Get access
Advertisement

Does pyrodiversity beget alpha, beta or gamma diversity? A case study using reptiles from semi-arid Australia

Authors

  • Lisa M. Farnsworth,

    1. Department of Zoology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic., Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Authors considered joint lead authors.
  • Dale G. Nimmo,

    Corresponding author
    1. Landscape Ecology Research Group and Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia
    • Correspondence: Dale G. Nimmo, Landscape Ecology Research Group and Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Vic. 3125, Australia.

      E-mail: dale@deakin.edu.au

    Search for more papers by this author
    • Authors considered joint lead authors.
  • Luke T. Kelly,

    1. Landscape Ecology Research Group and Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia
    2. ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Andrew F. Bennett,

    1. Landscape Ecology Research Group and Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Michael F. Clarke

    1. Department of Zoology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic., Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Aim

A common assumption in fire ecology and management is that landscapes with a greater diversity of fire-ages will support a greater diversity of animal species (i.e. ‘pyrodiversity begets biodiversity’). This assumption is based on the idea that landscapes with a more diverse fire history provide a greater array of post-fire habitats, leading to a greater number of species within the landscape. We assessed the hypothesis that pyrodiversity begets biodiversity by enhancing community differentiation (β diversity), resulting in increased landscape-scale richness (γ-diversity). We used reptiles as a case-study.

Location

The Mallee region of south-eastern Australia.

Methods

We used a study design in which ‘whole’ fire mosaics (12.6 km2) were the unit of replication. Study landscapes (= 28) were selected to represent a gradient in the diversity and extent of fire-age classes. We surveyed reptiles by using pitfall traps at 10 sites within each landscape (280 sites in total). Reptile data were used to characterize reptile assemblages at the landscape-scale in three ways: alpha (average within-site diversity), beta (between-site diversity) and gamma diversity (total diversity).

Results

The diversity of fire-age classes had little influence on the alpha, beta or gamma diversity of reptile assemblages. The properties of fire mosaics that most influenced assemblages were the extent of structurally important fire-age classes. The extent of long-unburned vegetation increased beta diversity but reduced alpha diversity of the total reptile assemblage, essentially cancelling each other out at the landscape scale.

Main conclusions

This study highlights the importance of considering multiple measures of diversity when exploring the influence of landscape properties on biodiversity, as ‘null’ results at the landscape scale (gamma diversity) can result from contrasting patterns in alpha and beta diversity. Using fire to create habitat mosaics, at the scale of this study, is unlikely to enhance the status of reptiles in the region.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary