SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Behrens, V., Rauschmayer, F. & Wittmer, H. (2008). Managing international ‘problem’ species: why pan-European cormorant management is so difficult. Environ. Conserv., 35, 5563.
  • Brower, L.P., Castilleja, G., Peralta, A., et al. (2002). Quantitative changes in forest quality in a principal overwintering area of the monarch mutterfly in Mexico, 1971–1999. Conserv. Biol., 16, 346359.
  • Brower, L.P., Taylor, O.R., Williams, E.H., et al. (2012). Decline of monarch butterflies overwintering in Mexico: is the migratory phenomenon at risk? Insect Conserv. Diver., 5, 95100.
  • Burkle, L.A., Marlin, J.C. & Knight, T.M. (2013). Plant-pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence, and function. Science, 339, 16111615.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Cameron, T.A. & Huppert, D.D. (1989). OLS versus ML estimation of non-market resource values with payment card interval data. J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 17, 230246.
  • Carson, R.T. (2012). Contingent valuation: a practical alternative when prices aren't available. J. Econ. Perspect., 26, 2742.
  • Chichilnisky, G. (1998). Economic returns from the biosphere. Nature (London), 391, 629630.
  • Coursey, D. (1994). The revealed demand for a public good: evidence from endangered and threatened species, NYU Environ. Law J., 6, 411449.
  • Garibaldi, L.A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Winfree, R., et al. (2013). Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science, 339, 16081611.
  • Goulson, D. (2013). REVIEW: an overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides. J. Appl. Ecol., 50, 977987.
  • Halstead, J. & Luloff, A. (1992). Protest bidders in contingent valuation. Northeast. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 21, 160169.
  • Hausman, J. (2012). Contingent valuation: from dubious to hopeless. J. Econ. Perspect., 26, 4356.
  • Honey-Rosés, J., López-Garcia, J., Rendón-Salinas, E., et al. (2009). To pay or not to pay? Monitoring performance and enforcing conditionality when paying for forest conservation in Mexico. Environ. Conserv., 36, 120-128.
  • Kinzig, A.P., Perrings, C., Chapin, F.S., et al. (2011). Paying for ecosystem services—promise and peril. Science, 334, 603604.
  • Kling, C.L., Phaneuf, D.J. & Zhao, J. (2012). From Exxon to BP: Has some number become better than no number? J. Econ. Perspect., 26, 326.
  • Lindhjem, H. & Tuan, T. (2012). Valuation of species and nature conservation in Asia and Oceania: a meta-analysis. Environ. Econ. Policy Studies, 14, 122.
  • Loomis, J.B. & White, D.S. (1996). Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ., 18, 197206.
  • McCarthy, M.A., Thompson, C.J., Hauser, C., et al. (2010). Resource allocation for efficient environmental management. Ecol. Lett., 13, 12801289.
  • Metrick, A. & Weitzman, M.L. (1996). Patterns of behavior in endangered species preservation. Land Econ., 72, 116.
  • Miller, K. (2011). Conservation of migratory species in a changing climate: strategic behavior and policy design. Environ. Law, 41, 573598.
  • Missrie, M. (2004). Design and implementation of a new protected area for overwintering monarch butterflies in Mexico. Pages 141150 in K.S. Oberhauser, M.J. Solensky, editors. The monarch butterfly: biology and conservation. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
  • MonarchWatch (2013). Monarch Watch Waystation Program. http://monarchwatch.org/waystations/(visited 3 May, 2013).
  • Morse-Jones S., Bateman I.J., Kontoleon A., et al. (2012). Stated preferences for tropical wildlife conservation amongst distant beneficiaries: charisma, endemism, scope and substitution effects. Ecol. Econ., 78, 918.
  • NGA. (2012). National Gardening Survey: the national gardening association's comprehensive study of consumer gardening practices, trends, and product sales. National Gardening Association, South Burlington, VT, USA.
  • Pate, J. & Loomis, J. (1997). The effect of distance on willingness to pay values: a case study of wetlands and salmon in California. Ecol. Econ., 20, 199207.
  • Pleasants, J.M. & Oberhauser, K.S. (2012). Milkweed loss in agricultural fields because of herbicide use: effect on the monarch butterfly population. Insect Conserv. Diver., 6, 135144.
  • Portney, P. (1994). The contingent valuation debate: why economists should care. J. Econ. Perspect., 8, 317.
  • Ramirez, M., Miranda, G. & Zubieta, R. (2006). Serie Cartografica Monarca Volumen 1. Vegetacion y Cubiertas del Suelo, 2006. Reserva de la Biosfera Mariposa Monarca. Instituto de Geografia, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Richardson, L. & Loomis, J. (2009). The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: an updated meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ., 68, 15351548.
  • Rubin, J., Helfand, G. & Loomis, J. (1991). A benefit-cost analysis of the northern spotted owl. J. Forest., 89, 2530.
  • Salzman, J. (2005). Creating markets for ecosystem services: notes from the field. New York University Law Review, 80, 871961.
  • Skagen, S.K. & Knopf, F.L. (1993). Toward conservation of midcontinental shorebird migrations. Conserv. Biol., 7, 533541.
  • Tisdell, C., Nantha, H.S. & Wilson, C. (2007). Endangerment and likeability of wildlife species: how important are they for payments proposed for conservation? Ecol. Econ., 60, 627633.
  • United States Census Bureau. (2012). Statistical Abstract of the United States (131st Edition), Washington, DC.
  • Walsh, B. (2013). The plight of the honeybee. Pages 1429. TIME, Time Inc.
  • Wines, M. (2013). Monarch migration plunges to lowest level in decades. Page 1. New York Times. New York times, New York, USA.
  • Xerces. (2013). The Xerces Society for inverterbrate conservation, Western Monarch thanksgiving count. http://www.xerces.org/butterfly-conservation/western-monarch-thanksgiving-count/(visited 3 May, 2013).