SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Alishahi, A., & Stevenson, S. (2008). A computational model of early argument structure acquisition. Cognitive Science, 32(5), 789834.
  • Ambridge, B. (2011) Paradigms for assessing children's knowledge of syntax and morphology. In E. Hoff (Ed.) Guide to research methods in child language (pp. 113132). London: Blackwell-Wiley.
  • Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F. (2011). Children use verb semantics to retreat from overgeneralization errors: A novel verb grammaticality judgment study. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2), 303323.
  • Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F. (2012). Semantics versus statistics in the retreat from locative overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 123, 260279.
  • Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Chang, F. (2012). The roles of verb semantics, entrenchment and morphophonology in the retreat from dative argument structure overgeneralization errors. Language, 88(1), 4581.
  • Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Freudenthal, D., & Chang, F. (2012). The retreat from dative overgeneralization errors: Semantics, statistics or both?. Language & Cognitive Processes.
  • Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Jones, R. L., & Clark, V. (2009). A semantics-based approach to the “no negative evidence” problem. Cognitive Science, 33(7), 13011316.
  • Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Young, C. R. (2008). The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children's and adults' graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 106(1), 87129.
  • Baayen, R. H. (2011). LanguageR. R package version 1.4. R Core Development Team.
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2011). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-3.
  • Bod, R. (2009). From exemplar to grammar: A probabilistic analogy-based model of language learning. Cognitive Science, 33(5), 752793.
  • Bowerman, M. (1981). The child's expression of meaning: Expanding relationships among lexicon, syntax and morphology. Paper presented at the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on Native Language and Foreign Language Acquisition.
  • Bowerman, M. (1988). The “no negative evidence” problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In J. A. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 73101). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Boyd, J. K., & Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language, 85, 5583.
  • Braine, M. D. S., & Brooks, P. J. (1995). Verb argument strucure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar. In M. Tomasello, & W. E. Merriman (Eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children's acquisition of verbs (pp. 352376). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Brooks, P. J., & Tomasello, M. (1999). How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75(4), 720738.
  • Brooks, P. J., Tomasello, M., Dodson, K., & Lewis, L. B. (1999). Young children's overgeneralizations with fixed transitivity verbs. Child Development, 70(6), 13251337.
  • Brooks, P. J., & Zizak, O. (2002). Does preemption help children learn verb transitivity? Journal of Child Language, 29(4), 759781.
  • Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. E. (2005). Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8(6), 500508.
  • Chater, N., & Vitanyi, P. (2007). ‘Ideal learning’ of natural language: Positive results about learning from positive evidence. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 51(3), 135163.
  • Chouinard, M. M., & Clark, E. V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 637669.
  • Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clark, E. V., & Bernicot, J. (2008). Repetition as ratification: How parents and children place information in common ground. Journal of Child Language, 35(2), 349371.
  • Clark, E. V., Carpenter, K. L., & Deutsch, W. (1995). Reference states and reversals: Undoing actions with verbs. Journal of Child Language, 22(3), 633662.
  • Clark, E. V., & Clark, H. H. (1979). When nouns surface as verbs. Language, 55, 767811.
  • Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dabrowska, E., & Lieven, E. (2005). Towards a lexically specific grammar of children's question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(3), 437474.
  • Demetras, M. J., Post, K. N., & Snow, C. E. (1986). Feedback to first language learners: The role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language, 13(2), 275292.
  • Dowman, M. (2000). Addressing the learnability of verb subcategorizations with Bayesian inference. In L. Gleitman & A. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 107112). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Farrar, M. J. (1992). Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 9098.
  • Gahl, S., & Yu, A. C. L. (2006). Introduction to the special issue on exemplar-based models in linguistics. The Linguistic Review, 23, 213216.
  • Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Corpus evidence of the viability of statistical preemption. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 131154.
  • Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., & Goldberg, R. (1991). Syntax and semantics in the acquisition of locative verbs. Journal of Child Language, 18(1), 115151.
  • Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2008). Inference from absence in language and thought. In N. Chater, & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind (pp. 107112). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Hsu, A. (2009). Differential use of implicit negative evidence in generative and discriminative language learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 22, 754762.
  • Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction. Language, 75(1), 133.
  • Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow, & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 163). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
  • Li, P., & MacWhinney, B. (1996). Cryptotype, overgeneralization, and competition: A connectionist model of the learning of English reversive prefixes. Connection Science, 8, 330.
  • Lieber, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1993). Verbal prefixes in dutch: A study in lexical conceptual structure. In G. E. Booijand & J. Van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1993 (pp. 5178). Dordrecht, The Netherlands, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • MacKey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338356.
  • MacWhinney, B. (2004). A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 31(4), 883914.
  • Marchand, H. (1969). The categories and types of present-day English word-formation (2nd ed.). Munich, Germany: Verlag.
  • Marcus, G. F. (1993). Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition, 46(1), 5385.
  • Maslen, R. J. C., Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M. (2004). A dense corpus study of past tense and plural over-regularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47, 131933.
  • Matthews, D., & Bannard, C. (2010). Children's production of unfamiliar word sequences is predicted by positional variability and latent classes in a large sample of child-directed speech. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 465488.
  • Moerk, E. L. (1990). 3-Term contingency patterns in mother-child verbal interactions during 1st-language acquisition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54(3), 293305.
  • Naigles, L., Fowler, A., & Helm, A. (1992). Developmental shifts in the construction of verb meanings. Cognitive Development, 7, 403427.
  • Naigles, L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. R. (1993). Syntactic Bootstrapping and Verb Acquisition. In E. Dromi (Ed.), Language and cognition: A developmental perspective. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Onnis, L., Roberts, M., & Chater, N. (2002). Simplicity: A cure for overregularizations in language acquisition? In W. Gray, & C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 720725). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Penner, S. G. (1987). Parental responses to grammatical and ungrammatical child utterances. Child Development, 58(2), 376384.
  • Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Regier, T. (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition, 118, 306338.
  • Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Wonnacott, E. (2010). Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions. Journal of Child Language, 37, 607642.
  • Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ramscar, M., & Yarlett, D. (2007). Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 31, 927960.
  • Saxton, M., Backley, P., & Gallaway, C. (2005). Negative input for grammatical errors: Effects after a lag of 12 weeks. Journal of Child Language, 32(3), 643672.
  • Stefanowitsch, A. (2008). Negative evidence and preemption: A constructional approach to ungrammaticality. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(3), 513531.
  • Stefanowitsch, A. (2011). Constructional preemption by contextual mismatch: A corpus-linguistic investigation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 107129.
  • Strapp, C. M., Bleakney, D. M., Helmick, A. L., & Tonkovich, H. M. (2008). Developmental differences in the effects of negative and positive evidence. First Language, 28(1), 3553.
  • Suttle, L., & Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Partial productivity of argument structure constructions. Linguistics, 49(6), 12371269.
  • Theakston, A. L. (2004). The role of entrenchment in children's and adults' performance on grammaticality judgement tasks. Cognitive Development, 19(1), 1534.
  • Theakston, A. L., Maslen, R., Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M. (2012). The acquisition of the active transitive construction in English: A detailed case study. Cognitive Linguistics, 23(1), 91128.
  • Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Wonnacott, E. (2011). Balancing generalization and lexical conservatism: An artificial language study with child learners. Journal of Memory & Language, 65, 114.
  • Wonnacott, E., Newport, E. L., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a miniature language. Cognitive Psychology, 56(3), 165209.