SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Acemoglu, D. & Johnson, S. 2005. Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy, 113: 949995.
  • Agarwal, S. & Ramaswami, S. N. 1992. Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23: 127.
  • Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. 2008. An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19: 475492.
  • Aguilera, R. V. & Jackson, G. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28: 447465.
  • Amiti, M. & Wakelin, K. 2003. Investment liberalization and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 61: 101126.
  • Barth, M. & Kasznik, R. 1999. Share repurchases and intangible assets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28: 211241.
  • Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. 2003. Law and finance: Why does legal origin matter? Journal of Comparative Economics, 31: 653675.
  • Bevan, A. & Estrin, S. 2004. The determinants of foreign direct investment into European transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32: 775787.
  • Blodgett, L. L. 1991. Partner contributions as predictors of equity share in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22: 6378.
  • Boubakri, N., Cosset, J., & Guedhami, O. 2005. Postprivatization corporate governance: The role of ownership structure and investor protection. Journal of Financial Economics, 76: 369399.
  • Brouthers, K. D. 2002. Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33: 223231.
  • Brouthers, K. D. & Bamossy, G. 1997. The role of key stakeholders in international joint venture negotiations: Cases from Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies, 28: 285308.
  • Carr, D. L., Markusen, J. R., & Maskus, K. E. 2001. Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise. American Economic Review, 91: 693708.
  • Chen, S. & Hennart, J. M. A. 2002. Japanese investors' choice of joint ventures vs. wholly-owned subsidiaries in the US: The role of market barriers and firm capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33: 118.
  • Cooper, L. G. 1993. Market-share models. In J. Eliashberg & G. L. Lilien (Eds.), Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Volume 5: Marketing: 259314. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Daude, C. & Fratzscher, M. 2008. The pecking order of cross-border investment. Journal of International Economics, 74: 94119.
  • Dikova, D. & van Witteloostuijn, A. 2007. Foreign direct investment mode choice: Entry and establishment modes in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 10131033.
  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 2008. The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 84: 299329.
  • Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., & Shleifer, A. 2007. Private credit in 129 countries. Journal of Financial Economics, 84: 299329.
  • Doh, J. P., Rodriguez, P., Uhlenbruck, K., Collins, J., & Eden, L. 2003. Coping with corruption in foreign markets. Academy of Management Executive, 17: 114127.
  • Driffield, N., Love, J. H., & Menghinello, S. 2010. The multinational enterprise as a source of international knowledge flows: Direct evidence from Italy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41: 350359.
  • Driffield, N., Mickiewicz, T., & Temouri, Y. 2013. Institutional reforms, productivity and profitability: From rents to competition? Journal of Comparative Economics, 41: 583600.
  • Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19: 131.
  • Dyck, A. 2001. Privatization and corporate governance: Principles, evidence and future challenges. The World Bank Research Observer, 16: 5989.
  • EBRD 2011. Transition report 2011. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  • Eicher, T. S. & Schreiber, T. 2010. Structural policies and growth: Time series evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Development Economics, 91: 169179.
  • Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., & Mickiewicz, T. 2013. Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing, 28: 564580.
  • Falcetti, E., Lysenko, T., & Sanfey, P. 2006. Reforms and growth in transition: Re-examining the evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34: 421445.
  • Filatotchev, I. & Mickiewicz, T. 2007. Ownership concentration, ‘private benefits of control’ and debt financing. In T. Mickiewicz (Ed.), Corporate governance and finance in Poland and Russia: 159176. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Fiss, P. 2007. Set-theoretic approach to organization configuration. Academy of Management Review, 32: 11801198.
  • Gatignon, H. & Anderson, E. 1988. The multinational corporation's degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4: 305336.
  • Geringer, J. M. 1991. Strategic determinants of partner selection criteria in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22: 4162.
  • Globerman, S. & Shapiro, S. 2003. Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 34: 1939.
  • Grandori, A. & Furnari, S. 2008. A chemistry of organization: Combinatory analysis and design. Organization Studies, 29: 459485.
  • Henisz, W. 2000. The institutional environment for multinational investment. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 16: 334364.
  • Heugens, P. & Otten, J. 2007. Beyond the dichotomous worlds hypothesis: Towards a plurality of corporate governance logics. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 12881300.
  • Hines, J. R. Jr 1995. Forbidden payment: Foreign bribery and American business after 1977. NBER Working Paper 5266.
  • Hoskisson, R., Castleton, M., & Withers, M. 2009. Complementarity in monitoring and bonding: More intense monitoring leads to higher executive compensation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23: 5774.
  • Javorcik, B. S. & Wei, S. J. 2009. Corruption and cross-border investment in emerging markets: Firm-level evidence. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28: 605624.
  • Jepperson, R. L. 1991. Institutions, institutional effects and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis: 143163. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Judge, W., Douglas, T., & Kutan, A. 2008. Institutional antecedents of corporate governance legitimacy. Journal of Management, 34: 765785.
  • Judge, W. & Naoumova, I. 2004. Corporate governance in Russia: What model will it follow? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12: 302313.
  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. 2009. Governance Matters VIII. Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008. Policy Research Working Paper 4978, World Bank.
  • Kaufmann, D. & Wei, S. 1999. Does grease money speed up the wheels of commerce? NBER Working Papers 7093. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Kim, W. & Hwang, W. 1992. Global strategy and multinationals' entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 23: 2953.
  • Kumar, P. & Zattoni, A. 2013. How much do country-level or firm-level variables matter in corporate governance studies? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21: 199200.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 2008. The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46: 285332.
  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1998. Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106: 11131155.
  • Levinsohn, J. & Petrin, A. 2003. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70: 317341.
    Direct Link:
  • Loredo & Suarez, E. 2000. Privatization and deregulation: Corporate governance consequences in a global economy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8: 6574.
  • Lumineau, F. & Malhotra, D. 2011. Shadow of the contract: How contract structure shapes interfirm dispute resolution. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 532555.
  • Makino, S. & Delios, A. 1996. Local knowledge transfer and performance: Implications for alliance formation in Asia. Journal of International Business Studies, 27: 905927.
  • Mani, S., Antia, K. D., & Rindfleisch, A. 2007. Entry mode and equity level: A multilevel examination of foreign direct investment ownership structure. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 857866.
  • Marshall, M. & Jaggers, K. 2007. Polity IV project. Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2006. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
  • Merlevede, B. & Schoors, K. 2009. Privatisation and foreign direct investment in 10 transition countries. Post-Communist Economies, 21: 143156.
  • Meyer, K., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S., & Peng, M. 2009. Institutions, resources and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 6180.
  • Meyer, K. & Peng, M. 2005. Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: Transactions, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 36: 600621.
  • Mickiewicz, T. 2009. Hierarchy of governance institutions and the pecking order of privatisation: Central-Eastern Europe and Central Asia reconsidered. Post-Communist Economies, 21: 399423.
  • Morck, R. (Ed.) 2007. A history of corporate governance around the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mudambi, R. & Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35: 385406.
  • Oviatt, B. M. & McDougall, P. P. 1994. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25: 4564.
  • Pan, Y. 1996. Influences on foreign equity ownership level in joint ventures in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 27: 126.
  • Parker, S. & van Praag, M. 2006. Schooling, capital constraints, and entrepreneurial performance: The endogenous triangle. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 24: 416431.
  • Petersen, M. A. 2009. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of financial studies, 22(1): 435480.
  • Petrin, A., Poi, B. P., & Levinsohn, J. 2004. Production function estimation in Stata using inputs to control for observables. Stata Journal, 4: 113123.
  • Portes, R. & Rey, H. 2005. The determinants of cross-border equity flows. Journal of International Economics, 65: 269296.
  • Portes, R., Rey, H., & Oh, Y. 2001. Information and capital flows: The determinants of transactions in financial assets. European Economic Review, 45: 783796.
  • PRS Group 2013. International country risk guide. Syracuse, NY: Political Risk Services.
  • Qian, J. & Strahan, P. 2007. How laws and institutions shape financial contracts: The case of bank loans. Journal of Finance, 62: 28032834.
  • Randøy, T. & Jenssen, J. 2004. Privatization and deregulation: Corporate governance consequences in a global economy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12: 281289.
  • Ribeiro, S. P., Menghinello, S., & De Backer, K. 2010. The OECD ORBIS database: Responding to the need for firm-level micro-data in the OECD. OECD Working Paper, STD/DOC(2010).
  • Rodriguez, P., Siegel, D., Hillman, A., & Eden, L. 2006. Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: Politics, corruption and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 733746.
  • Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. 2004. Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9: 131165.
  • Roe, M. 2002. Corporate law's limit. Journal of Legal Studies, 31: 233271.
  • Roe, M. 2008. The institutions of corporate governance. In C. Ménard & M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of new institutional economics: 371400. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Saliola, F. & Zanfei, A. 2009. Multinational firms, global value chains and the organization of knowledge transfer. Research Policy, 38: 369381.
  • Schiehll, E. & Bellavance, F. 2009. Boards of directors, CEO ownership, and the use of non-financial performance measures in the CEO bonus plan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 90160.
  • Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52: 737783.
  • Temouri, Y., Driffield, N. L., & Higon, D. A. 2008. Analysis of productivity differences among foreign and local firms: Evidence from Germany. The Review of World Economics, 144: 3254.
  • Thompson, S. 2011. Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time. Journal of Financial Economics, 99: 110.
  • Uhlenbruck, K., Rodriguez, P., Doh, J., & Eden, L. 2006. The impact of corruption on entry strategy: Evidence from telecommunication projects in emerging economies. Organization Science, 17: 402414.
  • Ward, A., Brown, J., & Rodriguez, D. 2009. Governance bundles, firm performance, and the substitutability and complementarity of governance mechanisms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 646660.
  • Williamson, O. 2000. New institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 38: 595613.
  • Wooldridge, J. M. 1995. Selection corrections for panel data models under conditional mean independence assumptions. Journal of Econometrics, 68: 115132.
  • Wu, S., Xu, N., & Yuan, Q. 2009. State control, legal investor protection and ownership concentration: Evidence from China. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 176192.
  • Xu, D. & Shenkar, O. 2002. Note: Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4): 608618.
  • Yamin, M. & Golesorkhi, S. 2010. Cultural distance and the pattern of equity ownership structure in international joint ventures. International Business Review, 19: 457467.
  • Zattoni, A. & Cuomo, F. 2008. Why adopt codes of good governance? A comparison of institutional and efficiency perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: 115.