SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Annan, V., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2002). Can indexes be voluntarily assigned in multiple object tracking? Journal of Vision, 2(7), 243a (Abstract.)
  • Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(4), 723767.
  • Banerjee, B., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010a). A constraint satisfaction framework for executing perceptions and actions in diagrammatic reasoning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 39, 373427.
  • Banerjee, B., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010b). A spatial search framework for executing perceptions and actions in diagrammatic reasoning. In A. K. Goel, M. Jamnik, & N. H. Narayanan (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference: Sixth international conference, Diagrams 2010 (pp. 144159). Berlin: Springer.
  • Barwise, J., & Etchemendy, J. (1990). Visual information and valid reasoning. In G. Allwein & J. Barwise (Eds.), Logical reasoning with diagrams (pp. 325). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Bauer, M. I., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). How diagrams can improve reasoning. Psychological Science, 4(6), 372378.
    Direct Link:
  • Brandt, S. A., & Stark, L.W. (1997). Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the content of the visual scene. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciene, 9(1), 2738.
  • Brockmole, J. R., & Irwin, D. E. (2005). Eye movements and the integration of visual memory and visual perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(3), 495512.
  • Chandrasekaran, B., Banerjee, B., Kurup, U., & Lele, O. (2011). Augmenting cognitive architectures to support diagrammatic imagination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 760777.
  • Chandrasekaran, B., Kurup, U., Banerjee, B., Josephson, J. R., & Winkler, R. (2004). An architecture for problem solving in diagrams. In A. Blackwell, K. Marriott, & A. Shimojima (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference: Third international conference, Diagrams 2004 (pp. 151165). Berlin: Springer.
  • Clark, A. (1997). Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Clark, A. (2011). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 719.
  • Damarais, A. M., & Cohen, B. H. (1998). Evidence for image-scanning eye movements during transitiveinference. Biological Psychology, 49(3), 229247.
  • DeLeeuw, K. E., & Hegarty, M. (2008). What diagrams reveal about representations in linear reasoning, and how they help. In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference: Fifth international conference, Diagrams 2008 (pp. 89102). Berlin: Springer.
  • Doran, M. M., Hoffman, J. E., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). The role of eye fixations in concentration and amplification effects during multiple object tracking. Visual Cognition, 17(4), 574597.
  • Farah, M. J. (1989). Mechanisms of imagery-perception interaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 203211.
  • Fehd, H. M., & Seiffert, A. E. (2008). Eye movements during multiple object tracking: Where do participants look? Cognition, 108, 201209.
  • Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2005). Reasoning about relations. Psychological Review, 112(2), 468493.
  • Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation. In J. L. Glasgow, N. H. Narayanan, & B. Chanrasekaran (Eds.), Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 535575). Cambridge, MA and Menlo Park, CA: The MIT Press and the AAAI Press.
  • Hoover, M. A., & Richardson, D. C. (2008). When facts go down the rabbit hole: Contrasting features and objecthood as indexes to memory. Visual Cognition, 12(6), 9791002.
  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Intons-Peterson, M. J. (1983). Imagery paradigms: How vulnerable are they to experimenters' expectations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(3), 394412.
  • Johansson, R., Holsanova, J., & Holmqvist, K. (2006). Pictures and spoken descriptions elicit similar eye movements during menral imgaery, both in light and in complete darkness. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 10531079.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006). Models and heterogeneous reasoning. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 18(2), 121148.
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175219.
  • Knauff, M. (2006). A neuro-cognitive theory of relational reasoning with mental models and visual images. In C. Held, M. Knauff, & G. Vosgerau (Eds.), Mental models and the mind (pp. 127152). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
  • Knauff, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2000). Visual and spatial representations in relational reasoning. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds), Proceedings of the twenty-second annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 759763). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Knauff, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). Visual imagery can impede reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 30(3), 363371.
  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1973). Scanning visual images: Some structural implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 14(1), 9094.
  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., & Ganis, G. (2006). The case for mental imagery. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kossylyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(1), 4760.
  • Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 549579.
  • Kulpa, Z. (2003). From picture processing to interval diagrams (Tech. Rep.). Warszawa: Instytut Podstawowych Problem?ow Techniki Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
  • Laeng, B., & Teodorescu, D.-S. (2002). Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual scene. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 207231.
  • Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. In J. I. Glasgow, N. H. Narayanan, & B. Chanrasekaran (Eds.), Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 69109). Cambridge, MA and Menlo Park, CA: The MIT Press and the AAAI Press.
  • Lindsay, R. K. (1988). Images and inference. In J. I. Glasgow, N. H. Narayanan, & B. Chandrasekaran (Eds.), Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 111135). Cambridge, MA and Menlo Park, CA: The MIT Press and the AAAI Press.
  • Manor, B. R., & Gordon, E. (2003). Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in free-viewing visuocognitive tasks. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 128, 8593.
  • Narayanan, N. H., Suwa, M., & Motoda, H. (1995). Hypothesizing behaviors from device diagrams. In J. I. Glasgow, N. H. Narayanan, & B. Chanrasekaran (Eds.), Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 501534). Cambridge, MA and Menlo Park, CA: The MIT Press and the AAAI Press.
  • Novak, G. (1988). Diagrams for solving physical problems. In J. I. Glasgow, N. H. Narayanan, & B. Chandrasekaran (Eds.), Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 111135). Cambridge, MA and Menlo Park, CA: The MIT Press and the AAAI Press.
  • Olivier, P. (2001). Diagrammatic reasoning: An artificial intelligence perspective. In A. F. Blackwell (Ed.), Thinking with diagrams (pp. 6378). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • O'Regan, K. J. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 461488.
  • Podgorny, P., & Shepard, R. N. (1978). Functional representations common to visual perception and imagination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(1), 2135.
  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88(1), 1645.
  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the finst spatial-index model. Cognition, 32(1), 6597.
  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2003). Seeing and visualizing: It's not what you think. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2007). Things and places: How the mind connects with the world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3(3), 179197.
  • Richardson, C. D., & Spivey, M. J. (2000). Representation, space, and hollywood squares: Looking at things that aren't there anymore. Cognition, 76(3), 269295.
  • Schwartz, D. L. (1995). Reasoning about the referent of a picture versus reasoning about the picture as the referent: An effect of visual realism. Memory and Cognition, 23(6), 709722.
  • Shimojima, A. (1995). Operational constraints in diagrammatic reasoning. In J. Barwise & G. Allwein (Eds.), Logical reasoning with diagrams (pp. 2748). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Shimojima, A. (1996). On the efficacy of representation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bloomington, IN: Department of Philosophy, Indiana University.
  • Shimojima, A., & Fukaya, T. (2003). Do we really reason about the picture as the referent? In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 10761081). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Sloman, A. (1971). Interactions between philosophy and artificial intelligence: The role of intuition and non-logical reasoning in intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 2(3–4), 209225.
  • Spivey, M. J., & Geng, J. J. (2001). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research, 65(4), 235241.
  • Spivey, M. J., Richardson, D. C., & Fitneva, S. A. (2004). Thinking outside the brain: Spatial indices to visual and linguistic information. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 161189). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Spivey, M. J., Richardson, D. C., Tyler, M. J., & Young, E. E. (2000). Eye-movements during comprehension of spoken scene descriptions. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 487492). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Stenning, K., & Lemon, O. (2001). Aligning logical and psychological perspectives on diagrammatic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 15(1–2), 2962.
  • Stenning, K., & Oberlander, J. (1995). A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19(1), 97140.
  • Trafton, J. G., Marshall, S., Mintz, F., & Trickett, S. B. (2002). Extracting explicit and implicit information from complex visualizations. In M. Hegarty, B. Meyer, & N. H. Narayanan (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference: Second international conference, Diagrams 2002 (pp. 206220). Berlin: Springer.
  • Trafton, J. G., & Trickett, S. B. (2001). A new model of graph and visualization usage. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 10481053). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Trafton, J. G., Trickett, S. B., & Mintz, F. E. (2005). Connecting internal and external representations: Spatial transformations of scientific visualizations. Foundations of Science, 10(1), 89106.
  • Trickett, S. B., & Trafton, J. G. (2007). "What if...": The use of conceptual simulations in scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 843875.
  • Ullman, S. (1984). Visual routines. Cognition, 18, 97159.
  • Yoon, D., & Narayanan, H. (2004). Mental imagery in problem solving: An eye tracking study. In A. T. Duchowski & R. Vertegaal (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (pp. 7784). New York: ACM Press.
  • Zelinsky, G. J., & Neider, M. B. (2008). An eye movement analysis of multiple object tracking in a realistic envirnment. Visual Cognition, 16(5), 553566.