Editor Edward Webb
A Comparison of Social Outcomes Associated with Different Fisheries Co-Management Institutions
Version of Record online: 9 AUG 2013
©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Volume 7, Issue 3, pages 224–232, May/June 2014
How to Cite
Cinner, J. and Huchery, C. (2014), A Comparison of Social Outcomes Associated with Different Fisheries Co-Management Institutions. Conservation Letters, 7: 224–232. doi: 10.1111/conl.12057
- Issue online: 2 JUN 2014
- Version of Record online: 9 AUG 2013
- Accepted manuscript online: 24 JUL 2013 12:21PM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 15 JUL 2013
- Manuscript Received: 20 FEB 2013
Disclaimer: Supplementary materials have been peer-reviewed but not copyedited.
Table S1. Operational rules developed and enforced by 42 co-management sites from artisanal coral reef fisheries.
Table S2. Significant variables in the livelihood outcomes model.
Table S3. Candidate models for livelihood outcomes without country as a random effect.
Table S4. Significant variables in the compliance outcomes model.
Figure S1. Compliance outcomes by rule type: A = closed areas, G = gear restrictions, R = restricted access of nonmembers, S = species restrictions, and T = temporal restrictions.
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.