SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Andren, H., Linnell, J.D.C., Liberg, O. et al. (2006) Survival rates and causes of mortality in Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in multi-use landscapes. Biol. Conserv. 131, 23-32.
  • Bergstrom, B.J., Vignieri, S., Shefield, S.R., Sechrest, W. & Carlson, A.A. (2009) The Northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf is not yet recovered. BioScience 59, 991-999.
  • Beschta, R.L. & Ripple, W.J. (2009) Large predators and trophic cascades in terrestrial ecosystems of the western United States. Biol. Conserv. 142, 2401-2414.
  • Bright, A.D. & Manfredo, M.J. (1996) A conceptual model of attitudes toward natural resource issues: a case study of wolf reintroduction. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 1, 1-21.
  • Bruskotter, J.T. & Enzler, S.A. (2009) Narrowing the definition of endangered species: implications of the U.S. Government's interpretation of the phrase “A Significant Portion of its Range” under the endangered species act of 1973. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 14, 73-88.
  • Bruskotter, J.T., Enzler, S.A. & Treves, A. (2011) Rescuing wolves from politics: wildlife as a public trust resource. Science 333, 1828-1829.
  • Bruskotter, J.T. & Fulton, D.C. (2012) Will hunters steward wolves? A comment on treves and martin. Soc. Nat. Resour. 25, 97-102.
  • Bruskotter, J.T., Schmidt, R.H. & Teel, T.L. (2007) Are attitudes toward wolves changing? A case study in Utah. Biol. Conserv. 139, 211-218.
  • Carroll, C., Phillips, M.K., Lopez-Gonzalez, C.A. & Schumaker, N.H. (2006) Defining recovery goals and strategies for endangered species: the wolf as a case study. BioScience 56, 25-37.
  • Carroll, C., Vucetich, J.A., Nelson, M.P., Rohlf, D.J. & Phillips, M.K. (2010) Geography and recovery under the US Endangered Species Act. Conserv. Biol. 24, 395-403.
  • Enzler, S.A. & Bruskotter, J.T. (2009) Contested definitions of endangered species: the controversy regarding how to interpret the phrase “A Significant Portion a Species’ Range”. Virginia Environ. Law J. 27, 1-65.
  • Estes, J.A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J.S. et al. (2011) Trophic downgrading of planet earth. Science 333, 301-306.
  • Geenwald, N.D. (2009) Effects on species’ conservation of reinterpreting the phrase “significant portion of its range” in the US Endangered Species Act. Conserv. Biol. 23, 1374-1377.
  • Hall, E.R. (1981) The mammals of North America. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  • Kaczensky, P., Chapron, G., von Arx, M., Huber, D., Andrén, H. & Linnell, J.D.C. (2013) Status, management and distri-bution of large carnivores—bear, lynx, wolf & wolverine—in Europe, Part 2. p. 200. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Kamel, A. (2010) Size, biology, and culture: persistence as an indicator of significant portions of range under the Endangered Species Act. Ecol. LQ 37, 525-561.
  • Karlsson, J. & Sjöström, M. (2007) Human attitudes towards wolves, a matter of distance. Biol. Conserv. 137, 610-616.
  • Koblmüller, S., Nord, M., Wayne, R.K. & Leonard, J.A. (2009) Origin and status of the Great Lakes wolf. Mol. Ecol. 18, 2313-2326.
  • Kriebel, D., Tickner, J., Epstein, P. et al. (2001) The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ. Health Perspect. 109, 871-876.
  • Liberg, O., Chapron, G., Wabakken, P., Pedersen, H.C., Hobbs, N.T. & Sand, H. (2012) Shoot, shovel and shut up: cryptic poaching slows restoration of a large carnivore in Europe. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279, 910-915.
  • Linnell, J.D.C., Swenson, J.E. & Andersen, R. (2001) Predators and people: conservation of large carnivores is possible at high human densities if management policy is favourable. Anim. Conserv. 4, 345-349.
  • Meadow, R., Reading, R.P., Phillips, M., Mehringer, M. & Miller, B.J. (2005) The influence of persuasive arguments on public attitudes toward a proposed wolf restoration in the southern Rockies. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 33, 154-163.
  • Mech, L.D. (2012) Is science in danger of sanctifying the wolf? Biol. Conserv. 150, 143-149.
  • Mladenoff, D.J., Sickley, T.A., & Wydeven, A.P. (1999) Predicting gray wolf landscape recolonization: logistic regression models vs. new field data. Ecol. Appl. 9, 37-44.
  • Nowak, R.M. (2002) The original status of wolves in eastern North America. Southeastern Naturalist 1, 95-130.
  • Oakleaf, J.K., Murray, D.L., Oakleaf, J.K. et al. (2006) Habitat selection by recolonizing wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains of the United States. J. Wildl. Manage. 70, 554-563.
  • PEER. (2013a) Politics dominated wolf de-listing meetings: science was afterthought in developing preferred alternatives for wolf recovery. Available from: http://www.peer.org/news/news-releases/2013/06/26/politics-dominated-wolf-de-listing-meetings/. Accessed 11 November 2013.
  • PEER. (2013b) Suit to Uncover Political Deals Behind Gray Wolf De-listing: Closed-Door Meetings Honed Plan to Strip Gray Wolf Endangered Species Status. Available from: http://www.peer.org/news/news-releases/2013/05/22/suit-to-uncover-political-deals-behind-gray-wolf-de-listing/. Accessed 11 November 2013.
  • Randi, E. (2010) Wolves in the Great Lakes region: a phylogeographic puzzle. Mol. Ecol. 19, 4386-4388.
  • Reclassification of the Grey Wolf in the United States and Mexico, with Determination of Critical Habitat in Michigan and Minnesota, 50 C.F.R. § 9607 (1978).
  • Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Maintaining Protections for the Mexican Wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) by Listing It as Endangered, 78 Fed. Reg. 35664 (proposed June 13, 2013) (to be codified at 50 C.F.R. pt. 17).
  • Scott, J.M., Goble, D.D., Haines, A.M., Wiens, J.A. & Neel, M.C. (2010) Conservation-reliant species and the future of conservation. Conserv. Lett. 3, 91-97.
  • Shelton, S.L. & Weckerly, F.W. (2007) Inconsistencies in historical geographic range maps: the gray wolf as example. Calif. Fish Game 93, 224-227.
  • Smith, D.W., Bangs, E.E., Oakleaf, J.K. et al. (2010) Survival of colonizing wolves in the northern rocky mountains of the United States, 1982–2004. J. Wildl. Manage. 74, 620-634.
  • Switalski, T.A., Simmons, T., Duncan, S.L. & Chavez, A.S., Schmidt, R.H. (2002) Wolves in Utah: an analysis of potential impacts and recommendations for management. pp. 1-54. Utah State University, Logan.
  • Tadano, N.M. (2007) Piecemeal delisting: designating distinct population segments for the purpose of delisting gray wolf populations is arbitrary and capricious. Wash. L. Rev. 82, 795.
  • Treves, A. (2009) Hunting for large carnivore conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 1350-1356.
  • Treves, A. & Martin, K.A. (2011) Hunters as stewards of wolves in Wisconsin and the Northern Rocky Mountains, USA. Soc. Nat. Resour. 24, 984-994.
  • Treves, A., Naughton-Treves, L. & Shelley, V. (2013) Longitudinal analysis of attitudes toward wolves. Conserv. Biol. 27, 315-323.
  • vonHoldt, B.M., Pollinger, J.P., Earl, D.A. et al. (2011) A genome-wide perspective on the evolutionary history of enigmatic wolf-like canids. Genome Res. 21, 1294-1305.
  • Vucetich, J.A., Nelson, M.P. & Phillips, M.K. (2006) The normative dimension and legal meaning of endangered and recovery in the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1383-1390.
  • Williams, C., Ericsson, G. & Heberlein, T.A. (2002) A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction (1972–2000). Wildl. Soc. Bull. 30, 575-584.
  • Wydeven, A.P., Mladenoff, D.J., Sickley, T.A., Kohn, B.E., Thiel, R.P. & Hansen, J.L. (2001) Road density as a factor in habitat selection by wolves and other carnivores in the Great Lakes Region. Endang. Species Update 18, 110-114.
  • Wydeven, A.P., Van Deelen, T.R., Heske, E.J., editors. (2009) Recovery of gray wolves in the great lakes region of the united states: an endangered species success story. Springer, New York, NY.
  • Young, S.P. & Goldman, E.A. (1944) The wolves of North America, Part I. American Wilderness Institute, Washington, D.C.