SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aikhenvald, A. (2000). Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Behrens, L. (2005). Genericity from a cross-linguistic perspective. Linguistics, 43(2), 275344.
  • Bender, A., Beller, S., & Klauer, K. C. (2011). Grammatical gender in German: A case for linguistic relativity? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(9), 18211835.
  • Boroditsky, L., & Schmidt, L. A. (2000). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 4247).
  • Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A., & Phillips, W. (2003). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 6180). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Corbett, G. G., & Fraser, M. N. (2000). Gender assignment: A typology and a model. In G. Senft (Ed.), Systems of nominal classification (pp. 293325). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Flaherty, M. (2001). How a language gender system creeps into perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(1), 1831.
  • Fox, A. (1990). The structure of German. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gao, Y., & Malt, B. C. (2009). Mental representation and cognitive consequences of Chinese individual classifiers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 11241179.
  • Gilbert, A. L., Regier, T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R. B. (2006). Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103, 489494.
  • Huettig, F., Chen, J., Bowerman, M., & Majid, A. (2010). Do language-specific categories shape conceptual processing? Mandarin classifier distinctions influence eye-gaze behavior, but only during linguistic processing. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 3958.
  • Imai, M., & Masuda, T. (2013). The role of language and culture in universality and diversity of human concepts. In M. Gelfand, C. Y. Chiu & Y. Hong (Eds.), Advances in culture and psychology, vol. 3 (pp. 161). New York: University Oxford Press.
  • Imai, M., & Mazuka, R. (2007). Revisiting language universals and linguistic relativity: Language-relative construal of individuation constrained by universal ontology. Cognitive Science, 31, 385414.
  • Imai, M., & Saalbach, H. (2010). Categories in mind and categories in language: Do classifier categories influence conceptual structures? In B. Malt & P. Wolff (Eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience (pp. 138164). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Konishi, T. (1993). The semantics of grammatical gender: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22(5), 519534.
  • Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Investigating linguistic relativity through bilingualism: The case of grammatical gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34, 843858.
  • Loftus, E. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lucy, J. (1992). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mizuguchi, S. (2004). Individuation in numeral classifier languages: A case of Japanese classifiers and plurals. Tokyo, Japan: Shohakusha.
  • Phillips, W., & Boroditsky, L. (2003). Can quirks of grammar affect the way you think? Grammatical gender and object concepts. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 928933).
  • Ramos, S., & Roberson, D. (2010). What constrains grammatical gender effects on semantic judgements? Evidence from Portugues. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 102111.
  • Roberson, D., Pak, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (2008). Categorical perception of colour in the left and right visual field is verbally mediated: Evidence from Korean. Cognition, 107, 752762.
  • Saalbach, H., & Imai, M. (2007). The scope of linguistic influence: Does a classifier system alter object concepts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 485501.
  • Saalbach, H., & Imai, M. (2012). The relation between linguistic categories and cognition: The case of numeral classifiers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 381428.
  • Saalbach, H., Imai, M., & Schalk, L. (2012). Grammatical gender and inferences about biological properties in German-speaking children. Cognitive Science, 36, 12511267.
  • Sera, M. D., Berge, C. A. H., & del Castillo Pintado, J. (1994). Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development, 9, 261292.
  • Sera, M. D., Elieff, C., Forbes, J., Burch, M. C., Rodriguez, W., & Dubois, D. P. (2002). When language affects cognition and when does it not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 377397.
  • Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 7096). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tan, L. H., Chan, A. H. D., Kay, P., Khong, P. L., Yip, L. K. C., & Luke, K. K. (2008). Language affects patterns of brain activation associated with perceptual decision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 40044009.
  • Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., & Kuipers, J.-R. (2009). Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 45674570.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453458.
  • Vigliocco, G., & Franck, J. (2001). When sex affects syntax: Contextual influences in sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 368390.
  • Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D., Indefrey, P., Levelt, W., & Hellwig, F. (2004). Role of grammatical gender and semantics in German word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 30, 483497.
  • Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Paganelli, F., & Dworzynski, K. (2005). Grammatical gender effects on cognition: Implication for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 501520.
  • Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 77807785.
  • Zubin, D., & Köpcke, K.-M. (1986). Gender and folk taxonomy: The indexical relation between grammatical gender and lexical categorization. In C. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 139180). Philadelphia: Benjamins.