Conflict of interest: This study did not receive any external funding. The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose involving this study.
Does comfort therapy during controlled donation after circulatory death shorten the life of potential donors?
Article first published online: 21 NOV 2013
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Volume 28, Issue 1, pages 47–51, January 2014
How to Cite
Does comfort therapy during controlled donation after circulatory death shorten the life of potential donors?, , , , , , , .
- Issue published online: 11 JAN 2014
- Article first published online: 21 NOV 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 7 OCT 2013
- non-heart beating donors;
- organ donation;
Controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) remains ethically controversial. The authors developed a controlled DCD protocol in which comfort therapy is regularly used. The aim of this study was to determine whether this policy shortens the DCD donors' life.
The authors retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on patients proposed for DCD at the University Hospital of Liege, Belgium, over a 56-month period. The survival duration of these patients, defined as duration between the time of proposal for DCD and the time of circulatory arrest, was compared between patients who actually donated organs and those who did not.
About 128 patients were considered for controlled DCD and 54 (43%) became donors. Among the 74 non-donor patients, 34 (46%) objected to organ donation, 38 patients (51%) were denied by the transplant team for various medical reasons, and two potential DCD donors did not undergo procurement due to logistical and organizational reasons. The survival durations were similar in the DCD donor and non-donor groups. No non-donor patient survived.
Survival of DCD donors is not shortened when compared with non-donor patients. These data support the ethical and respectful approach to potential DCD donors in the authors' center, including regular comfort therapy.