SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baird, L. C. (1995). Residual algorithms: Reinforcement learning with function approximation. In A. Prieditis, & S. Russell (Eds.), Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML95) (pp. 3037). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
  • Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364390.
  • Becker, W., & Jürgens, R. (1979). An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research, 19, 967983.
  • Brysbaert, M., & Vitu, F. (1998). Word skipping: Implication for theories of eye movement control in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 125147). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
  • Clark, V. P., Fan, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (1995). Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 170187.
  • Clifton, C., Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements in reading words and sentences. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 341371). New York: Elsevier.
  • Drieghe, D. (2011). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements during reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 839855). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Drieghe, D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2007). Mislocated fixation can account for the parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 12361349.
  • Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Parallel graded attention models of reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 787800). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42, 621636.
  • Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777813.
  • Erhlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 641655.
  • Feng, G. (2006). Eye movements as time-series random variables: A stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 7095.
  • Fernando, C., Goldstein, R., & Szathmáry, E. (2010). The neuronal replicator hypothesis. Neural Computation, 22, 28092857.
  • Foxe, J. J., & Simpson, G. V. (2002). Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans: A framework for defining “early” visual processing. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 139150.
  • Fuchs, A. F. (1971). The saccadic system. In P. Bach-y-Rita, C. C. Collins, & J. E. Hyde (Eds.), The control of eye movements (pp. 343362). New York: Academic Press.
  • Häikiö, T., Bertram, R., Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P. (2009). Development of the letter identity span in reading: Evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 167181.
  • Hansen, N. (2006). The CMA evolution strategy: A comparing review. In J. A. Lozano, P. Larrañaga, I. Inza, & E. Bengoetxea (Eds.), Towards a new evolutionary computation. Advances in estimation of distribution algorithms (Vol. 192, pp. 75102). Berlin: Springer.
  • Hansen, N., & Kern, S. (2004). Evaluating the CMA evolution strategy on multimodal test functions. In X. Yao, E. Burke, J. A. Lozano, J. Smith, J. J. Merelo-Guervós, J. A. Bullianaria, J. Rowe, P. Tino, A. Kabán, & H.-P. Schwefel (Eds.), Eighth International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSV VIII). Vol. 3242 (pp. 282291). Berlin: Springer.
  • Hansen, N., Müller, S. D., & Koumoutsakos, P. (2003). Reducing the time complexity of the derandomized evolution strategy with covariance matrix adaptation (CMA-ES). Evolutionary Computation, 11, 118.
  • Hansen, N., & Ostermeier, A. (2001). Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evolutionary Computation, 9, 159195.
  • Igel, C., Hansen, N., & Roth, S. (2007). Covariance matrix adaptation for multi-objective optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 15, 128.
  • Inhoff, A. W., Eiter, B. M., & Radach, R. (2005). Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 979995.
  • Inhoff, A. W., & Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading, driving and scene perception (pp. 2953). New York: Elsevier.
  • Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., & Eiter, B. (2006). Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: Reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, and Rayner (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 14901495.
  • Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431439.
  • Joseph, H. S. S. L., Liversedge, S. P., Blythe, H. I., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2009). Word length and landing position effects during reading in children and adults. Vision Research, 49, 20782086.
  • Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2006). The role of age of acquisition and word frequency in reading: Evidence from eye fixation durations. Visual Cognition, 13, 846863.
  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329354.
  • Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2005). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research, 45, 153168.
  • Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2005). Fixation durations before work skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 132138.
  • Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1235.
  • Li, X., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred viewing location? Vision Research, 51, 11461156.
  • Liu, Y., & Reichle, E. D. (2010). The emergence of adaptive eye movements in reading. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrabone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 11361141). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Matin, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 899917.
  • McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., & Dyre, B. P. (1994). What are “normal” eye movements during reading: Toward a mathematical description. In J. Ygge & G. Lennerstand (Eds.), Eye movements in reading (pp. 315327). New York: Pergamon Press.
  • McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations in words. Vision Research, 28, 11071118.
  • McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., & Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 245253.
  • McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578586.
  • McConkie, G. W., Zola, D., Grimes, J., Kerr, P. W., Bryant, N. R., & Wolff, P. M. (1991). Children's eye movements during reading. In J. F. Stein (Ed.), Vision and visual dyslexia 13. London: MacMillan.
  • McDonald, S. A., Carpenter, R. H. S., & Shillcock, R. C. (2005). An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 112, 814840.
  • Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M.-H., Bentin, S., Aguera, P.-E., & Pernier, J. (2000). Neurophysiological correlates of face gender processing in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 303310.
  • Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2009). Mindless reading revisited: An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control. Vision Research, 49, 322336.
  • Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 22012217.
  • O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Optimal viewing position in words and the strategy-tactics theory of eye movements in reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 333354). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • O'Regan, J. K., & Lévy-Schoen, A. (1987). Eye-movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance, XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 329348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Pollatsek, A., Bolozky, S., Well, A. D., & Rayner, K. (1981). Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain and Language, 14, 174180.
  • Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Is covert attention really unnecessary? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 695696.
  • Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Balota, D. A. (1986). Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 123130.
  • Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006a). Attention to one word at a time is still a viable hypothesis: Rejoinder to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 14961500.
  • Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006b). Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: A response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005). Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 14851489.
  • Pynte, J., Kennedy, A., & Ducrot, S. (2004). The influence of parafoveal typographical errors on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 178202.
  • Radach, R., & Heller, D. (2000). Relations between spatial and temporal aspects of eye movements control. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 165192). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Rayner, K. (1979). Eye movements and cognitive psychology: On-line computer approaches to studying visual information processing. Behavior Research Methods & Instruments, 11, 164171.
  • Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 211236.
  • Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372422.
  • Rayner, K. (2009). The thirty-fifth Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention during reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 14571506.
  • Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 720732.
  • Rayner, K., & Bertera, J. H. (1979). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206, 468469.
  • Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191201.
  • Rayner, K., & Fischer, M. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 734747.
  • Rayner, K., & Juhasz, B. J. (2004). Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 340352.
  • Rayner, K., & Morrison, R. M. (1981). Eye movements and identifying words in parafoveal vision. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 135138.
  • Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1981). Eye movement control during rading: Evidence for direct control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 351373.
  • Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Drieghe, D., Slattery, T. J., & Reichle, E. D. (2007). Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 520529.
  • Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Liversedge, S. P., & Reichle, E. D. (2009). Eye movements and non-canonical reading: Comments on Kennedy and Pynte (2008). Vision Research, 49, 22322236.
  • Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 11881200.
  • Rayner, K., Slowiaczek, M. L., Clifton, C., & Bertera, J. H. (1983). Latency of sequential eye movements: Implications for reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 912922.
  • Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504509.
  • Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements (pp. 213234). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Reichle, E. D. (2011). Serial attention models of reading. In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 767786). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Reichle, E. D., & Drieghe, D. (in press). Using E-Z Reader to examine word skipping during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition.
  • Reichle, E. D., & Laurent, P. A. (2006). Using reinforcement learning to understand the emergence of “intelligent” eye-movement behavior during reading. Psychological Review, 113, 390408.
  • Reichle, E. D., Liu, Y., & Laurent, P. A. (2011a). The emergence of adaptive eye movement control in reading: Theory and data. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 9, 4552.
  • Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2009). Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 115119.
  • Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125157.
  • Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2012b). Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in non-reading tasks: A unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link. Psychological Review, 119, 155185.
  • Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445476.
  • Reichle, E. D., Tokowicz, N., Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011b). Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: Using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check. Psychophysiology, 48, 9931003.
  • Reilly, R., & O'Regan, K. J. (1998). Eye movement control during reading: A simulation of some word-targeting strategies. Vision Research, 38, 303317.
  • Reilly, R. G., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 3455.
  • Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H. (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 177206.
  • Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by backpropagating errors. Nature, 323, 533536.
  • Salvucci, D. D. (2001). An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding. Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 201220.
  • Schad, D. J., & Engbert, R. (2012). The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model. Visual Cognition, 20, 391421.
  • Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 12701281.
  • Sereno, S. C., Rayner, K., & Posner, M. I. (1998). Establishing a time-line of word recognition: Evidence from eye movements and event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 21952200.
  • Suppes, P. (1994). Stochastic models of reading. In J. Ygge & G. Lennerstrand (Eds.), Eye movements in reading (pp. 349364). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
  • Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Suttorp, T., Hansen, N., & Igel, C. (2009). Efficient covariance matrix update for variable metric evolution strategies. Machine Learning, 75, 167197.
  • Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97136.
  • Van Rullen, R., & Thorpe, S. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision-making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 454461.
  • Vitu, F., McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P., & O'Regan, J. K. (2001). Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 41, 35133533.
  • Vitu, F., O'Regan, J. K., Inhoff, A. W., & Topolski, R. (1995). Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading text. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 352364.
  • Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E. M., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H. (2010). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 705725.
  • Yang, S.-N. (2006). A oculomotor-based model of eye movements in reading: The competition/activation model. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 5669.
  • Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G. W. (2001). Eye movements during reading: A theory of saccade initiation time. Vision Research, 41, 35673585.