These authors contributed equally to this work.
The pitfalls of ignoring behaviour when quantifying habitat selection
Version of Record online: 24 DEC 2013
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Diversity and Distributions
Volume 20, Issue 3, pages 322–333, March 2014
How to Cite
Roever, C. L., Beyer, H. L., Chase, M. J., van Aarde, R. J. (2014), The pitfalls of ignoring behaviour when quantifying habitat selection. Diversity and Distributions, 20: 322–333. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12164
- Issue online: 14 FEB 2014
- Version of Record online: 24 DEC 2013
- International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
- University of Pretoria
- Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED)
- Environmental Decisions Group at the University of Queensland
- Botswana Department of Wildlife & National Parks
- Paul G. Allen Family Foundation
- Zoological Society of San Diego
- Botswana Government Conservation Trust Fund and Wilderness Trust
Appendix S1. The code and scripts used to fit the three movement models using the software JAGS.
Figure S1. Comparison of the model fit for the pooled and behaviourally averaged habitat selection models.
Figure S2. An adaption of Figure 3 with the 95% confidence intervals included.
Table S1. Summary of elephant telemetry data.
Table S2. Results of model selection to classify animal movement into discrete behavioural states.
Table S3. Estimated parameter values and convergence metrics for the state-space models.
Table S4. Full model results for the resource selection probability function (RSPF)
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.