SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Abalone range movement;
  • atmosphere–ocean general circulation model;
  • ecological niche model;
  • ensemble-averaged climate change predictions;
  • extinction risk;
  • marine species distribution models

Abstract

Aim

To establish the robustness of two alternative methods for predicting the future ranges and abundances for two wild-harvested abalone species (Haliotis rubra Donovan 1808 and H. laevigata Leach 1814): single atmosphere–ocean general circulation model (GCM) or ensemble-averaged GCM forecasts.

Location

South Australia.

Methods

We assessed the ability of 20 GCMs to simulate observed seasonal sea surface temperature (SST) between 1980–1999, globally, and regionally for the Indian and Pacific Oceans south of the Equator. We used model rankings to characterize a set of representative climate futures, using three different-sized GCM ensembles and two individual GCMs (the Parallel Climate Model and the Community Climate System Model, version 3.0). Ecological niche models were then coupled to physiological information to compare forecast changes in area of occupancy, population size and harvest area based on forecasts using the various GCM selection methods, as well as different greenhouse gas emission scenarios and climate sensitivities.

Results

We show that: (1) the skill with which climate models reproduce recent SST records varies considerably amongst GCMs, with multimodel ensemble averages showing closer agreement to observations than single models; (2) choice of GCM, and the decision on whether or not to use ensemble-averaged climate forecasts, can strongly influence spatiotemporal predictions of range, abundance and fishing potential; and (3) comparable hindcasting skill does not necessarily guarantee that GCM forecasts and ecological and evolutionary responses to these forecast changes, will be similar amongst closely ranked models.

Conclusion

By averaging across an ensemble of seven highly ranked skilful GCMs, inherent uncertainties stemming from GCM differences are incorporated into forecasts of change in species range, abundance and sustainable fishing area. Our results highlight the need to make informed and explicit decisions on GCM choice, model sensitivity and emission scenarios when exploring conservation options for marine species and the sustainability of future harvests using ecological niche models.