SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arijon, D. (1976). Grammar of the film language. London: Focal Press.
  • Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • de Beaugrande, R. (1982). The story of grammars and the grammar of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 383422.
  • Black, J. B., & Bower, G. H. (1979). Episodes as chunks in narrative memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 187198.
  • Black, J. B., & Wilensky, R. (1979). An evaluation of story grammars. Cognitive Science, 3, 213230.
  • Block, B. (2008). The visual story. Oxford, England: Focal Press.
  • Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Bordwell, D. (2007). Poetics of cinema. New York: Routledge.
  • Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (1997). Film art: An introduction (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Branigan, E. (1992). Narrative comprehension and film. London: Routledge.
  • Brewer, W. F. (1985). The story schema: Universal and culture-specific properties. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning (pp. 167194). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1981). Event schemas, story schemas, and story grammars. In J. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 363379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6(5–6), 473486.
  • Bridgeman, T. (2004). Keeping an eye on things: attention, tracking, and coherence-building. Belphégor, 4(1), 118.
  • Bridgeman, T. (2005). Figuration and configuration: mapping imaginary worlds in BD. In C. Forsdick, L. Grove, & L. McQuillan (Eds.), The Francophone Bande Desinée (pp. 115136). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. New York: Academic Press.
  • Brown, B. (2002). Cinematography theory and practice. Oxford, England: Focal Press.
  • Buckland, W. (2000). The cognitive semiotics of film. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Butcher, S. H. (1902). The poetics of Aristotle (3rd ed.). London: Macmillian and Co. Ltd.
  • Carroll, J. M. (1980). Toward a structural psychology of cinema. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton
  • Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cohn, N. (2003). Early writings on visual language. Carlsbad, CA: Emaki Productions.
  • Cohn, N. (2007). A visual lexicon. Public Journal of Semiotics, 1(1), 5384.
  • Cohn, N. (2010a). Japanese Visual Language: the structure of manga. In T. Johnson-Woods (Ed.), Manga: An anthology of global and cultural perspectives (pp. 187203). New York: Continuum Books.
  • Cohn, N. (2010b). The limits of time and transitions: challenges to theories of sequential image comprehension. Studies in Comics, 1(1), 127147.
  • Cohn, N. (2011). A different kind of cultural frame: an analysis of panels in American comics and Japanese manga. Image [&] Narrative, 12(1), 120134.
  • Cohn, N. (2012). Structure, meaning, and constituency in visual narrative comprehension. Doctoral Dissertation, Medford, MA: Tufts University.
  • Cohn, N., Taylor-Weiner, A., & Grossman, S. (2012). Framing Attention in Japanese and American Comics: Cross-cultural Differences in Attentional Structure. Frontiers in Psychology - Cultural Psychology, 3, 112. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00349
  • Cohn, N., Paczynski, M., Jackendoff, R., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). (Pea)nuts and bolts of visual narrative: structure and meaning in sequential image comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 65(1), 138. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.01.003
  • Colin, M. (1995). The grande syntagmatique revisited. In W. Buckland (Ed.), The film spectator: From sign to mind (pp. 4586). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R. (2010). Quantitative methods alone are not enough: Response to Gibson and Fedorenko. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(6), 234235.
  • van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
  • Duncan, R. (2000). Toward a theory of comic book communication. In K. Fudge & M. R. Lloyd (Eds.), Academic forum (Vol. 17, pp. 7188). Arkadelphia, AR: Henderson State University.
  • Eisenstein, S. (1942). Film sense (J. Leyda, Trans.). New York: Harcourt, Brace World.
  • Eisner, W. (1985). Comics & sequential art. Tamarac, FL: Poorhouse Press.
  • Engelhardt, Y. (2002). The language of graphics. Doctoral Dissertation, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
  • Engelhardt, Y. (2007). Syntactic structures in graphics. Computational Visualistics and Picture Morphology, 5, 2335.
  • Fodor, J., & Bever, T. G. (1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4(5), 414420.
  • Freytag, G. (1894). Technique of the drama. Chicago: S.C. Griggs & Company.
  • Garnham, A. (1983). What’s wrong with story grammars?Cognition, 15, 145154.
  • Gee, J. P., & Grosjean, F. (1984). Empirical evidence for narrative structure. Cognitive Science, 8, 5985.
  • Gee, J. P., & Kegl, J. A. (1983). Narrative/story structure, pausing, and American Sign Language. Discourse Processes, 6, 243258.
  • Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse (J. E. Lewin, Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1985). Surface information loss in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 324363.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
  • Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430445.
  • Gibson, E., & Fedorenko, E. (2010). Weak quantitative standards in linguistics research. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(6), 233234.
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
  • Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512521.
  • Herman, D. (2003). Narrative theory and the cognitive sciences. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
  • Herman, D. (2009a). Basic elements of narrative. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Herman, D. (2009b). Cognitive approaches to narrative analysis. In G. Brône & J. Vandaele (Eds.), Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps (pp. 3043). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Herman, D. (2010). Multimodal storytelling and identity construction in graphic narrative. In D. Schiffrin, A. D. Fina, & A. Nylund (Eds.), Telling stories: Language, narrative, and social life (pp. 195210). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Hinds, J. (1976). Aspects of Japanese discourse. Tokyo: Kaitakusha Co., Ltd.
  • Hobbs, J. R. (1985). On the coherence and structure of discourse. Stanford, CA: CSLI Technical Report 8537.
  • Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Jackendoff, R. (1977). X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Jackendoff, R., & Lerdahl, F. (2006). The capacity for music: What is it, and what’s special about it?Cognition, 100, 3372.
  • Jacobs, J. (2001). The dimensions of topiccomment. Linguistics, 39(4), 641681.
  • Jahn, M. (1997). Frames, preferences, and the reading of third-person narratives: Towards a cognitive narratology. Poetics Today, 18(4), 441468.
  • Jahn, M. (2005). Cognitive narratology. In D. Herman, M. Jahn, & M.-L. Ryan (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 6771). London: Routledge.
  • Kehler, A. (2002). Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
  • Kraft, R. N., Cantor, P., & Gottdiener, C. (1991). The coherence of visual narratives. Communication Research, 18(5), 601616.
  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
  • Krifka, M. (2007). Basic notions of information structure. In C. Féry, G. Fanselow, & M. Krifka (Eds.), The notions of information structure (pp. 1354). Potsdam, Berlin: SFB.
  • Kunzle, D. (1973). The history of the comic strip (Vol. 1). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov (Ed.), Language in the inner city (pp. 354396). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 1244). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • Langacker, R. W. (2001). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 143188.
  • Lefèvre, P. (2000). Narration in comics. Image [&] Narrative, 1(1).
  • Madden, M., & Abel, J. (2008). Drawing words and writing pictures. New York: First Second Books.
  • Magliano, J. P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie. Discourse Processes, 22, 199224.
  • Magliano, J. P., Miller, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 533545.
  • Magliano, J. P., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). The impact of continuity editing in narrative film on event segmentation. Cognitive Science, 35(8), 14891517.
  • Mandler, J. M. (1978). A code in the node: the use of story schema in retrieval. Discourse Processes, 1, 1435.
  • Mandler, J. M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Mandler, J. M. (1987). On the psychological reality of story structure. Discourse Processes, 10, 129.
  • Mandler, J. M., & DeForest, M. (1979). Is there more than one way to recall a story?Child Development, 50, 886889.
  • Mandler, J. M., & Goodman, M. S. (1982). On the psychological validity of story structure. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 507523.
  • Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111151.
  • Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A. (1987). Rhetorical structure theory: A theory of text organization. Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute.
  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 171.
  • McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York: Harper Collins.
  • McCloud, S. (2006). Making comics. New York: Harper-Collins.
  • Metz, C. (1974). Film language: A semiotics of the cinema (M. Taylor, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436450.
  • Ohtsuka, K., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Discourse organization in the comprehension of temporal order in narrative texts. Discourse Processes, 15, 317336.
  • Primus, B. (1993). Word order and information structure: a performance based account of topic positions and focus positions. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Handbuch syntax (Vol. 1, pp. 880895). Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding (Vol. 211--236). New York: Academic Press.
  • Saraceni, M. (2000). Language beyond language: Comics as verbo-visual texts. Doctoral Dissertation, Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
  • Saraceni, M. (2001). Relatedness: Aspects of textual connectivity in comics. In J. Baetens (Ed.), The graphic novel (pp. 167179). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
  • Sasse, H.-J. (1987). The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics, 25, 511580.
  • Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Sinclair, R. (2011). Christ, it works for everything. Available at: http://www.robertsinclair.net/comic/asshole.html. Accessed March 12, 2011
  • Speer, N. K., & Zacks, J. M. (2005). Temporal changes as event boundaries: Processing and memory consequences of narrative time shifts. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 125140.
  • Stainbrook, E. J. (2003). Reading comics: A theoretical analysis of textuality and discourse in the comics medium. Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana, PA: Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
  • Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53119). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Stein, N. L., & Nezworski, T. (1978). The effects of organization and instructional set on story memory. Discourse Processes, 1(2), 177193.
  • Sternberg, M. (1982). Proteus in quotation-land: Mimesis and the forms of reported discourse. Poetics Today, 3(2), 107156.
  • Sternberg, M. (2001). How narrativity makes a difference. Narrative, 9(2), 115122.
  • Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49100.
  • Talmy, L. (1995). Narrative structure in a cognitive framework. In G. Bruder, J. Duchan, & L. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 421460). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Talmy, L. (2000a). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Talmy, L. (2000b). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Thorndyke, P. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77110.
  • Todorov, T. (1968). La Grammaire du récit. Langages, 12, 94102.
  • Tomashevsky, B. (1965). Thematics. In L. T. Lemon & M. I. Reis (Eds.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 6195). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612630.
  • Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words. Memory and Cognition, 19, 95112.
  • Yamazaki, M. (1984). On the art of the no drama: The major treatises of Zeami (J. T. Rimer, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Zacks, J. M., & Magliano, J. P. (2011). Film, narrative, and cognitive neuroscience. In D. P. Melcher & F. Bacci (Eds.), Art and the senses (pp. 435454). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., & Reynolds, J. R. (2009). Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 307327.
  • Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., & Maley, C. J. (2010). The brain’s cutting-room floor: Segmentation of narrative cinema. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 115.
  • Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 3562). New York: Academic Press.
  • Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292297.
    Direct Link:
  • Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162185.