SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aarts, H., Custers, R., & Wegner, D. M. (2005). On the inference of personal authorship: Enhancing experienced agency by priming effect information. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 439458.
  • Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (1998). Eight-and-a-half-month-old infants’ reasoning about containment events. Child Development, 69, 636653.
  • Ahn, W., & Kalish, C. W. (2000). The role of mechanism beliefs in causal reasoning. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 199225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ahn, W., Kalish, C. W., Medin, D. L., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition, 54, 299352.
  • Allan, L. G. (1993). Human contingency judgements: Rule based or associative? Psychological Bulletin, 114, 435448.
  • Amazeen, E. L., & Turvey, M. T. (1996). Weight perception and the haptic size weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 213232.
  • Anderson, J. R., & Sheu, C.-F. (1995). Causal inferences as perceptual judgments. Memory and Cognition, 23, 510524.
  • Baillargeon, R. (2008). Innate ideas revisited: For a principle of persistence in infants’ physical reasoning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 213.
    Direct Link:
  • Baillargeon, R., Li, J., Luo, Y., & Wang, S. (2006). Under what conditions do infants detect continuity violations? In Y. Munakata & M. H. Johnson (Eds.), Processes of change in brain and cognitive development: Attention and performance XXI (pp. 163188). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Blakemore, S.-J. (2003). Deluding the motor system. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 647655.
  • Blakemore, S.-J., Frith, C. D., & Wolpert, D. M. (1999). Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 551559.
  • Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 237242.
  • Bonawitz, E. B., Ferranti, D., Saxe, R., Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., Woodward, J., & Schulz, L. E. (2010). Just do it? Investigating the gap between prediction and action in toddlers’ causal inferences. Cognition, 115, 104117.
  • Bourgeois, K. S., Khawar, A. W., Neal, S. A., & Lockman, J. J. (2005). Infant manual exploration of objects, surfaces, and their interactions. Infancy, 8, 233252.
  • Buehner, M. J., & McGregor, S. (2006). Temporal delays can facilitate causal attribution: Towards a general timeframe bias in causal induction. Thinking and Reasoning, 12, 353378.
  • Bullock, M., Gelman, R., & Baillargeon, R. (1982). The development of causal reasoning. In W. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 209254). New York: Academic Press.
  • Bunge, M. (1963). Causality: The place of the causal principle in modern science. Cleveland, OH: World.
  • Bushnell, E. W., & Boudreau, J. P. (1993). Motor development and the mind: The potential role of motor abilities as a determinant of aspects of perceptual development. Child Development, 64, 10051021.
  • Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (2004). Physics and psychology of the muscle sense. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 2528.
    Direct Link:
  • Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cartwright, N. (2004). Causation: One word, many things. Philosophy of Science, 71, 805819.
  • Cartwright, N. (2007). Hunting causes and using them: Approaches in philosophy and economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Charpentier, A. (1891). Analyse experimentale de quelques elements de la sensation de poids [Experimental study of some aspects of weight perception]. Archives de Physiologie Normales et Pathologiques, 3, 122135.
  • Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70, 10981120.
  • Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367405.
  • Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365382.
  • Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (2005). Constraints and nonconstraints in causal learning: Reply to White (2005) and to Luhmann & Ahn (2005). Psychological Review, 112, 694707.
  • Cohen, L. B., Amsel, G., Redford, M. A., & Casasola, M. (1998). The development of infant causal perception. In A. Slater (Ed.), Perceptual development: Visual, auditory, and speech perception in infancy (pp. 167209). Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Cohen, L. B., & Oakes, L. M. (1993). How infants perceive simple causality. Developmental Psychology, 29, 421433.
  • Cole, J. D., & Sedgwick, E. M. (1992). The perceptions of force and of movement in a man without large myelinated sensory afferents below the neck. Journal of Physiology, 449, 503515.
  • Collins, D. J., & Shanks, D. R. (2002). Momentary and integrative response strategies in causal judgment. Memory and Cognition, 30, 11381147.
  • Danish, D., & Russell, J. (2007). The role of ‘action-effects’ and agency in toddlers’ imitation. Cognitive Development, 22, 6976.
  • De Biran, M. (1942). Oeuvres choisies de Maine de Biran [Selected works]. Paris: Aubier.
  • De Houwer, J., & Beckers, T. (2002). A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 289310.
  • Desmurget, M., & Sirigu, A. (2009). A parietal-premotor network for movement intention and motor awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 411419.
  • Dijkerman, H. C., & de Haan, E. H. F. (2007). Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 189239.
  • Flanagan, J. R., & Wing, A. M. (1997). The role of internal models in planning and control: Evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 15191528.
  • Frith, C. (2002). Attention to action and awareness of other minds. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 481487.
  • Gallagher, S., & Cole, J. D. (1995). Body image and body schema in a deafferented subject. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 16, 369390.
  • Gandevia, S. C., & Burke, D. (1992). Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 614632.
  • Gelfan, S., & Carter, S. (1967). Muscle sense in man. Experimental Neurology, 18, 469473.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477491.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Goodwin, G. M., McCloskey, D. I., & Matthews, P. B. (1972). The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain, 95, 705748.
  • Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., Kushnir, T., & Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111, 130.
  • Gopnik, A., & Schulz, L. (2004). Mechanisms of theory formation in young children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 371377.
  • Gopnik, A., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., & Glymour, C. (2001). Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: Two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. Developmental Psychology, 37, 620629.
  • Greco, C. C., Rovee-Collier, C., Hayne, P., Griesler, P., & Earley, L. (1986). Ontogeny of early event memory: I. Forgetting and retrieval by 2- and 3-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 9, 441460.
  • Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 334384.
  • Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). From mere coincidences to meaningful discoveries. Cognition, 103, 180226.
  • Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009). Theory-based causal induction. Psychological Review, 116, 661716.
  • Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 377
  • Gweon, H., & Schulz, L. (2012). 16-month-olds rationally infer causes of failed actions. Science, 332, 1524.
  • Haggard, P. (2005). Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 290295.
  • Harré, R., & Madden, E. H. (1975). Causal powers: A theory of natural necessity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Hart, H. L. A., & Honoré, A. M. (1985). Causation in the law (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Hattori, M., & Oaksford, M. (2007). Adaptive non-interventional heuristics for covariation detection in causal induction: Model comparison and rational analysis. Cognitive Science, 31, 765814.
  • Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358374.
  • Hernandez-Reif, M., Field, T., Diego, M., & Largie, S. (2001). Weight perception by newborns of depressed versus non-depressed mothers. Infant Behavior and Development, 24, 305316.
  • Hesslow, G. (1988). The problem of causal selection. In D. J. Hilton (Ed.), Contemporary science and natural explanation: Commonsense conceptions of causality (pp. 1132). Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.
  • Hilton, D. J., McClure, J., & Sutton, R. M. (2010). Selecting explanations from causal chains: Do statistical principles explain preferences for voluntary causes? European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 383400.
  • Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411428.
  • Holyoak, K. J., & Cheng, P. W. (2011). Causal learning and inference as a rational process: The new synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 135163.
  • Huang, C.-T., & Charman, T. (2005). Gradations of emulation learning in infants’ imitation of actions on objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 276302.
  • Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739).
  • Jamieson, R. K., Crump, M. J. C., & Hannah, S. D. (2012). An instance theory of associative learning. Learning and Behavior, 40, 6182.
  • Johansson, R. S., & Flanagan, J. R. (2009). Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 345359.
  • Jouen, F., & Molina, M. (2005). Exploration of the newborn's manual activity: A window into early cognitive processes. Infant Behavior and Development, 28, 227239.
  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. London: MIT Press.
  • Kelemen, D. (1999). Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Cognition, 70, 241272.
  • Kelemen, D., & DiYanni, C. (2005). Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children's reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 331.
  • Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111, 138143.
  • Koch, T. (2011). Disease maps: Epidemics on the ground. London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kolstad, V. (1994). Young infants’ performance of a means-end sequence. Poster session presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Paris.
  • Körding, K. P., Beierholm, U., Ma, W. J., Quartz, S., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Shams, L. (2007). Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE, 2, e943, 1–10.
  • Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 439453.
  • Kuhn, D., Schauble, L., & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 285327.
  • Kushnir, T., & Gopnik, A. (2005). Young children infer causal strength from probabilities and interventions. Psychological Science, 16, 678683.
    Direct Link:
  • Lafargue, G., Paillard, J., Lamarre, Y., & Sirigu, A. (2003). Production and perception of grip force without proprioception: is there a sense of effort in deafferented subjects? European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 27412749.
  • Leslie, A. M. (1982). The perception of causality in infants. Perception, 11, 173186.
  • Leslie, A. M. (1984). Spatiotemporal contiguity and the perception of causality in infants. Perception, 13, 287305.
  • Leslie, A. M., & Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition, 25, 265288.
  • Lober, K., & Shanks, D. R. (2000). Is causal induction based on causal power? Critique of Cheng (1997). Psychological Review, 107, 195212.
  • Lu, H., Yuille, A. L., Liljeholm, M., Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2008). Bayesian generic prior for causal learning. Psychological Review, 115, 955984.
  • Luhmann, C. C., & Ahn, W.-K. (2011). Expectations and interpretations during causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 568587.
  • Matthews, P. B. C. (1982). Where does Sherrington's “muscular sense” originate? Muscles, joints, corrollary discharges? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 5, 189218.
  • McClure, J., Hilton, D. J., & Sutton, R. M. (2007). Judgments of voluntary and physical causes in causal chains: Probabilistic and social functionalist criteria for attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 879901.
  • Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books.
  • Molina, M., & Jouen, F. (2004). Manual cyclical activity as an exploratory tool in neonates. Infant Behavior and Development, 27, 4253.
  • Muentener, P., & Carey, S. (2010). Infants’ causal representations of state change events. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 6386.
  • Muentener, P., & Lakusta, L. (2011). The intention-to-CAUSE bias: Evidence from children's causal language. Cognition, 119, 341355.
  • Nemeroff, C. (1995). Magical thinking about illness virulence: Conceptions of germs from “safe” versus “dangerous” others. Health Psychology, 14, 147151.
  • Nemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. (1989). “You are what you eat”: Applying the demand-free “impressions” technique to an unacknowledged belief. Ethos, 17, 5069.
  • Nemeroff, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). The contagion concept in adult thinking in the Unites States: Transmission of germs and of interpersonal influence. Ethos, 22, 158186.
  • Newman, G. E., Choi, H., Wynn, K., & Scholl, B. J. (2008). The origins of causal perception: Evidence from postdictive processing in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 262291.
  • Oakes, L. M. (1994). Development of infants’ use of continuity cues in their perception of causality. Developmental Psychology, 30, 869879.
  • Oakes, L. M., & Cohen, L. B. (1990). Infant perception of a causal event. Cognitive Development, 5, 193207.
  • Ogborn, J. (1985). Understanding students’ understandings: an example from dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 141150.
  • Parise, C. V., Spence, C., & Ernst, M. O. (2012). When correlation implies causation in multisensory integration. Current Biology, 22, 4649.
  • Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and evidence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Perales, J. C., & Catena, A. (2006). Human causal induction: A glimpse at the whole picture. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 277320.
  • Perales, J. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2007). Models of covariation-based causal judgment: A review and synthesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 577596.
  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
  • Pittenger, J. B. (1990). Detection of violations of the law of pendulum motion: observers’ sensitivity to the relation between period and length. Ecological Psychology, 2, 5581.
  • Rakison, D. H. (2006). Making the first move: How infants learn about self-propelled objects. Developmental Psychology, 42, 900912.
  • Rochat, P. (1987). Mouthing and grasping in neonates: Evidence for the early detection of what hard or soft substances afford for action. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 435449.
  • Rothwell, J. C., Traub, M. M., Day, B. L., Obeso, J. L., Thomas, P. K., & Marsden, C. D. (1982). Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. Brain, 105, 515542.
  • Rovee-Collier, C. (1991). The “memory system” of prelinguistic infants. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 517536.
  • Rozin, P., Millman, L., & Nemeroff, C. (1986). Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 703712.
  • Rozin, P., Nemeroff, C., Wane, M., & Sherrod, A. (1989). Operation of the sympathetic magical law of contagion in interpersonal attitudes among Amercicans. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 367370.
  • Sann, C., & Streri, A. (2008). The limits of newborns’ grasping to detect texture in a cross-modal transfer task. Infant Behavior and Development, 31, 523531.
  • Saxe, R., & Carey, S. (2006). The perception of causality in infancy. Acta Psychologica, 123, 144165.
  • Schauble, L. (1990). Belief revision in children: The role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 3157.
  • Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 299309.
  • Schulz, L. E., Bonawitz, E. B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2007). Can being scared cause tummy aches? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence, and preschoolers’ causal inferences. Developmental Psychology, 43, 11241139.
  • Schulz, L. E., Gopnik, A., & Glymour, C. (2007). Preschool children learn about causal structure from conditional interventions. Developmental Science, 10, 322332.
  • Schweinle, A., & Wilcox, T. (2004). Intermodal perception and physical reasoning in young infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 27, 246265.
  • diSessa, A. A. (1982). Unlearning Aristotelian physics: A study of knowledge-based learning. Cognitive Science, 6, 3775.
  • diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105225.
  • Shaklee, H., & Elek, S. (1988). Cause and covariate: Development of two related concepts. Cognitive Development, 3, 113.
  • Shaklee, H., & Goldston, D. (1989). Development in causal reasoning: Information sampling and judgment rule. Cognitive Development, 4, 269281.
  • Shanks, D. R. (1995). The psychology of associative learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Shanks, D. R., & Dickinson, A. (1987). Associative accounts of causality judgement. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 229261). New York: Academic Press.
  • Shultz, T. R. (1982). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47, 151.
  • Shultz, T. R., Fisher, G. W., Pratt, C. C., & Rulf, S. (1986). Selection of causal rules. Child Development, 57, 143152.
  • Shultz, T. R., & Kestenbaum, N. R. (1985). Causal reasoning in children. In G. Whitehurst (Ed.), Annals of child development (Vol. 2, pp. 195249). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Shultz, T. R., Pardo, S., & Altmann, E. (1982). Young children's use of transitive inference in causal chains. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 235241.
  • Sobel, D. M., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2006). Blickets and babies: The development of causal reasoning in toddlers and infants. Developmental Psychology, 42, 11031115.
  • Sobel, D. M., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007). Bayes nets and babies: Infants’ developing statistical reasoning abilities and their representation of causal knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 298306.
  • Sobel, D. M., & Munro, S. E. (2009). Domain generality and specificity in children's causal inference about ambiguous data. Developmental Psychology, 45, 511524.
  • Sosa, E., & Tooley, M. (Eds.), (1993). Causation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Spelke, E. S. (1994). Initial knowledge: Six suggestions. Cognition, 50, 431445.
  • Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605632.
  • Spelke, E. S., Katz, G., Purcell, S. E., Ehrlich, S. M., & Breinlinger, K. (1994). Early knowledge of object motion: Continuity and inertia. Cognition, 51, 131176.
  • Spelke, E. S., Phillips, A., & Woodward, A. L. (1995). Infants’ knowledge of object motion and human action. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 4478). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Streri, A., & Gentaz, E. (2003). Cross-modal recognition of shape from hand to eyes in human newborns. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 20, 1318.
  • Streri, A., & Gentaz, E. (2004). Cross-modal recognition of shape from hand to eyes and handedness in human newborns. Neuropsychologia, 42, 13651369.
  • Thagard, P. (2000). Explaining disease: Correlations, causes, and mechanisms. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 255276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Thelen, E. (1995). Motor development: A new synthesis. American Psychologist, 50, 7995.
  • Thompson, D. E., & Russell, J. (2004). The ghost condition: Imitation versus emulation in young children's observational learning. Developmental Psychology, 40, 882889.
  • Uzgiris, I. C. (1984). Development in causal understanding. Advances in Infancy Research, 3, 130135.
  • Wegner, D. M., & Wheatley, T. P. (1999). Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist, 54, 480492.
  • Weiner, B. (1985). ‘Spontaneous’ causal thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 7484.
  • White, P. A. (1988). Causal processing: Origins and development. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 3652.
  • White, P. A. (1989). A theory of causal processing. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 431454.
  • White, P. A. (2000). Causal judgement from contingency information: Relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgement. Memory and Cognition, 28, 415426.
  • White, P. A. (2005). The power PC theory and causal powers: Reply to Cheng (1997) and Novick and Cheng (2004). Psychological Review, 112, 675684.
  • White, P. A. (2009a). Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events. Psychological Review, 116, 580601.
  • White, P. A. (2009b). Property transmission: An explanatory account of the role of similarity information in causal inference. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 774793.
  • White, P. A. (2012a). The experience of force: The role of haptic experience of forces in visual perception of object motion and interactions, mental simulation, and motion-related judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 589615.
  • White, P. A. (2012b). Visual impressions of pushing and pulling: The object perceived as causal is not always the one that moves first. Perception, 41, 11931217.
  • White, P. A., & Milne, A. (1997). Phenomenal causality: impressions of pulling in the visual perception of objects in motion. American Journal of Psychology, 110, 573602.
  • Willatts, P. (1999). Development of means-end behavior in young infants: Pulling a support to retrieve a distant object. Developmental Psychology, 35, 651667.
  • Wolff, P. (2007). Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 82111.
  • Wolff, P., Barbey, A. K., & Hausknecht, M. (2010). For want of a nail: How absences cause events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 191221.
  • Wolff, P., & Song, G. (2003). Models of causation and the semantics of causal verbs. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 276332.
  • Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11, R729R732.
  • Zago, M., & Lacquaniti, F. (2005). Cognitive, perceptual and action-oriented representations of falling objects. Neuropsychologia, 43, 178188.
  • Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27, 172223.