COMMENTARIES
Science and Practice in Clinical Psychology Doctoral Training
Article first published online: 21 JAN 2013
DOI: 10.1111/cpsp.12017
© 2013 American Psychological Association. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American Psychological Association
Additional Information
How to Cite
[Clin Psychol Sci Prac 19:375–380, 2012]
Publication History
- Issue published online: 21 JAN 2013
- Article first published online: 21 JAN 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 5 NOV 2012
- Manuscript Received: 2 NOV 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- clinical psychology;
- doctoral training;
- profession;
- science
I evaluate the claim by Heatherington et al. (2012) that most clinical psychology graduate students are primarily educated in cognitive-behavioral theory and therapy. I point out some limitations with their data, in part by describing my own experience in a “CBT” training program. I further contend that even if better data are needed, there may be cause for concern, especially with reference to recent training guidelines. I believe that it is important to consider how young clinical psychology is as a profession and a science and that graduate students in clinical psychology need both pluralism and a thorough grounding in history in order to keep our field moving forward.

1468-2850/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=80262841c8d29e6321bada5c655bed815ae54d05)
1468-2850/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=f7d39ef56c768973897ae05cb5ee2c508e3e4347)
