SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Atran, S. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(4), 547569.
  • Bell, A. (1978). Language samples. Universals of human language, 1, 123156.
  • Berwick, R. (1985). The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bickel, B. (2001). What is typology?—a short note. Unpublished paper, University of Leipzig.
  • Bickel, B. (2007a). Absolute and statistical universals. The Cambridge encyclopedia of language sciences.
  • Bickel, B. (2007b). Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology, 11(1), 239251.
  • Bickel, B. (2008). A refined sampling procedure for genealogical control. STUF-Language Typology and Universals, 61(3), 221233.
  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris Publications.
  • Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program (Vol. 28). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Christiansen, M. H. (2000). Using artificial language learning to study language evolution: Exploring the emergence of word universals. In J. L. Dessalles, & L. Ghadakpour (Eds.), The Evolution of Language: 3rd International Conference (pp. 4548). Paris, France: Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications.
  • Chvatal, V. (1979). A greedy heuristic for the set-covering problem. Mathematics of Operations Research, 4(3), 233235.
  • Cinque, G. (2005). Deriving greenberg's universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(3), 315332.
  • Crain, S., Ni, W., & Conway, L. (1994). Learning, parsing, and modularity. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Culbertson, J., Smolensky, P., & Legendre, G. (2011). Learning biases predict a word order universal. Cognition, 122, 306329.
  • Cysouw, M. (2005a). Quantitative methods in typology. Quantitative Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Cysouw, M. (2005b). What it means to be rare: The case of person marking. In Z. Frajzyngier, & D. Rood (Eds.), Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Cysouw, M. (2010a). Dealing with diversity: Towards an explanation of NP-internal word order frequencies. Linguistic Typology, 14(2–3), 253286.
  • Cysouw, M. (2010b). On the probability distribution of typological frequencies. In C. Ebert, G. Jäger, & J. Michaelis (Eds.), The Mathematics of Language (pp. 2935). Berlin: Springer.
  • Daumé III, H. (2009). Non-parametric Bayesian areal linguistics. In Proceedings of human language technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 593601).
  • Davison, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997). Bootstrap methods and their application (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dediu, D. (2011). A bayesian phylogenetic approach to estimating the stability of linguistic features and the genetic biasing of tone. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1704), 474479.
  • Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Pica, P., & Spelke, E. (2006). Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 311(5759), 381.
  • Dryer, M. (1989). Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language, 13(2), 257292.
  • Dryer, M. (1991). SVO languages and the OV: VO typology. Journal of Linguistics, 27(2), 443482.
  • Dryer, M. (1992). The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language, 68(1), 81138.
  • Dryer, M. (1997). Why statistical universals are better than absolute universals. In Chicago Linguistic Society (Vol. 33, pp. 123145).
  • Dryer, M. (2000). Counting genera vs. counting languages. Linguistic Typology, 4, 334350.
  • Dryer, M. (2005). The order of subject, object and verb. In D. G. M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, & B. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures (pp. 330333). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Dryer, M. (2006). On Cinque on Greenberg's universal 20.
  • Dunn, M., Greenhill, S., Levinson, S., & Gray, R. (2011). Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature, 473(7345), 7982.
  • Ember, M. (1971). An empirical test of Galton's problem. Ethnology, 10(1), 98106.
  • Evans, N., & Levinson, S. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(05), 429448.
  • Gibson, E., & Fedorenko, E. (2010). The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(1/2), 88124.
  • Greenberg, J. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of grammar, 73113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hale, M., & Reiss, C. (2003). The subset principle in phonology: Why the tabula can't be rasa. Journal of Linguistics, 39(02), 219244.
  • Haspelmath, M. (2004). Does linguistic explanation presuppose linguistic description? Studies in Language, 28(3), 554579.
  • Haspelmath, M., & Siegmund, S. (2006). Simulating the replication of some of Greenberg's word order generalizations. Linguistic Typology, 10, 7482.
  • Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M., Gil, D., & Comrie, B. (2005). The World Atlas of Language Structures Online.
  • Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569.
  • Hawkins, J. (1983). Word order universals: Quantitative analyses of linguistic structure. New York: Academic Press.
  • Hudson Kam, C., & Newport, E. (2005). Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development, 1(2), 151195.
  • Hudson Kam, C., & Newport, E. (2009). Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology, 59(1), 3066.
  • Hunter, T., & Conroy, A. (2009). Children's restrictions on the meanings of novel determiners: An investigation of conservativity. In J. Chandlee, M. Franchini, S. Lord, & G.-M. Rheiner (Eds.), BUCLD 33 proceedings (pp. 245255). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
  • Jaeger, T., & Tily, H. (2011). On language ‘utility’: Processing complexity and communicative efficiency. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(3), 323335.
  • Janssen, D., Bickel, B., & Zúñiga, F. (2006). Randomization tests in language typology. Linguistic Typology, 10(3), 419440.
  • Jeffreys, S. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Kay, P., & Regier, T. (2003). Resolving the question of color naming universals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 9085.
  • Maslova, E. (2000). A dynamic approach to the verification of distributional universals. Linguistic Typology, 4(3), 307333.
  • Maslova, E. (2008). Meta-typological distributions. Language Typology and Universals, 61(3), 199207.
  • Mikhail, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), 143152.
  • Naroll, R. (1973). Galton's problem. In A handbook of methods in cultural anthropology, (pp. 974989). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
  • Newmeyer, F. (1998). The irrelevance of typology for grammatical theory. Syntaxis, 1, 161197.
  • Newmeyer, F. (2004). Typological evidence and universal grammar. Studies in Language, 28(3), 527548.
  • Nichols, J. (1992). Linguistic diversity in space and time. University of Chicago Press.
  • Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J., & Regier, T. (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition, 118, 306338.
  • Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J., Griffiths, T., & Xu, F. (2011a). A tutorial introduction to Bayesian models of cognitive development. Cognition, 120(3), 302321.
  • Perkins, R. (1989). Statistical techniques for determining language sample size. Studies in Language, 13(2), 293315.
  • Piantadosi, S., Goodman, N., & Tenenbaum, J. (2013). Modeling the acquisition of quantifier semantics: A case study in function word learnability. Under review.
  • Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306(5695), 499.
  • Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 12, 707784.
  • Rijkhof, J., & Bakker, D. (1998). Language sampling. Linguistic Typologie, 2(2–3), 263314.
  • Rijkhoff, J. (1990). Explaining word order in the noun phrase. Linguistics, 28(1), 542.
  • Rijkhoff, J. (1998). Order in the noun phrase of the languages of Europe. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 20, 321382.
  • Rijkhoff, J. (2002). The noun phrase. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Rijkhoff, J., Bakker, D., Hengeveld, K., & Kahrel, P. (1993). A method of language sampling. Studies in Language, 17(1), 169203.
  • Smolensky, P. (1996). The initial state and ‘richness of the base’ in Optimality Theory (Technical Report). Johns Hopkins University, Department of Cognitive Science. Baltimore, MD
  • Tily, H., & Jaeger, T. (2011). Complementing quantitative typology with behavioral approaches: Evidence for typological universals. Linguistic Typology, 15(2), 497508.
  • Tily, H., Frank, M., & Jaeger, T. (2011). The learnability of constructed languages reflects typological patterns. In Proceedings of Cognitive Science Society, 33, 13641369.
  • Tomlin, R. (1986). Basic word order: Functional principles. Kent, UK: Routledge Kegan & Paul.
  • Wexler, K., & Culicover, P. (1983). Formal principles of language acquisition. Kent, UK: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Wexler, K., & Manzini, R. (1984). Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In T. Roeper, & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter Setting. Reidel.
  • Wohlgemuth, J., & Cysouw, M. (2010a). Rara & Rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity (Vol. 46). The Hague: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Wohlgemuth, J., & Cysouw, M. (2010b). Rethinking universals: How rarities affect linguistic theory (Vol. 45). The Hague: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. (2007). Sensitivity to sampling in Bayesian word learning. Developmental Science, 10(3), 288297.