• Open Access

Rethinking Corruption in Conservation Crime: Insights from Madagascar

Authors

  • Meredith L. Gore,

    Corresponding author
    1. Michigan State University, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, School of Criminal Justice, East Lansing, MI, USA
    • Correspondence

      Meredith L. Gore, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, 13 Natural Resources Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. Tel: 517-432-8203;

      Fax: (517) 432-1699.

      E-mail: gorem@msu.edu

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jonah Ratsimbazafy,

    1. Groupe d'Etude et de Recherche sur les Primates de Madagascar (GERP). Logement 34, Antananarivo, Madagascar
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Michelle L. Lute

    1. Michigan State University, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, East Lansing, MI, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Editor Krister Par Andersson

Abstract

Corruption affects biodiversity conservation. Mechanisms that more effectively reform corruption and mitigate negative effects of corruption on conservation are needed, especially in biodiversity hotspots such as Madagascar. Local definitions of corrupt behavior, attitudes about reforms, and motivations for noncompliance may generate deeper understanding about corruption, which in turn may advance the conservation community's thinking and invite new solutions. We conducted in-depth interviews with Malagasy residents living adjacent to the Makira/Masoala Conservation Area, querying perceptions about regional corruption, rules in use (i.e., social norms or rules in action), rule breaking, and mechanisms for reform. Most participants framed noncompliance with conservation rules as a deficit/absence (e.g., lack of knowledge of rules), defined local corruption more as an omission of duty than a commission of crime, and discussed poverty, unfairness, and diverse rules in use related to corruption. Traditional framing of corruption singularly as a lack or absence of honesty and morality or as a normative phenomenon does not seem wholly accurate at reflecting, or for thinking about, the local context. Data herein allude such inaccuracy may be most noteworthy at the level of corruption reform. Rethinking corruption in conservation crime as a blend of dimensions may liberalize the suite of reform mechanisms available to conservationists.

Ancillary