Plant hybridization: the role of human disturbance and biological invasion

Authors

  • Qinfeng Guo

    Corresponding author
    1. USDA FS, Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, Asheville, NC, USA
    • Correspondence: Qinfeng Guo, USDA FS, Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, 200 WT Weaver Blvd., Asheville, NC 28804, USA.

      E-mail: qguo@fs.fed.us

    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Aim

Anderson & Stebbins (1954, Evolution, 8, 378–388) posited that human activities promote species hybridizations by creating opportunities for hybridization and new habitats for hybrids to persist through disturbances (i.e. the ‘disturbance hypothesis’). While the first part of this hypothesis appears to be well supported, the second part has not been corroborated with empirical evidence, probably because of the lack of appropriate data. In this study, I (1) document the richness and distribution of hybrid plants in the United States; (2) examine the relationships between hybrids of different origins and between hybrid plants and native or exotic plants; and (3) examine possible mechanisms for these relationships and test the disturbance hypothesis.

Location

The United States.

Methods

The richness and distribution of plant hybrids was examined at the county level according to origin, that is, formed between native–native species (× N), native–exotic species (× E) and exotic–exotic species (× E), using data from the Biota of North America Program.

Results

The three hybrid types (× N,× E and × E) were positively related to each other and showed stronger positive relationship with exotic richness than with native richness. They also exhibited similar spatial patterns, with richness hotspots concentrated in the north-east United States and Great Lakes region. However, the richness of hybrids of exotic origin (× E and × E) was not related to county area, as often observed for native species; instead, it showed strong positive relationships with human population density. Thus, the overall patterns of hybrid richness and distribution support the ‘disturbance hypothesis’.

Main conclusions

The results are generally consistent with the disturbance hypothesis. The relationship between the number of hybrids of exotic origin and overall exotic richness provided stronger evidence for human-induced than for naturally caused hybridization, although other possible explanations may also exist.

Ancillary