Assessing the Need for a Research Ethics Remediation Program
Article first published online: 11 FEB 2013
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Clinical and Translational Science
Volume 6, Issue 3, pages 209–213, June 2013
How to Cite
DuBois, J. M., Anderson, E. E. and Chibnall, J. (2013), Assessing the Need for a Research Ethics Remediation Program. Clinical and Translational Science, 6: 209–213. doi: 10.1111/cts.12033
- Issue published online: 10 JUN 2013
- Article first published online: 11 FEB 2013
- Washington University CTSA. Grant Number: 3UL1RR024992-05S2
- NIH-National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
- risk management;
- research integrity;
With supplement funding to the Washington University CTSA, the Restoring Professionalism and Integrity in Research (RePAIR) program was developed at Saint Louis University to meet the remediation needs of institutions nationwide regarding investigators who violate research regulations. With the aim of determining the frequency and kinds of wrongdoing at leading research institutions in the United States, as well as institutional responses and levels of interest in a formal remediation program, an online questionnaire was distributed by email to a research integrity officer (RIO) and institutional review board (IRB) chair at all medical schools and comprehensive doctoral institutions in the United States (N = 194). One hundred sixty-one individuals responded (44%) representing 66% of institutions. For those institutions that had both RIOs and IRB chairs responding, 96% had investigated at least one case over the past 2 years; the modal individual response was 3–5 cases, with a range from 0 to more than 16 cases. The most common forms of wrongdoing were violations of procedure, informed consent, research integrity (fabrication, falsification, plagiarism), privacy, and conflict of interest policies. Most RIOs and IRB chairs expressed interest in the RePAIR program, despite concerns about costs and faculty resistance.