SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(6), 713770.
  • Barrett, J. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 2934.
  • Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  • Barrett, J. L. (2008). Coding and quantifying counterintuitiveness in religious concepts: Theoretical and methodological reflections. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 20, 308338.
  • Barrett, J. L., & Nyhof, M. A. (2001). Spreading non-natural concepts: The role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and transmission of cultural materials. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1(1), 69100.
  • Beardsworth, E., & Bishop, D. (1994). Assessment of long-term verbal memory in children. Memory, 2(2), 129148.
  • Bloom, P. (2004). Descartes' baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. New York: Basic Books.
  • Bloom, P. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10(1), 147151.
  • Boyer, P. (1994). The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
  • Boyer, P. (2000). Functional origins of religious concepts: Conceptual and strategic selection in evolved minds. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6(2), 195214.
  • Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.
  • Boyer, P. (2003). Religious thought and behaviour as by-products of brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 119124.
  • Boyer, P., & Barrett, H. C. (2005). Evolved intuitive ontology: Integrating neural, behavioral and developmental aspects of domain-specificity. In D. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 96118). New York: John Wiley.
  • Boyer, P., & Liénard, P. (2006). Why ritualized behavior? Precaution systems and action parsing in developmental, pathological, and cultural rituals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(6), 156.
  • Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates of religious concepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations. Cognitive Science, 25(4), 535564.
  • Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Courage, M., & Cowan, N. (2008). The development of memory in infancy and childhood (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Eliade, M. (1959). The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Gambrell, L. B., & Jawitz, P. B. (1993). Mental imagery, text illustrations, and children's story comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(3), 264276.
  • Gelman, S. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday life. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gonce, L. O., Upal, M. A., Slone, D. J., & Tweney, R. D. (2006). Role of context in the recall of counterintuitive concepts. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6, 521547.
  • Goody, J. (1987). The interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Graham, W. (1993). Beyond the written word: Oral aspects of scripture in the history of religion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Grimm, J., & Grimm, W. (2003). Grimm's fairy tales. New York: Barnes & Noble Classics. (Original work published 1869).
  • Harmon-Vukić, M., Upal, M. A., & Sheehan, K. J. (2012). Understanding the memory advantage of counterintuitive concepts. Religion, Brain, & Behavior, 2(2), 121139.
  • Norenzayan, A., Atran, S., Faulkner, J., & Schaller, M. (2006). Memory and mystery: The cultural selection of minimally counterintuitive narratives. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 531553.
  • Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. New York: Viking Penguin.
  • Pyysiäinen, I., & Hauser, M. (2010). The origins of religion: Evolved adaptation or by-product? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 104109.
  • Pyysiäinen, I., Lindeman, M., & Honkela, T. (2003). Counterintuitiveness as the hallmark of religiosity. Religion, 33(4), 341355.
  • Spelke, E., & Kinzler, K. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10(1), 8996.
  • Sperber, D. (1985). Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemiology of representations. Man, 20, 7389.
  • Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Sperber, D., & Hirschfeld, L. A. (2004). The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 4046.
  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Tweney, R. D., Upal, M. A., Gonce, L. O., Slone, D. J., & Edwards, K. (2006). The creative structuring of counterintuitive worlds. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6(3–4), 483498.
  • Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture. London: John Murray.
  • Upal, M. A. (2011). Memory, mystery, and coherence: Does the presence of 2-3 counterintuitive concepts predict cultural success of a narrative? Journal of Cognition and Culture, 11, 2348.
  • Upal, M. A., Gonce, L. O., Tweney, R. D., & Slone, D. J. (2007). Contextualizing counterintuitiveness: How context affects comprehension and memorability of counterintuitive concepts. Cognitive Science, 31(3), 415439.
  • Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1992). Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337375.
  • Zwaan, R. A. (1993). Aspects of literary comprehension: A cognitive approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.