SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Beebee, H., Hitchcock, C., & Menzies, P. (2009). The Oxford handbook of causation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Cane, P. (2002). Responsibility in law and morality. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
  • Chockler, H., & Halpern, J. Y. (2004). Responsibility and blame: A structural-model approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 22(1), 93115.
  • Collins, J. D., Hall, E. J., & Paul, L. A. (2004). Causation and counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Cambridge.
  • Dowe, P. (2000). Physical causation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Edgington, D. (2011). Causation first: Why causation is prior to counterfactuals. In C. Hoerl, T. McCormack, & S. R. Beck (Eds.), Understanding counterfactuals, understanding causation: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 230). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fenton, N., Neil, M., & Lagnado, D.A. (2012). A general structure for legal arguments about evidence using Bayesian networks. Cognitive Science, 37, 61102.
  • Gerstenberg, T., Ejova, A., & Lagnado, D. A. (2011). Blame the skilled. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 720725). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Gerstenberg, T., Goodman, N. D., Lagnado, D. A., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2012). Noisy Newtons: Unifying process and dependency accounts of causal attribution. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles, & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 378383). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Gerstenberg, T., & Lagnado, D. A. (2010). Spreading the blame: The allocation of responsibility amongst multiple agents. Cognition, 115(1), 166171.
  • Gerstenberg, T., & Lagnado, D. A. (2012). When contributions make a difference: Explaining order effects in responsibility attributions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 729736.
  • Gerstenberg, T., Lagnado, D. A., & Kareev, Y. (2010). The dice are cast: The role of intended versus actual contributions in responsibility attribution. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 16971702). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Glymour, C., Danks, D., Glymour, B., Eberhardt, F., Ramsey, J., Scheines, R., Spirtes, P., Teng, C, & Zhang, J. (2010). Actual causation: A stone soup essay. Synthese, 175, 169192.
  • Hall, N. (2007). Structural equations and causation. Philosophical Studies, 132, 109136.
  • Halpern, J. Y., & Hitchcock, C. (2010). Actual causation and the art of modeling. In R. Dechter, H. Geffner, & J. Y. Halpern (Eds.), Heuristics, probability and causality: A Tribute to Judea Pearl (pp. 383406). London: College Publications.
  • Halpern, J. Y., & Pearl, J. (2005). Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach. Part I: Causes. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56(4), 843887.
  • Hamilton, V. L. (1978). Who is responsible? Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution Social Psychology, 41, 316328.
  • Hamilton, V. L. (1986). Chains of command: Responsibility attribution in hierarchies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 118138.
  • Hart, H. L. A. (2008). Punishment and responsibility. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hiddleston, E. (2005). A causal theory of counterfactuals. Noûs, 39(4), 632657.
  • Hilton, D. J., McClure, J., & Sutton, R. M. (2010). Selecting explanations from causal chains: Do statistical principles explain preferences for voluntary causes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 383400.
  • Hitchcock, C. (2001). The intransitivity of causation revealed in equations and graphs. The Journal of Philosophy, 98(6), 273299.
  • Hitchcock, C. (2007a). Prevention, preemption, and the principle of sufficient reason. Philosophical Review, 116(4), 495532.
  • Hitchcock, C. (2007b). Structural equations and causation: Six counterexamples. Philosophical Studies, 144, 391401.
  • Honore, T. (1999). Responsibility and fault. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Hopkins, M., & Pearl, J. (2003). Clarifying the usage of structural models for commonsense causal reasoning. In P. Doherty, J. McCarthy, M. Williams (Eds), Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Logical Formalization of Commonsense Reasoning (pp. 8389). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
  • Hume, D. (1748/1975). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lagnado, D. A., & Channon, S. (2008). Judgments of cause and blame: The effects of intentionality and foreseeability. Cognition, 108(3), 754770.
  • Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 308324.
  • Lewis, D. (1973). Causation. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(17), 556567.
  • Lewis, D. (1986). Causal explanation. Philosophical Papers, 2, 214240.
  • Lewis, D. (2000). Causation as influence. The Journal of Philosophy, 97(4), 182197.
  • Mackie, J. (1974). The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Moore, M. S. (2009). Causation and responsibility: An essay in law, morals, and metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pearl, J. (2000/2009). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rapoport, A. (1987). Research paradigms and expected utility models for the provision of step-level public goods. Psychological Review, 94(1), 7483.
  • Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Sloman, S. A. (2005). Causal models: How people think about the world and its alternatives. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Sloman, S. A., & Lagnado, D. A. (2005). Do we ‘do’? Cognitive Science, 29(1), 539.
  • Spirtes, P., Glymour, C. N., & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, prediction, and search. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
  • Steward, H. (2010). Perception and the ontology of causation. In N. Eilan, H. Lerman, & J. Roessler (Eds.), Perception, causation and objectivity: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 139). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Suppes, P. (1970). A probabilistic theory of causation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Woodward, J. (2006). Sensitive and insensitive causation. Philosophical Review, 115(1), 150.
  • Woodward, J. (2011). Psychological studies of causal and counterfactual reasoning. In C. Hoerl, T. McCormack, & S. R. Beck (Eds.), Understanding counterfactuals, understanding causation: Issues in philosophy and psychology. (pp. 16) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Zimmerman, M. J. (1985). Sharing responsibility. American Philosophical Quarterly, 22(2), 115122.
  • Zultan, R., Gerstenberg, T., & Lagnado, D. A. (2012). Finding fault: Counterfactuals and causality in group attributions. Cognition, 125, 429440.