA: Academic Publishers
  • Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93107.
  • Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606608.
  • Kuriyagawa, F. (1984). The features of/k/and/q/in Cairo Standard Arabic. Annual Bulletin, Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (RILP), University of Tokyo, 18, 6573.
  • Ladefoged, P. (2001). Vowels and consonants: An introduction to the sounds of languages. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Lin, Y., & Mielke, J. (2008). Discovering place and manner features: What can be learned from acoustic and articulatory data. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 241254.
  • Manuel, S. (1990). The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 12861298.
  • Martin, J., Johnson, H., Farley, B., & Maclachlan, A. (2003). Aligning and using an English-Inuktitut parallel corpus. Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Building and Using Parallel Texts: Data Driven Machine Translation and Beyond, Edmonton, 31 May.
  • Maye, J., Daland, R., & Goldrick, M. (2008). Phonological context as a cue to phonetic identity. Paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America in Chicago, IL, January 3–6.
  • Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101B111.
  • McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley.
  • McMurray, B., Aslin, R., & Toscano, J. (2009). Statistical learning of phonetic categories: Computational insights and limitations. Developmental Science, 12, 369378.
  • Neal, R. M. (2000). Markov chain sampling methods for Dirichlet process mixture models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 9, 249265.
  • Nearey, T. M. (1990). The segment as a unit of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 347373.
  • Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2001). The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 349357.
  • Ohala, J. (1976). A model of speech aerodynamics. Report of the Phonology Laboratory, Berkeley, 1, 93107.
  • Öhman, S. (1966). Coarticulation in VCV utterances: Spectrographic measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 151168.
  • Pasquale, M. (2009). Phonological variation in a Peruvian Quechua speech community. In J. Stanford & D. Preston (Eds.), Variation in indigenous minority languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Peperkamp, S., Le Calvez, R., Nadal, J.-P., & Dupoux, E. (2006). The acquisition of allophonic rules: Statistical learning with linguistic constraints. Cognition, 101, B31B41.
  • Peperkamp, S., Pettinato, M., & Dupoux, E. (2003). Allophonic variation and the acquisition of phoneme categories. In B. Beachley, A. Brown, & F. Conlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Volume 2 (pp. 650661). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Pierrehumbert, J. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 46 (2-3), 115154.
  • Port, R., & Crawford, P. (1989). Pragmatic effects on neutralization rules. Journal of Phonetics, 16, 257282.
  • Port, R., & Leary, A. (2005). Against formal phonology. Language, 81, 927964.
  • Port, R., & O’Dell, M. (1986). Neutralization of syllable-final devoicing in German. Journal of Phonetics, 13, 455471.
  • Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
  • Pulleyblank, D., & Turkel, W. (1998). The logical problem of language acquisition in Optimality Theory. In P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis, & D. Pesetsky (Eds.), Is the best good enough? Optimality and competition in syntax (pp. 399420). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Rischel, J. (1974). Topics in West Greenlandic phonology: Regularities underlying the appearance of wordforms in a polysynthetic language. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
  • Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 19261928.
  • Seidl, A., Cristià, A., Bernard, A., & Onishi, K. (2009). Allophones and phonemes in infants’ phonotactic learning. Language, Learning, & Development, 5, 191202.
  • Silverman, D.2006. A critical introduction to phonology: Of sound, mind and body. New York: Continuum.
  • Sledd, J. H. (1966). Breaking, umlaut, and the southern drawl. Language, 42, 1841.
  • Slowiaczek, L., & Dinnsen, D. (1985). On the neutralizing status of Polish word-final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 13, 325341.
  • Stevens, K. N. (1986). Models of phonetic recognition. II. A feature-based model of speech recognition. In P. Mermelstein (Ed.), Proceedings of the Montreal Satellite Symposium on Speech Recognition, Twelfth International Conference on Acoustics (pp. 6768).
  • Tesar, B., & Smolensky, P. (1998). Learnability in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 229268.
  • Vallabha, G., McClelland, J. L., Pons, F., Werker, J. F., & Amano, S. (2007). Unsupervised learning of vowel categories from infant-directed speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 1327313278.
  • Werker, J. F., Pons, F., Dietrich, C., Kajikawa, S., Fais, L., & Amano, S. (2007). Infant-directed speech supports phonetic category learning in English and Japanese. Cognition, 103, 147162.
  • Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1983). Developmental changes across childhood in the perception of non-native speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 278286.
  • Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 4963.
  • West, M. (1992). Hyperparameter estimation in Dirichlet process mixture models. ISDS Discussion Paper 92-A03, Duke University.
  • Whalen, D., Best, C., & Irwin, J. (1997). Lexical effects in the perception and production of American English/p/allophones. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 501528.
  • White, K., Peperkamp, S., Kirk, C., & Morgan, J. (2008). Rapid acquisition of phonological alternations by infants. Cognition, 107, 238265.