SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463496.
  • Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., & Rutström, E. E. (2010). Behavioral econometrics for psychologists. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31, 553576.
  • Arieli, A., Ben-Ami, Y., & Rubinstein, A. (2011). Tracking decision makers under uncertainty. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3, 6876.
  • Besag, J. (1989). A candidate's formula: A curious result in Bayesian prediction. Biometrika, 76, 183.
  • Booij, A. S., van Praag, B. M. S., & van de Kuilen, G. (2010). A parametric analysis of prospect theory's functionals for the general population. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 68, 115148.
  • Brooks, S. P., & Gelman, A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 434.
  • Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 771791.
  • Chib, S. (1995). Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 13131321.
  • Chib, S., & Jeliazkov, I. (2001). Marginal likelihood from the Metropolis–Hastings output. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 270281.
  • Dickey, J. (1971). The weighted likelihood ratio, linear hypotheses on normal location parameters. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 42, 204223.
  • Green, L., Fry, A., & Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5, 3336.
    Direct Link:
  • Hammersley, J. M., & Handscomb, D. C. (1964). Monte Carlo methods. London: Methuen & Co.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 363391.
  • Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773795.
  • Keller, L. R., & Strazzera, E. (2002). Examining predictive accuracy among discounting models. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24, 143160.
  • Killeen, P. R. (2009). An additive-utility model of delay discounting. Psychological Review, 116, 602619.
  • Kirby, K. N. (1997). Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 5470.
  • Kirby, K. N., & Maraković, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 100104.
  • Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 7887.
  • Köbberling, V., & Wakker, P. P. (2005). An index of loss aversion. Journal of Economic Theory, 122, 119131.
  • Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62, 443477.
  • Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 573597.
  • Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
  • Markowitz, H. (1952). The utility of wealth. Journal of Political Economy, 60, 151158.
  • Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, L. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior V: The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 5573). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • McAlvanah, P. (2010). Subadditivity, patience, and utility: The effects of dividing time intervals. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76, 325337.
  • Mellers, B. A., & Biagini, K. (1994). Similarity and choice. Psychological Review, 101, 505518.
  • Newton, M., & Raftery, A. (1994). Approximate Bayesian inference with the weighted likelihood bootstrap. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 56, 348.
  • Noor, J. (2011). Intertemporal choice and the magnitude effect. Games and Economic Behavior, 72, 255270.
  • al-Nowaihi, A., & Dhami, S. (2009). A value function that explains magnitude and sign effects. Economics Letters, 105, 224229.
  • Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534552.
  • Pitt, M. A., Myung, I. J., & Zhang, S. (2002). Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychological Review, 109, 472491.
  • Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1991). Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Science, 37, 770786.
  • Raftery, A. E. (1996). Hypothesis testing and model selection. In W. R. Gilks, D. J. Spiegelhalter, & S. Richardson (Eds.), Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (pp. 163188). London: Chapman and Hall.
  • Read, D. (2001). Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23, 532.
  • Read, D., Frederick, S., & Airoldi, M. (2012). Four days later in Cincinnati: Longitudinal tests of intertemporal preference reversals due to hyperbolic discounting. Acta Psychologica, 140, 177185.
  • Read, D., Frederick, S., & Scholten, M. (2013). DRIFT: An analysis of outcome framing in intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 573588.
  • Read, D., & Roelofsma, P. H. M. P. (2003). Subadditive versus hyperbolic discounting: A comparison of choice and matching. Organizational Behavioral and Human Decision Processes, 91, 140153.
  • Read, D., & Scholten, M. (2012). Tradeoffs between sequences: Weighing accumulated outcomes against outcome-adjusted delays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 16751688.
  • Restle, F. (1961). Psychology of judgment and choice: A theoretical essay. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Roelofsma, P. H. M. P., & Read, D. (2000). Intransitive intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 161177.
  • Rosenthal, J. (2011). Optimal proposal distributions and adaptive MCMC. In S. Brooks, A. Gelman, G. Jones, & X.-L. Meng (Eds.), Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (pp. 93112). London: Chapman and Hall.
  • Sayman, S., & Öncüler, A. (2009). An investigation of time inconsistency. Management Science, 55, 470482.
  • Scheibehenne, B., Rieskamp, J., & González-Vallejo, C. (2009). Cognitive models of choice: Comparing decision field theory to the proportional difference model. Cognitive Science, 33, 911939.
  • Scholten, M., & Read, D. (2006). Discounting by intervals: A generalized model of intertemporal choice. Management Science, 52, 14261438.
  • Scholten, M., & Read, D. (2010). The psychology of intertemporal tradeoffs. Psychological Review, 117, 925944.
  • Scholten, M., & Read, D. (2013). Time and outcome framing in intertemporal tradeoffs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 11921212.
  • Scholten, M., & Read, D. (2014). Prospect theory and the “forgotten” fourfold pattern of risk preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
  • Shafir, E. B., Osherson, D. N., & Smith, E. E. (1993). The advantage model: A comparative theory of evaluation and choice under risk. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 325378.
  • Stott, H. P. (2006). Cumulative prospect theory's functional menagerie. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32, 101130.
  • Takahashi, T. (2005). Loss of self-control in intertemporal choice may be attributable to logarithmic time-perception. Medical Hypotheses, 65, 691693.
  • Takahashi, T., Oono, H., & Radford, M. H. B. (2008). Psychophysics of time perception and intertemporal choice models. Physica A, 387, 20662074.
  • Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8, 201207.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297323.
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010). Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage-Dickey method. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 158189.
  • Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect theory for risk and ambiguity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.