Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: Comparative Perspectives
Article first published online: 4 AUG 2013
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Corporate Governance: An International Review
Special Issue: Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Structures and Corporate Governance
Volume 21, Issue 5, pages 413–419, September 2013
How to Cite
Devinney, T. M., Schwalbach, J. and Williams, C. A. (2013), Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: Comparative Perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21: 413–419. doi: 10.1111/corg.12041
- Issue published online: 4 AUG 2013
- Article first published online: 4 AUG 2013
- 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28: 447–465. &
- 2007. Putting the “S” back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32: 836–863. , , , &
- 2003. Director primacy: The means and ends of corporate governance. Northwestern University Law Review, 97: 547–606.
- 2009. Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK focus fund. Review of Financial Studies 22: 3093–3129. , , , &
- 1931. Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harvard Law Review, 44: 1049–1074. .
- 2008. The new role for assurance services in global commerce. Journal of Corporation Law, 33: 325–360. , , &
- 2012. Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10: 3–28. , , &
- 2010. Rough consensus and running code: A theory of transnational private law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. &
- 2010. The India way: Lessons for the US. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24: 6–24. , , , &
- 2002. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 15: 503–529.
- 2013. Corporate social responsibility, corporate governance and earnings quality: Evidence from Korea. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21: 447–467. , , &
- 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20: 92–117.
- 2006. Leveraging the private sector: Management-based strategies for improving environmental performance. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. &
- 2011. Global banks as global sustainability regulators? The Equator principles. Law & Policy Review, 33: 542–575. &
- 2013. The role of governance in corporate social responsibility: Lessons from Dutch finance. Business and Society, 52: 282–317. &
- 2009. Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23: 44–56.
- 2011. Social responsibility, global strategy, and the multinational enterprise: Global monitory democracy and the meaning of place and space. Global Strategy Journal, 1: 329–344.
- 2012. Activism on corporate social responsibility. Unpublished Working Paper. London, UK, London Business School. , , &
- 1932. For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Review, 45: 1145–1163.
- 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65–91. &
- 2012. The impact of a corporate culture of sustainability on corporate behavior and performance. NBER Working Paper 19750. Cambridge, MA: NBER. , , &
- Financial Services Authority 2009. The Turner review: A regulatory response to the global banking crisis. London: Financial Services Authority.
- 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Boston, MA: Pitman.
- 2008. Corporate governance as social responsibility: A research agenda. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 26: 452–478.
- 2013. The agency costs of agency capitalism: Activist investors and the revaluation of governance rights. Columbia Law Review, 113: 863–927. &
- 1999. Integrative regulation: A principle-based approach to environmental policy. Law & Social Inquiry, 24: 853–896. &
- 2009. Organizational trust and the limits of management-based regulation. Law and Society Review, 43: 865–900. &
- 2001. The end of history for corporate law. Georgetown Law Journal, 89: 439–479. &
- 2005. The persistent debate about convergence in comparative corporate governance. Sydney Law Review, 27: 743–752.
- 2012. What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43: 834–864. &
- 2011. Modernizing pension fund legal standards for the twenty-first century. In C. A. Williams & P. Zumbansen (Eds.), The embedded firm: Corporate governance, labor, and finance capitalism: 459–473. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. &
- 2008. What is the dependent variable in corporate governance research? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: ii.
- King Committee 1994. King committee report on corporate governance for South Africa. Johannesburg: Institute of Directors.
- King Committee 2002. King committee reports on corporate governance for South Africa. Johannesburg: Institute of Directors.
- 2013. Do responsible investment indices improve corporate social responsibility? FTSE4Good's impact on environmental management. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21: 495–512. , , &
- 2007. Does it pay to be good – And does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Unpublished Working Paper. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School. , , &
- 2008. Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33: 404–424. &
- 2005. Regulation and compliance motivations: Examining different approaches. Public Administration Review, 65: 31–51.
- 2006. The administrative law of global private-public regulation: The case of forestry. European Journal of International Law, 17: 47–87.
- 2003. Das Adam Smith Problem: Its origins, the stages of the current debate, and one implication for our understanding of sympathy. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25: 63–90.
- 2013. Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations in South Africa: New empirical insights from a neo-institutional framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21: 468–494. &
- 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24: 403–441. , , &
- 2002. The open corporation: Effective self-regulation and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- 2007. Meta-regulation: Legal accountability for corporate social responsibility? In D. McBarnet , A. Voiculescu , & T. Campbell (Eds.), The new corporate accountability: Corporate social responsibility and the law: 207–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 2008. Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: 160–177. , , &
- 2013. Putting the good back in good corporate governance: The presence and problems of double-layered agency theory. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21: 420–435. &
- 2000. Political preconditions to separating ownership from corporate control. Stanford Law Review, 5: 539–606.
- 2011. The efficacy of regulation as a function of psychological fit: Reexamining the hard law/soft law continuum. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 12: 581–602. &
- 2013. (Re-)interpreting fiduciary duty to justify socially responsible investment for pension funds? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21: 436–446.
- 2010. Corporate social responsibility: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 463–490. , , &
- 1991. Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- 2005. An emerging third way? The erosion of the Anglo-American value construct. Cornell International Law Journal, 38: 493–553. &
- 2007. Triumph or tragedy? The curious path of corporate disclosure reform in the UK. William & Mary Environmental Law Journal, 31: 317–361. &