SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Accounting Standards Board 1981. SSAP 19: Accounting for investment properties. London: Financial Reporting Council.
  • Accounting Standards Board 1999. FRS 15: Tangible fixed assets. London: Financial Reporting Council.
  • Agrawal, A. & Mandelker, G. N. 1990. Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers: The case of antitakeover charter amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25: 143161.
  • Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. 2006. Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14: 147158.
  • Al-Attar, A. & Hussain, S. 2004. Corporate data and future cash flows. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 31: 861905.
  • Ali, A. & Zhang, W. 2012. CEO tenure and earnings management. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2060119 accessed on 31 July 2012.
  • Almazan, A., Hartzell, J. C., & Starks, L. T. 2008. Active institutional shareholders and costs of monitoring: Evidence from executive compensation. Financial Management, 34(4): 534.
  • Attig, N., Guedhami, O., & Mishra, D. 2008. Multiple large shareholders, control contest, and implied cost of equity. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14: 721737.
  • Bange, M. & De Bondt, W. 1998. R&D budgets and corporate earnings targets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 4: 153184.
  • Beasley, M. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of directors composition and financial frauds. The Accounting Review, 71: 443465.
  • Bethel, J., Liebeskind, J., & Opler, T. 1998. Block share purchases and corporate performance. Journal of Finance, 53: 605634.
  • Black, B. S. & Coffee, J. C. 1994. Hail Britannia? Institutional investor behavior under limited regulation. Michigan Law Review, 92: 19972087.
  • Bowen, R. M., Rajgopal, S., & Venkatachalam, M. 2008. Accounting discretion, corporate governance, and firm performance. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25: 351405.
  • Brous, P. A. & Kini, O. 1994. The valuation effects of equity issues and the level of institutional ownership: Evidence from analysts' earnings forecasts. Financial Management, 23: 3346.
  • Brown, L. & Higgins, H. 2001. Managing earnings surprises in the US versus 12 other countries. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20: 373398.
  • Buchanan, J. & Tullock, G. 1962. The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Bugshan, T. 2005. Corporate governance, earnings management and the information content of accounting earnings: Theoretical model and empirical tests. PhD dissertation, Bond University, Australia.
  • Bushee, B. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73: 305333.
  • Bushee, B. 2001. Do Institutional investors prefer near-term earnings over long-run value? Contemporary Accounting Research, 18: 207246.
  • Cadbury, A. 1992. Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London: Gee & Co.
  • Carleton, W. T., Nelson, J. M., & Weisbach, M. S. 1998. The influence of institutions on corporate governance through private negotiations: Evidence from TIAA-CREF. Journal of Finance, 53: 13551362.
  • Ching, K., Firth, M., & Rui, O. 2006. Earnings management, corporate governance, and the market performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 2: 7398.
  • Chung, R., Firth, M., & Kim, J. 2002. Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8: 2948.
  • Coffee, J. 1991. Liquidity versus control: The institutional investor as corporate monitor. Columbia Law Review, 91: 12771368.
  • Combined Code 2003. The Combined Code on Corporate Governance. London: Financial Reporting Council.
  • Combined Code 2008. The Combined Code on Corporate Governance (revised June 2008). London: Financial Reporting Council.
  • Companies Act 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/pdfs/ukpga_20060046_en.pdf accessed on 21 October 2013.
  • Cornett, M., Marcus, A., & Tehranian, H. 2008. Corporate governance and pay-for-performance: The impact of earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 87: 357373.
  • Dam, L. & Scholtens, B. 2012. Does ownership type matter for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20: 233252.
  • Davidson, R., Goodwin-Stewart, J., & Kent, P. 2005. Internal governance structures and earnings management. Accounting and Finance, 45: 241267.
  • Dechow, P. M. & Dichev, I. 2002. The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77: 3559.
  • Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70: 193225.
  • Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13: 136.
  • DeFond, M. & Jiambalvo, J. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17: 145176.
  • Dhaliwal, D. S., Salamon, G., & Smith, E. D. 1982. The effect of owner versus management control on the choice of accounting methods. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 4: 4153.
  • Diamond, D. W. 1989. Reputation acquisition in debt markets. Journal of Political Economics, 97: 828862.
  • Edmans, A. 2009. Blockholder trading, market efficiency and managerial myopia. Journal of Finance, 64: 24812513.
  • Ferreira, M. & Matos, P. 2007. The colors of investors' money: The role of institutional investors around the world? University of South Carolina, Working Paper.
  • Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. 2005. The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39: 295327.
  • García-Meca, E. & Sánchez-Ballesta, J. P. 2009. Corporate governance and earnings management: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 594610.
  • Gillan, S. L. & Starks, L. T. 2003. Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors: A global perspective. Journal of Applied Finance, 13: 422.
  • Greenbury, R. 1995. Directors' remuneration. London: Gee & Co.
  • Gul, F. A., Chen, C. J. P., & Tsui, J. S. L. 2003. Discretionary accounting accruals, managers' incentives, and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20: 441464.
  • Hampel, S. R. 1998. Committee on corporate governance: Final report. London: Gee & Co.
  • Hendry, J., Sanderson, P., Barker, R., & Roberts, J. 2007. Responsible ownership, shareholder value and the new shareholder activism. Competition & Change, 11: 223240.
  • Higgs, D. 2003. Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. Department of Trade and Industry/HMSO, London. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dti.gov.uk/cld/non_exec_review/pdfs/higgsreport.pdf accessed on 21 October 2013.
  • Hsu, G. C.-M. & Koh, P.-S. 2005. Does the presence of institutional investors influence accruals management? Evidence from Australia. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13: 809823.
  • ISC 2002. The responsibilities of institutional shareholders and agents: Statement of principles. London: Institutional Shareholders Committee.
  • Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit and failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48: 831880.
  • Jiambalvo, J., Rajgopal, S., & Venkatachalam, M. 2002. Institutional ownership and the extent to which stock prices reflect future earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19: 117145.
  • Jiraporn, P. & Gleason, K. C. 2007. Delaware incorporation and earnings management: An empirical analysis. Journal of Applied Finance, 17: 4051.
  • Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigation. Journal of Accounting Research, 29: 193228.
  • Kahn, C. & Winton, A. 1998. Ownership structure, speculation, and shareholder intervention. Journal of Finance, 53: 99129.
  • Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33: 375400.
  • Koh, P.-S. 2003. On the association between institutional ownership and aggressive corporate governance earnings management in Australia. British Accounting Review, 35: 105128.
  • Koh, P.-S. 2007. Institutional investor type, earnings management and benchmark beaters. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26: 267299.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 2002. Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57: 11471170.
  • Laeven, L. & Levine, R. 2008. Complex ownership structures and corporate valuations. Review of Financial Studies, 21: 579604.
  • Maug, E. 1998. Large shareholders as monitors: Is there a trade-off between liquidity and control? Journal of Finance, 53: 6598.
  • McLaren, D. 2004. Global stakeholders, corporate accountability and investor engagement. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12: 191201.
  • McNichols, M. 2002. Discussion of “The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors”. The Accounting Review, 77: 6169.
  • Mishra, D. R. 2011. Multiple large shareholders and corporate risk taking: Evidence from East Asia. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19: 507528.
  • Mitra, S. & Cready, W. 2005. Institutional stock ownership, accruals management, and information environment. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 20: 257265.
  • Myner, P. 2001. Institutional investment in the United Kingdom: A review. Report to HM Treasury.
  • Peasnell, K., Pope, P., & Young, S. 2000. Accruals management to meet earnings targets: UK evidence pre- and post-Cadbury. British Accounting Review, 32: 415445.
  • Peasnell, K., Pope, P., & Young, S. 2005. Board monitoring and earnings management: Do non-executive directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32: 13111346.
  • Porter, M. 1992. Capital choices: Changing the way America invests in industry. Boston, MA: Council on Competitiveness/Harvard Business School.
  • Pound, J. 1992. Beyond Takeovers: Politics comes to Corporate Control. Harvard Business Review, 70, 8393.
  • Pozen, R. C. 1994. Institutional investors: The reluctant activists. Harvard Business Review, 72: 140149.
  • Rajgopal, S., Venkatachalam, M., & Jiambalvo, J. 2002. Is institutional ownership associated with earnings management and the extent to which stock prices reflect future earnings? Contemporary Accounting Research, 19: 117136.
  • Roberts, J., Sanderson, P., Hendry, J., & Barker, R. 2006. In the mirror of the market: The disciplinary effects of company/fund manager meetings. Accounting, Organization and Society, 31: 277294.
  • Rushton, K. 2005. The UK framework governing internal control, speech at SOX 404 in Canada: An Open Forum.
  • Schnatterly, K., Shaw, K. W., & Jennings, W. W. 2008. Information advantages of large institutional owners. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 219227.
  • Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94: 461488.
  • Siregar, S. & Utama, S. 2008. Type of earnings management and the effect of ownership structure, firm size, and corporate governance practices: Evidence from Indonesia. The International Journal of Accounting, 43: 127.
  • Smith, M. P. 1996. Shareholder activism by institutional investors: Evidence from CalPERS. Journal of Finance, 51: 227252.
  • Stapledon, G. P. 1996. Institutional shareholders and corporate governance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Tafara, E. 2007. Remarks on UK and US approaches to corporate governance and on the market for corporate control, US Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • UK Stewardship Code 2010. London: Financial Reporting Council.
  • Walker, D. 2009. A review of corporate governance in UK banks and other financial industry entities, final recommendations. London: HM Treasury.
  • Webb, R., Beck, M., & McKinnon, R. 2003. Problems and limitations of institutional investor participation in corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11: 6573.
  • Williams, C. & Conley, J. 2005. An emerging third way? The erosion of the Anglo-American shareholder value construct. Cornell International Law Journal, 38: 493551.
  • Winton, A. 1993. Limitation of liability and the ownership structure of the firm. Journal of Finance, 48: 487512.
  • Wright, M. & Lockett, A. 2003. The structure and management of alliances: Syndication in the venture capital industry. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 20732102.
  • Xie, B., Wallace, N., & Dadalt, P. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9: 295316.
  • Yeo, G. H., Tan, P. M., Ho, K. W., & Chen, S. 2002. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of earnings. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29: 10231046.
    Direct Link:
  • Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45: 196220.
  • Zwiebel, J. 1995. Block investment and partial benefits of corporate control. Review of Economic Studies, 62: 161185.