SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aks, D. J., Zelinksky, G. J., & Sprott, J. C. (2002). Memory across eye-movements: 1/f dynamic in visual search. Nonlinear Dynamics, 6, 125.
  • Amari, S. I. (1977). Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields. Biological Cybernetics, 27, 7787.
  • Bahrick, L. E., & Pickens, J. (1995). Infant memory for object motion across a period of three months: Implications for a four-phase function. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 343371.
  • Bastian, A., Schöner, G., & Riehle, A. (2003). Preshaping and continuous evolution of motor cortical representations during movement preparation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 20472058.
  • Bhatt, R. S., & Quinn, P. C. (2011). How does learning impact development in infancy? The case of perceptual organization Infancy, 16, 238.
  • Bogartz, R. S., Shinskey, J. L., & Speaker, C. J. (1997). Interpreting infant looking. The event set × event set design. Developmental Psychology, 33, 408422.
  • Brannon, E. M., Sumarga, S., & Libertus, K. (2007). Temporal discrimination increases in precision over development and parallels the development of numerosity discrimination. Developmental Science, 10, 770777.
  • Brown, C. J. (1974). The effects of preference for visual complexity on habituation of visual fixation in infants. Child Development, 45, 1161169.
  • Caron, R. F., & Caron, A. J. (1969). Degree of stimulus complexity and habituation of visual fixation in infants. Psychonomic Science, 14, 7879.
  • Cashon, C. H., & Cohen, L. B. (2000). Eight-month-old infants’ perception of possible and impossible events. Infancy, 1, 429446.
  • Clearfield, M. W., & Fisher Thompson, D. (2009). To look or not to look: The structure of looking and looking away in infant visual attention tasks. Poster presented at the 68th Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver, CO.
  • Cohen, L. B. (1972a). Attention-getting and attention-holding processes of infant visual preferences. Child Development, 43, 869879.
  • Cohen, L. B. (1972b). A two process model of infant visual attention. Paper presented at the Merrill Palmer Conference on Research and Teaching of Infancy Development.
  • Cohen, L. B. (2004). Uses and misuses of habituation and related preference paradigms. Infant and Child Development, 13, 349342.
  • Cohen, L. B., Deloache, J. S, & Rissman, M. W. (1975). The effect of stimulus complexity on infant visual attention and habituation. Child Development, 46, 611617.
  • Cohen, L. B., Gelber, E. R., & Lazar, M. A. (1971). Infant habituation and generalization to differing degrees of stimulus novelty. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 11, 379389.
  • Colombo, J., & Mitchell, D. W. (1990). Individual differences in early visual attention: Fixation time and information processing. In J. Colombo & J. Fagen (Eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, and prediction (pp. 193227). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Colombo, J., Mitchell, D. W., Coldren, J., & Atwater, J. D. (1990). Discrimination learning during the first year: Stimulus and positional cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 98109.
  • Compte, A., Brunel, N., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., & Wang, X. J. (2000). Synaptic mechanisms and network dynamics underlying spatial working memory in a cortical network model. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 910923.
  • Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. In W. M. Cowan (Ed.), Annual review of neuroscience (Vol. 18, pp. 193222). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc.
  • Dineva, E., Schöner, G., & Thelen, E. (2010). Behavioral history matters: A dynamic field theory of spontaneous and perseverative errors in infant reaching. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Edin, F., Macoveanu, J., Olesen, P., Tegner, J., & Klingberg, T. (2007). Stronger synaptic connectivity as a mechanism behind development of working memory-related brain activity during childhood. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 750760.
  • Fagan, J. F. (1973). Infants’ delayed recognition memory and forgetting. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 16, 424450.
  • Fisher-Thompson, D., & Peterson, J. A. (2004). Infant side biases and familiarity-novelty preferences during a serial paired-comparison task. Infancy, 5, 309340.
  • Flavell, J. H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.
  • French, R. M., Mareschal, D., Mermillod, M., & Quinn, P. C. (2004). The role of bottom-up processing in perceptual categorization by 3- to 4-month-old infants: Simulations and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133, 382397.
  • Funahashi, S., Bruce, C. J., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1989). Mnemonic coding of visual space in monkey’s dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 61, 331349.
  • Fuster, J. M. (2003). Cortex and mind: Unifying cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Georgopoulos, A. P., & Massey, J. T. (1988). Cognitive spatial-motor processes: Information transmitted by the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and by neuronal populations in primate motor cortex and area 5. Experimental Brain Research, 69, 315326.
  • Gibson, E. J. (1988). Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 131.
  • Gilmore, R. O., & Thomas, H. (2002). Examining individual differences in infants’ habituation patterns using objective quantitative techniques. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 399412.
  • Greenberg, D. J., O’Donnel, W. J., & Crawford, D. (1973). Complexity levels, habituation, and individual differences in early infancy. Child Development, 44, 569574.
  • Gurekis, T. M., & Love, B. C. (2004). Common mechanisms in infant and adult category learning. Infancy, 5, 173198.
  • Haith, M. M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is rich interpretation too costly? Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 167179.
  • Holden, J. G., Van Orden, G., & Turvey, M. T. (2009). Dispersion of response times reveals cognitive dynamics. Psychological Review, 116, 318342.
  • Horst, J. S., Oakes, L. M., & Madole, K. M. (2005). What does it look like and what can it do? Category structure influences how infants categorize Child Development, 76, 614631.
  • Hunter, M. A., & Ames, E. W. (1988). A multifactor model of infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. O. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 5, pp. 6995). Norwood, NJ: Albex.
  • Ihlen, E. A. F., & Vereijken, B. (2010). Interaction-dominant dynamics in human cognition: Beyond 1/f fluctuation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 436463.
  • Jancke, D., Erlhagen, W., Dinse, H. R., Akhavan, A. C., Giese, M. A., Steinhage, A., & Schoner, G. (1999). Parametric population representation of retinal location: Neuronal interaction dynamics in cat primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 90169028.
  • Jankowski, J. J., Rose, S. A., & Feldman, J. F. (2001). Modifying the distribution of attention in infants. Child Development, 72, 339351.
  • Johnson, M. H. (2002). The development of visual attention: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. In M. H. Johnson, Y. Munakata, & R. O. Gilmore (Eds.), Brain development and cognition: A reader (pp. 134150). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Johnson, J. S., Spencer, J. P., Luck, S. J., & Schöner, G. (2009). A dynamic neural field model of visual working memory and change detection. Psychological Science, 20, 568577.
    Direct Link:
  • Johnson, J. S., Spencer, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2009). A layered neural architecture for the consolidation, maintenance, and updating of representations in visual working memory. Brain Research, 1299, 1732.
  • Kagan, J. (2008). In defence of qualitative changes in development. Child Development, 79, 16061624.
  • Kirham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83, B35B42.
  • Kopecz, K., & Schöner, G. (1995). Saccadic motor planning by integrating visual information and pre-information on neural, dynamic fields. Biological Cybernetics, 73, 4960.
  • Kovack-Lesh, K. A., & Oakes, L. M. (2007). Hold your horses: How exposure to different items influences infant categorization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98, 6993.
  • Landry, S. H., & Chapieskie, M. L. (1988). Visual attention during toy exploration in preterm infants: Effects of medical risk and maternal interactions. Infant Behavior and Development, 9, 257269.
  • Landry, S. H., Smith, K. E., Swank, P. R., & Guttentag, C. (2008). A responsive parenting intervention: The optimal timing across early childhood for impacting maternal behaviors and child outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 44, 13351353.
  • Lewis, M. (1969). A developmental study of information processing within the first three years of life: Response decrement to a redundant signal. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35, 141.
  • Lipinski, J., Simmering, V. R., Johnson, J. S., & Spencer, J. P. (2010). The role of experience in location estimation: Target distributions shift location memory biases. Cognition, 115, 147153.
  • Lipinski, J., & Spencer, J. P. (2010). Biased feedback in spatial recall yields a violation of delta rule learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 581588.
  • Lipton, J. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). Origins of number sense: Large-number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 14, 396401.
    Direct Link:
  • Martin, R. M. (1975). Effects of familiar and complex stimuli on infant attention. Developmental Psychology, 11, 178185.
  • McDowell, K., Jeka, J. J., Schöner, G., & Hatfield, B. D. (2002). Behavioral and electrocortical evidence of an interaction between probability and task metrics in movement preparation. Experimental Brain Research, 144, 303313.
  • Miikkulainen, J. A., Bednar, Y. C., & Sirosh, J. (2005). Computational Maps in the Visual Cortex. New York: Springer.
  • Mobus, G. E., & Fisher, P. S. (1999). Foraging search at the edge of chaos. In D. Levie, V. R. Brown, & V. T. Shirey (Eds.), Oscillations in neural networks (pp. 309325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Oakes, L. M. (2010). Tools of the trade: Using habituation of looking time to assess mental processes in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 255268.
  • Oakes, L. M., Coppage, D. J., & Dingel, A. (1997). By land or by sea: The role of perceptual similarity in infants’ categorization of animals. Developmental Psychology, 33, 396407.
  • Oakes, L. M., Horst, J. S., Kovack-Lesh, K. A., & Perone, S. (2008). How infants learn categories. In A. Woodward & A. Needham (Eds.), Learning and the infant mind (pp. 144171). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Oakes, L. M., & Ribar, R. J. (2005). A comparison of infants’ categorization in paired and successive presentation familiarization tasks. Infancy, 7, 8598.
  • Oyama, S. (2002). The problem of change. In M. H. Johnson, Y. Munakata, & R. O. Gilmore (Eds), Brain development and cognition: A reader (pp. 1828). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Pancratz, C. N., & Cohen, L. B. (1970). Recovery of habituation in infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 9, 208216.
  • Parrinello, R. M., & Ruff, H. A. (1988). The influence of adult intervention on infants’ level of attention. Child Development, 59, 11251135.
  • Perone, S., Madole, K. L., Ross-Sheehy, S., Carey, M., & Oakes, L. M. (2008). The relation between infants’ activity with objects and attention to object appearance. Developmental Psychology, 44, 12421248.
  • Perone, S., Simmering, V. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2011). Stronger neural dynamics capture changes in infants’ visual working memory capacity over development. Developmental Science, 14, 13791392.
  • Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press, Inc.
  • Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget’s Theory. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 18, 4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Quinn, P. C., Eimas, P. D., & Rosenkrantz, S. L. (1993). Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3- and 4-month-old infants. Perception, 22, 463475.
  • Robertson, S. S., Bacher, L. F., & Huntington, N. L. (2001). The integration of body movement and attention in young infants. Psychological Science, 12, 523526.
    Direct Link:
  • Robertson, S. S., Guckenheimer, J., Masnick, A. M., & Bachner, L. F. (2004). The dynamics of infant visual foraging. Developmental Science, 7, 194200.
  • Robinson, C. W., & Sloutsky, V. A. (2004). Auditory dominance and its change in the course of development. Child Development, 75, 13871401.
  • Roder, B. J., Bushnell, E. W., & Sasseville, A. M. (2000). Infants’ preferences for familiarity and novelty during the course of visual processing. Infancy, 1, 491507.
  • Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., & Jankowski, J. J. (2001). Attention and recognition memory in the 1st year of life: A longitudinal study of preterm and full-term infants. Developmental Psychology, 37, 135151.
  • Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., & Jankowski, J. J. (2002). Processing speed in the 1st year of life: A longitudinal study of preterm and full-term infants. Developmental Psychology, 38, 895902.
  • Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., & Jankowski, J. J. (2004). Infant visual recognition memory. Developmental Review, 24, 74100.
  • Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., & Jankowski, J. J. (2007). Developmental aspects of visual recognition memory in infancy. In L. M. Oakes & P. J. Bauer (Eds.), Short- and long-term memory in infancy and early childhood (pp. 153178). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Rose, S. A., Gottfried, A. W., Melloy-Carminar, P. M., & Bridger, W. H. (1982). Familiarity and novelty preferences in infant recognition memory: Implications for information processing. Developmental Psychology, 18, 704713.
  • Ross-Sheehy, S., Oakes, L. M., & Luck, S. J. (2003). The development of visual short-term memory capacity in infants. Child Development, 74, 18071822.
  • Rost, G., & McMurray, B. (2009). Speaker variability augments phonological processing in early word learning. Developmental Science, 12, 339349.
  • Ruff, H. A. (1975). The function of shifting fixations in the visual perception of infants. Child Development, 46, 857865.
  • Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 19261928.
  • Schöner, G. (2009). Development as change of system dynamics: Stability, instability, and emergence. In J. P. Spencer, M. S. C. Thomas, & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Toward a unified theory of development: Connectionism and dynamic systems theory re-considered (pp. 2547). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Schöner, G., & Thelen, E. (2006). Using dynamic field theory to rethink infant habituation. Psychological Review, 113, 273299.
  • Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2009). Tests of the dynamic field theory and the spatial precision hypothesis: Capturing a qualitative developmental transition in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 16981725.
  • Schutte, A. R., Spencer, J. P., & Schoner, G. (2003). Testing the dynamic field theory: Working memory for locations becomes more spatially precise over development. Child Development, 74, 13931417.
  • Shultz, T. R., & Cohen, L. B. (2004). Modeling age differences in infant category learning. Infancy, 6, 153172.
  • Simmering, V. R. (2008). Developing a magic number: The dynamic field theory reveals why visual working memory capacity estimates differ across tasks and development, Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Iowa: Iowa City, IA.
  • Simmering, V. R., Spencer, J. P., & Schutte, A. R. (2007). Generalizing the dynamic field theory of spatial cognition across real and developmental time scales. Brain Research, 1202, 6886.
  • Sirois, S. (2004). Autoassociator networks: Insights into infant cognition. Developmental Science, 7, 133140.
  • Sirois, S., & Mareschal, D. (2004). An interacting systems model of infant habituation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 13521362.
  • Smith, L. B., Thelen, E., Titzer, R., & McLin, D. (1999). Knowing in the context of acting: The task dynamics of the A-not-B error. Psychological Review, 106, 235260.
  • Snyder, K. A. (2007). Neural mechanisms of attention and memory in preferential looking tasks. In L. M. Oakes & P. J. Bauer (Eds.), Short- and long-term memory in infancy and early childhood (pp. 179208). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Snyder, K. A. (2010). Neural correlates of encoding predict infants’ memory in the paired- comparison procedure. Infancy, 15, 270299.
  • Sokolov, E. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Macmillan.
  • Spelke, E. S. (1998). Nativism, empircism, and the origins of knowledge. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 181200.
  • Spencer, J. P., Dineva, E., & Schöner, G. (2009). Moving toward a unified theory while valuing the importance of initial conditions. In J. P. Spencer, M. S. C. Thomas, & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Toward a unified theory of development: Connectionism and dynamic systems theory re-considered (pp. 354372). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Spencer, J. P., & Perone, S. (2008). Defending qualitative change: The view from dynamical systems theory. Child Development, 79, 16391647.
  • Spencer, J. P., Perone, S., & Buss, A. T. (2011). Twenty years and going strong: A dynamic systems revolution in motor and cognitive development. Child Development Perspectives, 5, 260266.
  • Spencer, J. P., Perone, S., & Johnson, J. S. (2009). Dynamic field theory and embodied cognitive dynamics. In J. P. Spencer, M. S. C. Thomas, & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Toward a unified theory of development: Connectionism and dynamic systems theory re-considered (pp. 86118). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Spencer, J. P., & Schoner, G. (2003). Bridging the representational gap in the dynamic systems approach to development. Developmental Science, 6, 392412.
  • Spencer, J. P., Simmering, V. R., Schutte, A. R., & Schöner, G. (2007). What does theoretical neuroscience have to offer the study of behavioral development? Insights from a dynamic field theory of spatial cognition. In J. M. Plumert & J. P. Spencer (Eds.), The emerging spatial mind (pp. 320361). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Spencer, J. P., & Schoner, G. (2003). Bridging the representational gap in the dynamic systems approach to development. Developmental Science, 6, 392412.
  • Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 186.
  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Werker, J. F., Cohen, L. B., Lloyd, V. L., Cassasola, M., & Stager, C. L. (1998). Acquisition of word-object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 34, 12891309.
  • Wetherford, M. J., & Cohen, L. B. (1973). Developmental changes in infant visual preferences for novelty and familiarity. Child Development, 44, 416424.
  • Wilimzig, C., Schneider, S., & Schöner, G. (2006). The timecourse of saccadic decision making: Dynamic field theory. Neural Networks, 19, 10591074.
  • Younger, B. A., & Fearing, D. D. (2000). A global-to-basic trend in early categorization: Evidence from a dual-category habituation task. Infancy, 1, 4758.