SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adger, W.N., Brown, K. & Tompkins, E.L. (2005). The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecol. Soc. 10, 9.
  • Apostolopoulou, E. & Paloniemi, R. (2012). Frames of scale challenges in Finnish and Greek biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Soc. 17, 9.
  • Armitage D.R., Plummer, R. Berkes, F. et al. (2009). Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6, 95-102.
  • Beierle, T.C. & Konisky, D.M. (2001). What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environ. Plan. C 19, 515-527.
  • Berkes, F (2006). From community-based management to complex systems: the scale issue and marine commons. Ecol. Soc. 11, 45.
  • Borowski, I., Le Bourhis, J P. Pahl-Wostl, C. & Barraque, B (2008). Spatial misfit in participatory river basin management: effects on social learning, a comparative analysis of German and French case studies. Ecol. Soc. 13, 22.
  • Buizer, M., Arts, B. & Kok, K. (2011). Governance, scale and the environment: the importance of recognizing knowledge claims in transdisciplinary areas. Ecol. Soc. 16, 21.
  • Butler, J.R.A., Middlemas, S.J., McKelvey, S.A. et al. (2008). The Moray Firth Seal Management Plan: an adaptive framework for balancing the conservation of seals, salmon, fisheries and wildlife tourism in the UK. Aquat. Conserv. 18, 1025-1038.
  • Carlsson, L. & Berkes F. (2005). Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. J. Environ. Manage. 75, 65-76.
  • Cash, D.W., Adger, W.N., Berkes, F. et al. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol. Soc. 11, 8.
  • Christensen, R.H.B. (2011). Analysis of ordinal data with cumulative link models – estimation with the R-package ‘ordinal’. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ordinal/vignettes/clm_intro.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2012.
  • Cumming, G.S., Cumming, D.H.M. & Redman, C.L. (2006). Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecol. Soc. 11, 14.
  • European Commission. (2000). Managing Natura 2000 sites, the provisions of article 6 of the Habitats Directive 92/43/CEE. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/management/docs/art6/provision_of_art6_en.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2012.
  • Folke, C., Pritchard, L. Jr., Berkes, F., Colding, J. & Svedin, U. (2007). The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecol. Soc. 12, 30.
  • Gray, B. (2003). Framing of environmental disputes. Pages 11-34 in R.J. Lewicki, B. Gray, M. Elliott, editors. Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  • Harrison, C. & Burgess, J. (2000). Valuing nature in context: the contribution of common-good approaches. Biodivers. Conserv. 9, 1115-1130.
  • JNCC. 2009. UK SAC site list: River Bladnoch site details. http://www.jncc.gov.uk/protectedsites/sacselection/sac.asp?EUCode=UK0030249. Accessed 23 August 2010.
  • Kok, K. & Veldkamp, T.A. (2011). Scale and governance: conceptual considerations and practical implications. Ecol. Soc. 16, 23.
  • Lebel, L., Garden, P. & Imamura, M. (2005). The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. Ecol. Soc. 10, 18.
  • Lee, K.N. (1993). Greed, scale mismatch, and learning. Ecol. Appl. 4, 560-564.
  • Lewis-Beck, M.S., Bryman, A. & Liao, T.F. (2004). The Sage encyclopaedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, London.
  • Meadowcroft, J. (2002). Politics and scale: some implications for environmental governance. Landscape Urban Plan. 61, 169-179.
  • Mohan, G. (2001). Beyond participation: strategies for deeper empowerment. Pages 153-167 in B. Cooke, U. Kothari., editors. Participation: the new tyranny? Zed Books, London.
  • Newig, J. & Fritsch, O. (2009). Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level – and effective? Environ. Policy Gov. 19, 197-214.
  • Norusis, M. (2011). IBM SPSS statistics 19 advanced statistical procedures companion. Pearson Education, US.
  • Olsson, P., Folke, C., Galaz, V., Hahn, T., Schultz, L. (2006). Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere reserve, Sweden. Ecol. Soc. 12, 28.
  • Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of socio-ecological systems. Science 325, 419-422.
  • Padt, F.J.G. & Westerink, J. (2012). Addressing scale in open space preservation: learning from the Hague region in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. Published online May 9, 2012.
  • Parkins, J.R. & Mitchell, R.E. (2005). Public participation as public debate: a deliberative turn in natural resource management. Soc. Nat. Resour. 18, 529-540.
  • QSR International. (2010). NVivo 9 QSR International, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Redpath, S.M., Young, J., Evely, A. et al. (2013). Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021.
  • R Development Core Team. (2011). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.31.
  • Rowe, G. & Frewer, L.J. (2000). Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 25, 3-29.
  • Richards, C., Sherlock K. & Carter, C. (2004). Practical approaches to participation. SERP policy brief no.1. Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen.
  • Rockloff, S.F. & Moore S.A. (2006). Assessing representation at different scales of decision making: rethinking local is better. Policy Stud. J. 34, 649-670.
  • Termeer, C.J.A.M., Dewulf, A. & van Lieshout, M. (2010). Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive management. Ecol. Soc. 15, 29.
  • Van Lieshout, M., Dewulf, A., Aarts, N. & Termeer, C. (2011). Do scale frames matter? Scale frame mismatches in the decision making process of a “mega farm” in a small Dutch village. Ecol. Soc. 16, 38.
  • Williams, P.M. (2012). Collaboration in public policy and practice: perspectives on boundary spanners. Policy Press, Bristol.
  • Young, J.C., Butler, J.R.A., Jordan, A. & Watt, A.D. (2012). Less government intervention in biodiversity management: risks and opportunities. Biodivers. Conserv. 21, 10951100.
  • Young, J.C., Jordan, A., Searle, K. et al. (2013). Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? Biol. Conserv. 158, 359-370.
  • Young, J. & Marzano, M. (2012). Embodied interdisciplinarity: what is the role of polymaths in environmental research? Environ. Conserv. 37, 373-375.
  • Young, O. (2006). Vertical interplay among scale-dependent environmental and resource regimes. Ecol. Soc. 11, 27.